You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 16, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2011088331


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2011088331

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,481,598 Mar 2, 2031 Abbvie FETZIMA levomilnacipran hydrochloride
8,865,937 May 23, 2032 Abbvie FETZIMA levomilnacipran hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2011088331: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: September 11, 2025


Introduction

The patent WO2011088331, filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), encompasses innovative advancements related to pharmaceutical compositions, dosing methods, or specific formulations aimed at therapeutic efficacy. Conducting a detailed analysis of this patent involves understanding its scope, claims, technical background, and its position within the global patent landscape. This insight is crucial for pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals aiming to navigate licensing opportunities, patent validity, or potential infringement issues.


Scope of WO2011088331

Type and Area of Patent

WO2011088331 is classified within the International Patent Classification (IPC) system under specific classes related to medicinal preparations and drug delivery systems. Although the exact IPC classification needs to be verified via patent databases, similar patents often fall under classes such as A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or toiletry purposes) and A61P (Therapeutic activity of chemical compounds or medicinal preparations).

Technical Field and Purpose

The patent pertains to novel pharmaceutical compositions, with a probable focus on improved drug delivery, enhanced bioavailability, or targeted therapeutic effects. It may involve:

  • Specific combinations or formulations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs)
  • Novel dosing regimens or sustained-release formulations
  • Use of excipients to improve stability, absorption, or patient compliance

Geographical Scope

As a WO (PCT application), the patent claims a worldwide priority, facilitating subsequent national phase filings in jurisdictions like the United States, European Union, China, Japan, etc. The scope of patent rights, therefore, extends across multiple markets, contingent on national phase grants.


Claims Analysis

Claims Structure

The scope of a patent critically depends on its claims, which delimit the legal protection. Typically, patents like WO2011088331 contain:

  • Independent claims defining broad inventive concepts
  • Dependent claims narrowing scope with specific embodiments

Typical Content of Claims

While the exact claims require access to the full document, common claims in such a patent may include:

  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising a specific active ingredient or combination thereof, possibly with unique excipients or delivery systems.
  • A method of treatment utilizing the composition, characterized by particular dosing schedules or administration routes.
  • Specific formulations, such as controlled-release systems, nanoparticles, or liposomal carriers.
  • Use claims delineating the use of the composition for treating particular diseases or conditions.

Scope and Breadth

The broadness of claims decides the patent's strength. For instance:

  • Claims encompassing any dosage form with the active ingredient are broader.
  • Claims specifying particular excipients or manufacturing processes tend to be narrower but may be easier to enforce.

Patent Landscape and Litigative Context

Global Patent Trends

The patent landscape surrounding this technology likely overlaps with existing patents related to:

  • Target therapeutic classes (e.g., oncology, CNS disorders)
  • Delivery systems such as liposomes, nanoparticles, or implantable devices
  • Active pharmaceutical ingredients with a history of extensive patenting (e.g., biologics or small molecules)

An analysis of the patent family reveals:

  • Priority filings—whether the applicant secured early rights in key jurisdictions.
  • Continuation applications—indicating potential ongoing development or strategic broadening.
  • Patent families—mapping relationships to earlier applications or equivalents.

Competitive Landscape

Major players in the pharmaceutical domain may hold competing patents, which could affect freedom-to-operate. For instance, if the patent covers a novel formulation of a widely used drug, competitors might seek alternative approaches or challenge the patent's validity.

Legal Challenges and Litigation

The patent’s enforceability may be contested through validity challenges, especially if prior art exists or if the claims are overly broad. Patent offices or courts may assess:

  • Novelty and inventive step
  • Industrial applicability
  • Sufficiency of disclosure

Strategic Implications

For Innovators and R&D

The patent’s scope may influence future research directions, especially if it covers breakthrough delivery systems or formulations. Companies may:

  • Design around the patent by developing alternative formulations.
  • In license negotiations, leveraging the patent’s rights for commercialization.

For Patent Holders

Protection scope determines how aggressively the patent can be enforced. Broad claims facilitate litigation but may invite validity challenges. Conversely, narrower claims require strategic enforcement.


Conclusion

WO2011088331 embodies a targeted innovation within the pharmaceutical patent landscape, with its scope defined by specific formulations or methods of administration. Its claims likely balance breadth and specificity to optimize protection while minimizing invalidity risks. The patent landscape surrounding this technology showcases a competitive environment that demands strategic patent management and vigilant prior art monitoring.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope primarily covers specific pharmaceutical compositions or delivery methods designed to enhance therapeutic outcomes.
  • Its claims potentially span compositions, methods, and uses, with breadth contingent upon claim drafting.
  • The patent landscape around WO2011088331 involves overlapping rights in key therapeutic and delivery domains, requiring careful landscape analysis.
  • Strategic patent positioning, including licensing, infringement considerations, and possible challenge pathways, depend heavily on the claim structure and jurisdictional scope.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents and potential prior art is vital for maintaining freedom-to-operate and maximizing commercial value.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of WO2011088331 in pharmaceutical patenting?

It represents an innovative approach to drug formulations or delivery systems, potentially offering competitive advantages and extending patent protection in therapeutic markets.

2. How broad are the claims typically in WO-style patents?

Claims can range from broad formulations or methods to narrow, specific embodiments. The scope depends on strategic drafting aimed at protecting core innovations while minimizing invalidity risks.

3. Can WO2011088331 be challenged or invalidated?

Yes. Patent validity could be challenged based on prior art, lack of novelty, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure, especially if broad claims are involved.

4. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?

As a PCT application, it facilitates filings across multiple jurisdictions, aligning with global strategic patent filings for pharmaceutical products.

5. What is the impact of such patents on generic drug development?

Strong patents can delay generic entry; however, they also stimulate innovation by protecting R&D investments. Patent challenges or licensing agreements are often part of market strategy.


Sources:
[1] WIPO Patent Database.
[2] PatentScope and Espacenet for patent family and legal status analysis.
[3] World Patent Index (WPI) classifications.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.