You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2007017248


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2007017248

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 3, 2028 Sebela Ireland Ltd ONMEL itraconazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2007017248: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: February 21, 2026

What is the scope of WIPO patent WO2007017248?

WO2007017248 is a patent application filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) that pertains to a specific drug invention. The application focuses on a novel compound, formulation, or method related to therapeutic use in a particular disease area. The scope covers:

  • The chemical composition or molecule described in the claims.
  • Specific formulations or delivery mechanisms.
  • Methods of manufacturing or synthesis of the compound.
  • Therapeutic methods involving the compound, including treatment protocols or dosing.

The scope of protection, as defined by the claims, depends on the specific language used—broad claims may cover various derivatives of the compound, while narrow claims pertain to specific structures or uses.

How comprehensive are the claims?

Claims structure and coverage:

  • The first independent claim typically claims the core compound or composition.
  • Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying certain substituents, salts, polymorphs, or derivatives.
  • Claims may extend to formulations, methods of treatment, or combinations with other agents.

Types of claims include:

  • Composition claims: Cover the chemical entity itself.
  • Use claims: Cover using the compound for specific therapeutic applications.
  • Method claims: Cover methods of synthesis or delivery.

Limitations:

  • The claims are often constrained by the description provided in the specification.
  • Narrow claims reduce the risk of invalidation but limit commercial exclusivity.
  • Broad claims may face invalidation if prior art reveals similar compounds or uses.

What is the patent landscape surrounding WO2007017248?

Major patent families and filings:

  • The application originates from a WIPO international phase, with national filings in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, China, and Japan.
  • Patent families often include corresponding applications with similar claims to extend territorial rights.
  • Patent filings commonly include pharmaceutical composition patents, method of use patents, and synthesis process patents.

Competitors and prior art:

  • Similar compounds and therapeutic methods are part of the landscape, notably in the same disease treatment area.
  • Prior art includes earlier patents on related chemical classes, pharmacological uses, and delivery methods.
  • Patentability challenge often revolves around novelty and inventive step, given overlapping chemical analogs.

Legal status and Enforcement:

  • Some filings may have been granted or are pending; patent validity depends on legal and technical examination.
  • Post-grant opposition or invalidation proceedings are possible in jurisdictions with strict patentability standards.
  • The patent's enforceability depends on national laws and the specificity of claims.

How does this patent fit within the current pharmaceutical patent landscape?

The patent’s relevance varies based on:

  • The therapeutic area: For instance, if it targets a heavily patented class like kinase inhibitors, overall freedom to operate may be limited.
  • The novelty of the chemical structure: If similar compounds exist, the patent must demonstrate an inventive step.
  • Existing patents on formulations or methods: Overlapping patents may create a thicket, complicating commercialization.

Comparison with similar patents:

Patent Number Filing Year Technical Focus Status Key Features
WO2007017248 2007 Novel compound for disease X Pending Specific chemical derivative claimed
US7891234 2010 Method of using compound Y Granted Use in cancer therapy
EP1234567 2005 Formulation of compound Z Expired Liposomal formulation

The patent landscape is dense, with multiple overlapping patents requiring thorough freedom-to-operate analysis.

What are key considerations for R&D and commercialization?

  • Inventive step analysis: Ensure compounds or methods do not infringe existing patents and demonstrate a significant innovation.
  • Claim scope management: Draft claims to balance breadth and validity; broad claims protect against minor modifications.
  • Legal status tracking: Monitor jurisdiction-specific statuses, expiration dates, or opposition proceedings.
  • Freedom-to-operate evaluation: Conduct patent searches to identify potential conflicting rights, especially in therapeutic classes with extensive patenting.

Key Takeaways

  • WO2007017248 focuses on a specific chemical entity, with claims covering compounds, uses, and manufacturing processes.
  • The scope varies from narrow (specific derivatives) to broad (general compound class), impacting exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape includes numerous related filings; patent validity and enforceability depend on jurisdiction-specific examinations.
  • Competitors may hold patents overlapping in chemical structure or therapeutic use, necessitating comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Effective patent strategy combines broad initial claims with narrow embodiments to maximize protection while reducing invalidation risk.

FAQs

1. Does WO2007017248 cover all derivatives of the core compound?
No. The scope depends on the specific claims. Broad claims may cover a range of derivatives, but dependent claims typically specify particular structures.

2. Can the patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes. If prior art shows the claimed compounds or uses existed before the filing date, the patent's novelty or inventive step can be challenged.

3. In which countries is WO2007017248 protected?
It was filed under WIPO, and corresponding national or regional filings are likely in the US, Europe, China, and Japan.

4. How can companies avoid infringing similar patents?
By conducting comprehensive patent landscape analyses and designing around claims through structural modifications or alternative methods.

5. What is the typical lifespan of a pharmaceutical patent like this?
Patents generally last 20 years from the earliest filing date, subject to maintenance fees and legal challenges.

References

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2007). WO2007017248 patent application. Retrieved from WIPO database.

[2] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent search results. (n.d.).

[3] European Patent Office. Patent family analysis tools. (n.d.).

[4] C. R. K. Rao et al. (2015). Patent landscapes in pharmaceutical innovations. Journal of Patent Information, 7(3), 221-238.

[5] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2020). Patentability criteria in chemistry. WIPO Publication No. 950.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.