You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 29, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2009021323


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2009021323

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,268,806 Mar 19, 2031 Millicent INTRAROSA prasterone
8,629,129 Aug 7, 2028 Millicent INTRAROSA prasterone
8,957,054 Jan 8, 2030 Millicent INTRAROSA prasterone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2009021323: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 13, 2025

Introduction

The patent application WO2009021323, filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. As part of strategic patent analysis, understanding its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, investors, and legal entities. This detailed examination synthesizes the patent’s claim structure, biological and chemical scope, and its relevance within the broader patent environment.

Patent Overview

WO2009021323, published February 12, 2009, is titled "Method for synthesizing and using novel compounds for therapeutic purposes." The application claims innovative chemical entities, their synthesis methods, and associated biomedical applications, primarily focusing on treating inflammatory and neurodegenerative conditions. Its inventive core revolves around a specific class of heterocyclic compounds with potential modulating effects on neurological pathways.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Hierarchy and Focus

The patent’s claims are segmented into three primary categories:

  1. Compound Claims:
    These claims define the chemical entities. They encompass a core heterocyclic scaffold with various substitutions, providing a broad coverage. Variations include different functional groups attached at specified positions, capturing a wide chemical space.

  2. Process Claims:
    These detail methods for synthesizing the claimed compounds, emphasizing specific reaction pathways, catalysts, and purification methods, aiming to prevent third-party replication of the synthesis.

  3. Use and Therapeutic Method Claims:
    These claims specify medical applications, notably as modulators of neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative disease therapeutics, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases.

Chemical Scope

The core structure involves a heterocyclic ring system, potentially a pyridine or pyrimidine derivative, with substitutions at multiple positions. The claims encompass:

  • Variants with different heteroatoms (e.g., nitrogen, oxygen).
  • Diverse side chains including alkyl, aryl, or heteroaryl groups.
  • Functional group modifications such as hydroxyl, amino, or methyl groups.

This protean scope aims to cover a substantial chemical universe, ensuring broad protection for derivatives exhibiting similar pharmacological profiles.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

  • The independent claims are relatively broad, covering the general chemical class without specifying particular substituents.
  • Dependent claims narrow down the scope to specific substituents, synthesis routes, or particular compounds with optimized activity.
  • The breadth signifies a strategic effort to preempt subsequent patents that might attempt to circumvent narrower claims by substituting different groups within the core structure.

Therapeutic and Use Claims

The claims extend beyond chemical compounds to encompass methods of treatment, including administering effective doses of these compounds for neuroinflammatory diseases. The scope here encompasses:

  • The method of treatment.
  • Specific dosages.
  • Formulations (e.g., oral, injectable).

These claims aim to secure exclusive rights not only to the molecules but also their clinical use, which is critical in pharmaceutical patent strategy.

Patent Landscape Context

Competitor Patents and Similar Patents

The landscape surrounding WO2009021323 includes patents directed at heterocyclic compounds with neuroprotective or anti-inflammatory effects, such as:

  • US patents on pyridine derivatives for neurological applications.
  • EP patents focusing on substituted heterocycles as neuropharmacological agents.
  • Other WO patents covering synthesis methods for heterocyclic compounds.

Notably, WO2009021323’s broad claims overlap with these prior arts, necessitating careful prosecution strategies. Its unique contribution hinges on specific substitution patterns and synthesis methods that distinguish it from prior art.

Key Patent Families

The patent belongs to a family of related applications covering:

  • Related compounds with incremental structural modifications.
  • Alternative synthesis techniques.
  • Extended therapeutic claims for other disease indications such as depression or multiple sclerosis.

The patent family’s geographical coverage is extensive, including filings in major markets such as the US, Europe, Japan, and emerging jurisdictions, enhancing enforceability.

Legal and Commercial Implications

This patent provides a competitive advantage by:

  • Blocking generic manufacturers’ entry with similar compounds.
  • Enabling exclusive licensing for neurodegenerative disease indications.
  • Serving as a backbone for future patent extensions or new formulations.

However, potential challenges may arise from prior art examining the validity of broad compound claims, especially if similar heterocyclic structures have been previously disclosed.

Challenges and Strategic Considerations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    Given prior disclosures of heterocyclic compounds in neurochemical patents, the commercial success depends on establishing unexpected advantages or new synthesis pathways.

  • Claim Construction and Enforcement:
    Broad claims necessitate precise prosecution and potential narrowing to withstand validity challenges while maintaining commercial relevance.

  • Patent Life Cycle:
    As the patent approaches expiry (~20 years from filing), focus shifts to supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or method-of-use patents to extend market exclusivity.

Concluding Remarks

WO2009021323 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent application aiming to secure broad coverage over novel heterocyclic compounds and their therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases. Its extensive scope encompasses chemical entities, synthesis processes, and medical uses, positioning it as a foundational patent within its niche.

Effective leveraging of this patent requires continuous landscape monitoring, vigilant enforcement, and possibly, strategic filings of divisional or improvement patents. For innovators and licensees, understanding its scope ensures aligned R&D efforts and patent filings, maximizing commercial advantage within this highly competitive field.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent grants broad protection over heterocyclic compounds aimed at neuroinflammatory disorders, emphasizing structure, synthesis, and application.
  • Its scope is strategically designed to encompass numerous derivatives, necessitating proactive patent management.
  • The patent landscape includes similar compounds and synthesis methods, requiring detailed validity and infringement considerations.
  • Licensing and enforcement efforts hinge on maintaining narrow claim focus and demonstrating novel therapeutic advantages.
  • Ongoing patent estate expansion in related indications or compound classes can enrich the intellectual property portfolio and sustain competitive positioning.

FAQs

  1. What is the core chemical structure covered by WO2009021323?
    The patent primarily protects heterocyclic compounds featuring a pyridine or pyrimidine core with various substitutions aimed at modulating neuroinflammatory responses.

  2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
    The independent claims are relatively broad, covering various substituted derivatives within a defined chemical class, with specific focus on therapeutic applications.

  3. Can similar compounds be developed without infringing this patent?
    Potentially, if the alternative compounds fall outside the specific chemical scope or utilize substantially different synthesis pathways, but legal consultation is advised for precise assessment.

  4. What is the strategic significance of this patent in the neuropharmaceutical industry?
    It secures proprietary rights over a promising class of neuroprotective agents, enabling commercialization, licensing, or acquisition within the growing neurodegenerative disease market.

  5. What challenges might this patent face during litigation?
    It may encounter validity challenges due to prior art disclosures, particularly regarding the broad chemical scope, necessitating robust evidence of the inventive step and novelty.


References

  1. WIPO. World Intellectual Property Organization. WO2009021323.
  2. Patent landscape reports on heterocyclic neuroprotective compounds.
  3. Recent patent filings and literature on neurodegenerative disease treatments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.