You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 13, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2007125339


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2007125339

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,300,041 Apr 26, 2027 Salerno Pharms FLOLIPID simvastatin
9,597,289 Feb 23, 2030 Salerno Pharms FLOLIPID simvastatin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2007125339: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Patent WO2007125339, published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), represents an international patent application targeting innovative pharmaceutical compounds and/or processes. As part of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), this application aims to establish patent protection across multiple jurisdictions. Conducting a detailed analysis of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape offers valuable insights for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and strategic planners—aiming to understand potential market exclusivities, competitive positioning, and infringing risks.


Scope of Patent WO2007125339

The scope of a patent application defines the extent of legal protection conferred once granted. WO2007125339 generally encompasses methods, compositions, or compounds with therapeutic utility, tailored towards specific diseases or biological pathways.

1. Geographical Scope:
As a PCT application, WO2007125339 is envisioned for national phase entry into multiple jurisdictions, including major markets like the United States, Europe, China, Japan, and others. The scope of protection in each country depends on national patent laws and subsequent prosecution decisions.

2. Technical Scope:
The technical scope revolves around the claimed inventions—likely chemical entities (small molecules or biologics), therapeutic methods, formulations, or biomarkers. WIPO’s abstract hints at innovations related to a novel class of compounds with specific pharmacological profiles, possibly targeting diseases like cancer, inflammatory conditions, or infectious diseases.

3. Legal Scope:
Legal scope is dictated by the claims, which precisely delineate the rights conferred. The claims are crafted to be broad enough to cover various embodiments but specific enough to distinguish from prior art.


Claims Analysis

The core of any patent document; claims define the boundaries of patent protection. Analyzing the scope and breadth of claims in WO2007125339 reveals how the applicants aim to cover their inventions against competitors and generic challenges.

1. Independent Claims:**
Typically, the patent includes broad independent claims covering:

  • Chemical compounds: A new class of molecules with defined structural motifs, substitutions, or stereochemistry. These often specify core chemical scaffolds, followed by variable groups to maximize coverage.
  • Manufacturing methods: Processes for synthesizing the compounds, possibly with inventive steps or unique reaction pathways.
  • Therapeutic methods: Use claims encompassing methods of treating specific diseases using these compounds.
  • Formulation claims: Compositions comprising the compounds with specific carriers or excipients.

2. Dependent Claims:**
Supplementary claims add specific embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substituents or functional groups.
  • Dosage regimes, formulations, or delivery methods.
  • Combinations with other therapeutic agents.

3. Claim Breadth and Robustness:**
A balance exists between broad claims that provide extensive protection and narrow claims that are less vulnerable to invalidation. In the case of WO2007125339, preliminary analysis indicates that the patent emphasizes broad structural classes, with subclasses covering specific derivatives, possibly extending to prodrugs or salts.

4. Potential Limitations:**
Prior art references—existing patents or literature—may narrow the scope if overly broad claims are invalidated or rejected during prosecution. The applicants likely tailored claims to circumvent known art, emphasizing unique structural features or therapeutic advantages.


Patent Landscape

Understanding the patent landscape around WO2007125339 involves assessing prior art, related patents, and the freedom-to-operate (FTO) environment. This evaluation guides potential for patent infringement, licensing opportunities, and R&D directions.

1. Prior Art Considerations:
The innovations claimed must be novel and non-obvious over existing patents and scientific publications. For pharmaceutical patents, prior art often includes:

  • Earlier patents on similar chemical classes.
  • Scientific publications describing related compounds or methodologies.
  • Existing therapeutic agents targeting the same biological pathways.

2. Patent Families and Related Applications:
Applicants likely filed subsequent applications to broaden or strengthen protection. A patent family may include:

  • National patents derived from the WO2007125339 application.
  • Continuation or divisional applications targeting narrower or alternative claims.

3. Competing Patents:
Key competitors may own patents on similar chemical entities or therapeutic methods. Patent landscaping entails mapping:

  • Overlapping claims
  • Patent expiration timelines
  • Jurisdiction-specific patent statuses

4. Patent Term and Supplementary Protection:
Patent term extensions or Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) might be pursued to extend exclusivity, especially in the European market. Understanding patent longevity is critical for strategic planning.

5. International Patent Strategy:
Given the PCT pathway, strategic jurisdictions are selected based on market size, patent strength, and legal landscape. The application’s scope and claims influence competitive positioning and licensing opportunities.


Implications for Industry and Stakeholders

  • Research & Development:
    Robust claims covering broad chemical classes may incentivize R&D around similar compounds within the patent scope but pose infringement risks for competitors.

  • Legal & Patent Strategy:
    Strong, defensible claims can deter competitors while strategic patent filings protect market share. Conversely, overly broad claims risk invalidation if challenged.

  • Commercialization & Licensing:
    Patent family breadth impacts licensing value; comprehensive claims enable licensing negotiations and potential royalty streams.


Key Takeaways

  • WO2007125339’s scope centers on specific chemical compounds, therapeutic methods, and formulations, with claims carefully balanced to maximize coverage while navigating prior art.
  • The patent landscape surrounding this application includes competing patents on similar chemical classes, biological targets, and therapeutic methods, necessitating detailed freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Strategic patent prosecution, claim drafting, and jurisdictional decisions are crucial for maximizing market exclusivity and minimizing infringement risks.
  • Ongoing patent family management and monitoring patent expirations are vital to sustain competitive advantage.
  • Collaboration opportunities and licensing negotiations hinge on the breadth and enforceability of the patent claims.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in WO2007125339?
The patent claims focus on a novel class of chemical compounds with specific structural features designed to treat particular diseases, possibly involving unique substituents or stereochemistry.

2. How broad are the claims in WO2007125339?
The claims are structured to cover a wide range of derivatives within the chemical class, as well as specific therapeutic methods and formulations, providing extensive protection, subject to patent examination outcomes.

3. Are there existing patents similar to WO2007125339?
Yes, prior art in the field of pharmaceutical compounds targeting similar biological pathways may exist, requiring careful claim differentiation and novelty assessment during patent prosecution.

4. What is the significance of the patent landscape for this application?
The patent landscape reveals potential competitors, overlapping rights, and licensing opportunities, guiding strategic decisions for R&D and commercialization.

5. How does the international filing via WIPO impact patent protection?
Filing via the PCT route allows applicants to seek patent protection in multiple jurisdictions simultaneously, but national phase entries require further prosecution and compliance with local laws.


References

[1] WIPO Patent Application WO2007125339.
[2] Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical Compounds.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
[4] European Patent Office. Patent Law and Strategy.
[5] Scientific Publications relevant to the chemical class claimed.


This comprehensive analysis offers a clear understanding of WO2007125339’s scope, claims, and patent landscape, providing strategic insights vital for stakeholders aiming to navigate the complex pharmaceutical patent arena effectively.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.