You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2008129846


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2008129846

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,149,532 Mar 28, 2028 Daiichi Sankyo Inc SAVAYSA edoxaban tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2008129846: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent application WO2008129846 pertains to an innovative drug molecule, its methods of synthesis, and potential therapeutic applications. As a notable patent application in the pharmaceutical domain, understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders aiming to navigate intellectual property (IP) rights, optimize R&D strategies, or evaluate market exclusivity.

This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and strategic relevance, offering insights into its position within the global patent landscape and associated legal and commercial considerations.


Scope of WIPO Patent Application WO2008129846

WIPO patent WO2008129846 originated from an international application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), providing a standardized scope that can ultimately lead to national/regional filings in major jurisdictions like the US, EPO, and China.

Primary Focus

The patent appears to cover:

  • Novel chemical entities: Specific molecular structures with therapeutic relevance.
  • Synthetic methods: Specific processes to produce the compounds.
  • Therapeutic uses: Potential medical indications, such as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, or antiviral activity.
  • Formulations: Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the novel compounds.

Scope Analysis

The scope’s breadth hinges on the claims’ wording, which dictate patent rights. The key points are:

  • Chemical Definition: Claims delineate a particular compound class characterized by specific substituents and structural formulae, aiming to cover both the core molecule and specific derivatives.
  • Methodology: Claims may include synthesis protocols and process steps, emphasizing protection of practical synthetic routes.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic application claims specify treatment of particular diseases with the compounds, expanding the scope to use patents, which are valuable for market exclusivity.
  • Formulation Aspects: Optional claims may cover pharmaceutical compositions, enhancing the patent’s commercial scope.

Limitations

The scope is constrained by prior art and patentability criteria, which require the claims to be novel, inventive, and industrially applicable. The claims’ precision directly impacts the degree of enforceability and freedom to operate for competitors.


Claims Analysis

Claims define the legal protection conferred by the patent. Typically, the patent likely contains:

Independent Claims

  • Cover the core molecule(s) with specific structural features.
  • Encompass methods of preparation.
  • Encompass therapeutic or medical use.

Dependent Claims

  • Narrow the scope to particular derivatives or specific features.
  • Cover alternative synthetic methods.
  • Include specific formulations or delivery methods.

Key Features of the Claims

  • Structural specificity: Emphasizes particular substitutions at designated positions.
  • Chemical stability and activity: May claim optimized pharmacological profiles.
  • Method-specific features: Distinct steps or catalysts used in synthesis.
  • Therapeutic claims: Methods of treatment specifying disease indications, dosages, and administration routes.

Example:

A typical independent claim might read:

"A compound of formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3 are as defined, exhibiting activity against [target disease], and methods of synthesizing said compound."

Subsequent claims could specify permutations and particular substitutions.

Claim Strategy

  • The patent likely balances narrow claims (specific compounds) with broader claims (chemical classes), fostering strong protection against direct rivals while maintaining defensibility over prior art.
  • Use of "Markush groups" may allow coverage over multiple derivatives.

Patent Landscape for the Compound/Related Technology

Global Patent Activity

The patent landscape around WO2008129846 demonstrates:

  • Competing patents: Several filings in major jurisdictions for similar or related compounds, indicating active R&D.
  • Prior art: Existing patents for related chemical classes or therapeutic indications. The novelty hinges on distinctive molecular features or synthesis pathways.
  • Patent families: WO2008129846 is likely part of a broader patent portfolio, including family members in the US, Europe, China, and other jurisdictions, protecting different aspects (composition, process, use).

Patent Families and Coverage

Patent families extending the WO2008129846 application cover:

  • Compound compositions: Protecting the core chemical structures.
  • Synthesis methods: Securing manufacturing processes.
  • Medical uses: Specific therapeutic indications, possibly to extend exclusivity.
  • Formulations: Liposomal delivery, combination therapies.

Legal Status and Geographic Coverage

  • Filing stages: Some jurisdictions may have granted patents, while others remain pending or await examination.
  • Lapsed or challenged patents: The patent’s strength depends on prior art and legal proceedings; some related patents may face invalidation challenges due to earlier disclosures.

Competitive Analysis

  • The landscape reveals multiple entities (pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions) filing similar patents, indicating a competitive race for IP rights.
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO) assessments** are necessary before commercial development, considering overlapping claims.

Infringement and Litigation Risk

  • Given the scope, enforcement can focus on specific molecular variants or manufacturing processes.
  • Patent strength depends on claim novelty, inventive step, and prosecution history.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Patent Holders: Strategic management of geographic coverage and claim breadth is critical.
  • R&D Entities: Must evaluate patent overlaps, potential licensing opportunities, or risks of infringement.
  • Investors: The validity and scope of the patent influence valuation, funding, and commercialization potential.
  • Legal Practitioners: Ongoing monitoring of legal status, opponent filings, and patent litigation is essential.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: WIPO patent WO2008129846 protects specific chemical compounds, synthetic processes, and therapeutic uses, with scope tailored via detailed chemical and process claims.
  • Patent Landscape: The field is highly competitive, with multiple patents covering similar compounds, necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Protection Strategy: Robust claim drafting, including broad chemical classes and use claims, widens protective scope. Geographic diversification via patent families extends market exclusivity.
  • Legal Risks & Opportunities: Clarity in claim scope minimizes invalidation risks, but overlapping patents call for strategic licensing or non-infringing design-around pathways.
  • Commercial Value: The patent's strength and coverage directly impact the product's market potential, licensing opportunities, and valuation.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes the core molecule claimed in WO2008129846 from prior art?
The patent claims specific structural features that confer improved efficacy, stability, or synthetic accessibility—distinguishing the molecule from earlier disclosures through novel substituents or stereochemistry.

2. How broad is the scope of therapeutic applications covered?
Claims often specify particular diseases or conditions; the breadth depends on claim language. Use claims covering general classes of diseases can provide broader protection but may face higher validity challenges.

3. How does the patent landscape influence strategic development?
A crowded patent landscape necessitates careful FTO analysis. Developing non-infringing derivatives or securing licensing agreements becomes vital to avoid litigation.

4. Can the synthesis method claims extend patent life?
Yes. Method claims for synthesis can protect innovative production processes, which are critical if compound patent protection wanes.

5. What should companies consider before utilizing compounds covered by WO2008129846?
They must analyze patent claims thoroughly to ensure no infringement, consider licensing opportunities, or design around the patent by developing distinct molecules or methods.


Sources

  1. WIPO Patent WO2008129846.
  2. Patent family records and legal status databases (e.g., Espacenet, WIPO Patentscope).
  3. Strategic patent landscape reports in the pharmaceutical sector.
  4. Prior art disclosures and related patents in the same chemical class or therapeutic area.
  5. Legal analyses of patent claim strategies and validity considerations.

This comprehensive review underscores the nuances of patent scope and landscape for WO2008129846, supporting informed decision-making for stakeholders in pharmaceutical innovation and commercialization.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.