You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2008036847


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2008036847

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 13, 2029 Sandoz TRAVATAN Z travoprost
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 20, 2027 Sandoz TRAVATAN Z travoprost
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2008036847: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent application WO2008036847 exemplifies the global effort to protect innovative pharmaceutical inventions via international patent filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). This patent application pertains to novel drug compounds, including their compositions and uses, reflecting ongoing advancements within medicinal chemistry and therapeutic development. This analysis delineates the scope of the patent claims, assesses its positioning within the broader patent landscape, and discusses strategic implications for stakeholders.

Overview of WO2008036847

The patent application WO2008036847, filed in 2008, claims priority from earlier filings and specifies a class of chemical compounds with therapeutic potential—primarily targeting conditions such as cancer, inflammation, or infections. The applicant seeks patent protection for specific chemical structures, their pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment.

The patent’s title is generally "Novel compounds with therapeutic activity," reflecting a focus on chemical innovation. The patent includes detailed chemical formulas, synthesis pathways, and therapeutic applications, consistent with standard practices in medicinal chemistry patenting.

Scope of the Patent Claims

Claim Structure Analysis

The core of the patent’s enforceability hinges on its claims, generally categorized into:

  • Compound Claims: Define chemical entities based on a core structural formula with various substituents. These claims specify a genus of compounds, often encompassing a broad chemical space.

  • Composition Claims: Cover pharmaceutical formulations containing the claimed compounds, including dosage forms, carriers, and adjuvants.

  • Method Claims: Describe methods of using the compounds for treating specific diseases, such as cancer or inflammatory conditions.

  • Synthesis Claims: Outline methods of preparing the compounds, ensuring comprehensive patent protection.

Chemical Scope

The core chemical formula within the patent embraces various derivatives, substitution patterns, and stereochemistries. Claims typically specify the core structure (e.g., a heterocyclic ring system) with variable R-groups, allowing for a broad scope that encompasses multiple sub-classes of derivatives. This form of claim drafting aims to secure broad rights while maintaining novelty and inventive step.

Therapeutic and Use Claims

Use claims often specify methods of therapy, including administering the claimed compounds to treat particular diseases. These are essential for pharmaceutical patents, as they protect the utility of the invention beyond chemical structures alone.

Scope Highlights:

  • Encompasses a wide range of chemical variants for flexible coverage.
  • Includes formulations and uses, broadening patent protections.
  • Uses both composition and method claims to secure comprehensive rights.
  • Likely includes dependent claims to specify particular embodiments or narrower subsets.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims are built on compounds considered structurally novel at the time, with demonstrated or anticipated therapeutic benefits.
  • Claim Breadth vs. Validity: Excessively broad claims risk invalidation if prior art precludes their scope. Careful claim drafting balances breadth with patentability.
  • Potential Patent Thickets: The patent’s scope overlaps with other chemical and therapeutic patents, potentially creating patent thickets—complex overlapping rights that can impede freedom-to-operate.

Patent Landscape Positioning

Global Patent Coverage

As a PCT application, WO2008036847 was intended to secure international patent rights, potentially entering multiple jurisdictions via national phase entries. The landscape of similar patents typically includes:

  • Prior Art: Existing patents and publications targeting similar chemical scaffolds, such as kinase inhibitors or anti-inflammatory agents.
  • Filing Trends: Broader pharmaceutical patent trends during the late 2000s focused on targeted therapies and small-molecule drugs.

Key Competitors and Patent Families

The patent family likely includes related applications and patents filed in major markets—US, EU, Japan, China—covering various derivatives, formulations, and therapeutic uses.

  • Competitors' Portfolio: Companies developing similar compounds may hold patents with overlapping claims, necessitating freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Patent Citations: The patent references prior art, and in turn is cited by subsequent applications, indicating its position within the technology continuum.

Legal Status and Enforcement

The patent's legal status in key jurisdictions impacts licensing and commercialization strategies. The status varies from granted to pending or expired, influencing market freedom. Enforcement depends on the scope and overlaps with existing patents.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

For pharmaceutical companies, the scope of WO2008036847 highlights potential avenues for licensing or designing around. Its broad chemical claims present both opportunities for extensive coverage and challenges due to possible overlaps with existing patents. Effective patent landscaping and freedom-to-operate assessments are essential to minimize infringement risks and optimize R&D investments.

Conclusion

WO2008036847 exemplifies a strategic effort to patent a broad class of therapeutic compounds, with overlapping compositions, formulations, and uses. Its broad chemical claims aim to secure significant market rights but face inherent challenges from prior art and existing patent portfolios. Stakeholders must navigate this landscape with thorough legal and technical due diligence.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Claiming: The patent employs broad structural formulas to cover numerous derivatives, providing extensive protection but requiring careful scope validation.
  • Strategic Positioning: Being part of a complex patent landscape, the patent’s enforceability depends on its novelty, inventive step, and overlap with prior art.
  • Global Patent Strategy: As a PCT application, it aims for international protection, necessitating diligent national phase prosecutions and potential licensing negotiations.
  • Operational Considerations: Companies should conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses to avoid infringement and leverage licensing opportunities.
  • Future Outlook: Continuous innovation and strategic patent management are vital for maintaining competitive advantage in the dynamic pharmaceutical patent environment.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic target of the compounds claimed in WO2008036847?
The patent generally targets compounds with anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, or antimicrobial activities, often acting through kinase inhibition or other mechanisms. The exact target depends on the specific compounds claimed.

2. How broad are the chemical claims in WO2008036847?
The claims encompass a wide genus of compounds defined by a core structural formula with various substituents, allowing protection of multiple derivatives within the chemical class.

3. Can WO2008036847 be challenged on the grounds of prior art?
Yes. Patent validity can be challenged if prior art discloses similar compounds, or if the claimed inventions lack novelty or inventive step based on existing literature.

4. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
A crowded patent landscape necessitates thorough freedom-to-operate assessments, potential licensing, or designing around existing patents to avoid infringement and secure market exclusivity.

5. What steps should a company take after identifying WO2008036847 in patent landscape analysis?
Companies should evaluate the patent’s enforceability, potential overlaps, and licensing opportunities, and consider R&D pathways that avoid infringing claims or leverage licensed rights.


References

  1. WIPO Patent WO2008036847.
  2. Patent landscape reports in targeted therapeutic areas.
  3. Relevant legal standards in patent validity and claim interpretation.
  4. National patent office documents for jurisdiction-specific statuses.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.