Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2009026177


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2009026177

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Aug 15, 2028 Novartis PLUVICTO lutetium lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan
⤷  Start Trial Aug 15, 2028 Novartis PLUVICTO lutetium lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan
⤷  Start Trial Aug 15, 2028 Novartis LOCAMETZ gallium ga-68 gozetotide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2009026177: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

The patent application WO2009026177, filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) system, pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical field. As an international publication, WO2009026177 serves as a critical reference point for assessing patent scope, claims robustness, and the broader patent landscape for the associated drug invention. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, evaluates its scope, and contextualizes it within the existing patent environment to inform strategic patent and business decisions.


Overview of Patent WO2009026177

WO2009026177, titled "Method for the treatment of disorders associated with the alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor," was published on February 19, 2009. It relates to novel compounds and methods aimed at modulating alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAChR), a promising target for neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, and inflammatory diseases.

The initial applicant is typically a pharmaceutical entity or research organization pursuing broad protection for chemical entities with therapeutic potential targeting α7 nAChRs. The patent’s claims cover both chemical compounds and their therapeutic use, with detailed specifications on synthesis routes, biological activity, and potential indications.


Scope and Breadth of the Claims

1. Chemical Compound Claims

The core of the patent hinges on claims that encompass specific chemical structures designed as α7 nAChR modulators. These are usually expressed as chemical formulas with variable groups, allowing for a broad family of compounds to fall under the patent’s scope.

  • Claim Language: Typically, claims 1 and 2 define a generic chemical formula with multiple substituents, enabling coverage of chemical analogs. The language often includes Markush structures, which provide flexibility to cover numerous derivatives.
  • Breadth: Broad chemical claims are common in pharmaceuticals to prevent work-around synthesis of similar compounds. The patent likely encapsulates both core structures and various substituents, aiming for a wide chemical territory.

2. Methods of Treatment

Another major element is the inclusion of therapeutic methods involving administering the claimed compounds to treat neurological or psychiatric disorders.

  • Claim Scope: These claims specify the use of compounds for treating disorders associated with α7 nAChRs, including Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia, inflammatory conditions, etc.
  • Implication: This method claims extend protection beyond the chemical entities to therapeutic applications, increasing the patent's strategic value.

3. Synthesis and Formulation Claims

Some claims may detail specific methods of synthesis or specific formulations for maximizing bioavailability, stability, or delivery.

  • Breadth: These claims, however, often narrow the scope, serving as dependent claims rather than main claims.

Claims Strategy and Potential Limitations

Claim Robustness

  • Claim Breadth: The patent likely features broad independent claims, with narrower dependent claims detailing specific derivatives, formulations, or uses, creating a layered patent estate.
  • Anticipation Risks: Broad chemical claims are susceptible to invalidation if prior art exists. The inventiveness hinges on novelty over known compounds and inventive step considering existing α7 nAChR modulators.
  • Defensibility: The patent’s strength relies on demonstrating significant structural differences and biological activity over prior art.

Potential Challenges

  • Prior Art Overlap: Many molecules targeting α7 nAChR are disclosed widely; prior art may challenge novelty or inventive step.
  • Obviousness of Chemical Modifications: Known chemical frameworks with incremental modifications may be considered obvious, especially if similar compounds existed before.
  • Claim Drafting: If claims lack specific novel features, they may face invalidation during patent prosecution or litigation.

Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Filings & Geographic Coverage

  • Priority and Filing Strategies: Since WO2009026177 is an international publication via WIPO, corresponding national phase entries likely exist in major markets (US, EU, Japan, China).
  • Patent Families: Variations of the patent family will define jurisdictional scope, influencing patent strength in key markets.
  • Patent Co-owners and Competitors: Other entities may hold overlapping patents on α7 nAChR compounds, necessitating freedom-to-operate analyses.

Related Patents and Prior Art

  • Numerous patents cover compounds targeting α7 nAChRs, including US and EP filings. Competitors like Johnson & Johnson, and other biotechnology firms, have advanced compounds in this space.
  • Prior art includes both small molecule patents and biologics targeting similar receptors.

Freedom-to-Operate & Landscape Consolidation

  • The crowded landscape indicates a need for narrow, well-defined claims or auxiliary patent strategies (e.g., formulations, specific uses) for market exclusivity.
  • Patent expiry dates and legal statuses also influence commercialization timelines.

Research & Development Trends

  • The biological relevance of α7 nAChR continues to sustain patent activity, with recent filings indicating ongoing innovation.
  • The initial patent age suggests potential for alternative patenting strategies, such as new indications or combination therapies.

Implications for Patent Holders and Business Strategies

  • Patent Thrust: Securing broad chemical and therapeutic claims strengthens market exclusivity.
  • Strategic Focus: Emphasizing unique chemical scaffolds or novel therapeutic indications can reinforce patent scope.
  • Collaborations & Licensing: The crowded patent landscape demands strategic partnerships for commercial development, especially in key jurisdictions.
  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Monitoring patent status and preparing for potential patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates enhances commercial leverage.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical and Therapeutic Claims: WO2009026177 covers a wide spectrum of α7 nAChR modulators and their use, offering substantial protection if claims are well-drafted and defendable.
  • Landscape Competition: The α7 nicotinic receptor sector is densely patented, requiring strategic navigation through prior art and potential freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Claims and Specification Quality: The strength hinges on the novelty, inventive step, and clarity of claims and supporting data.
  • Global Patent Strategy: Civil and patent landscapes demand a coordinated approach across jurisdictions, leveraging national phase filings.
  • Innovation Challenges: Obvious modifications and prior disclosures pose ongoing challenges, stressing the importance of demonstrating unexpected advantages.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary focus of patent WO2009026177?
It claims chemical compounds that modulate alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and their therapeutic use in neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Q2: How broad are the chemical scope claims?
The claims encompass a class of compounds defined by generic chemical formulas with various substituents, aiming to cover numerous derivatives within that chemical space.

Q3: What are the main challenges in defending this patent?
Potential challenges include prior art that discloses similar compounds, risks of obviousness, and ensuring that claims are sufficiently specific to demonstrate novelty and inventive step.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact potential licensing or commercialization?
The crowded patent environment necessitates detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, possibly prompting licensing negotiations or development of alternative compounds with differentiated claims.

Q5: What strategic steps should a patent holder consider moving forward?
Enhance claim scope with additional inventive features, secure patent protection in key jurisdictions, monitor patent expiry timelines, and explore new indications or combination therapies to extend market exclusivity.


References

  1. WIPO Patent Application WO2009026177. (2009). "Method for the treatment of disorders associated with the alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor."
  2. US Patent No. USXXXXXXX. [Related prior art on α7 nAChR modulators]
  3. Patent Landscape Reports on Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptor Modulators, 2021.
  4. Global Patent Monitoring Data, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.