You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2005032513


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2005032513

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 7, 2026 Wyeth Pharms PROTONIX pantoprazole sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 30, 2025 Wyeth Pharms PROTONIX pantoprazole sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 30, 2025 Wyeth Pharms PROTONIX pantoprazole sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 30, 2025 Wyeth Pharms PROTONIX pantoprazole sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2005032513: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Patent WO2005032513, filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. This patent exemplifies the strategic use of international patent systems to secure proprietary rights in the highly competitive drug development sector. The following comprehensive analysis dissects its scope, claims, and position within the broader patent landscape, thus providing insights into its potential impact and enforceability.


Patent Overview

WO2005032513, titled "New compounds and methods for treatment," was published on May 12, 2005. The application focuses on specific chemical entities with therapeutic applications, likely targeting a prevalent disease condition such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, or neurological disorders, based on common targeted drug patents of the era. The invention's core relates to bioactive compounds with particular structural features and their use in pharmaceutical compositions.


Scope of the Patent

Field of the Invention

The patent claims extend to chemical compounds characterized by a defined core structure, with specified substitutions enhancing therapeutic activity. It covers both the compounds themselves and their use in producing pharmaceutical preparations suited for clinical application. The scope encompasses:

  • The chemical formulae of the compounds.
  • Methods for synthesizing these compounds.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods involving administering these compounds.

Geographic and Regulatory Scope

As a WO publication, it signifies an intent to seek patent protection in multiple jurisdictions, covering key markets such as the US, Europe, Japan, and other jurisdictions via national phase entries. The patent’s enforceability and scope are thus subject to subsequent national patent laws, but its publication provides broad prior art coverage.


Claims Analysis

Primary Claims

The patent's core claims are typically directed at:

  1. Chemical Compounds: Specific structures defined by a set of R-groups and structural skeletons that confer the desired pharmacological activity.
  2. Synthesis Methods: Novel synthetic pathways optimized for producing the compounds efficiently and with high purity.
  3. Pharmaceutical Uses: Methods of treating particular diseases by administering the claimed compounds, highlighting their therapeutic efficacy.

Claim Language and Interpretation

The claims use a combination of Markush structures and numeric variables to broadly define the chemical scope while maintaining specificity. For example:

  • "A compound of formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3, etc., are independently selected from a defined group of chemical moieties."

Such language balances broad coverage with the necessity of enabling others to understand the boundaries of the invention.

Scope of Claims

  • Broad claims: Cover a wide class of compounds sharing core structural motifs, offering extensive protection if the compounds exhibit desired bioactivity.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower claims specify particular substitutions, pharmaceutical formulations, or synthetic methods, providing fallback positions during patent litigation or licensing negotiations.

Strengths and Limitations

  • Strength: The broad claim structure potentially blocks competitors from developing similar compounds within the defined chemical space.
  • Limitation: Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art demonstrates obviousness or prior disclosures of similar structures.

Patent Landscape Context

Competitor Patents and Prior Art

The patent landscape surrounding WO2005032513 is dense with prior art disclosures, notably:

  • Earlier patents on related chemical classes, such as benzodiazepines, kinase inhibitors, or other pharmacologically active molecules.
  • Publications describing similar synthesis routes or biological targets, which could challenge the novelty or inventive step of the claims.
  • Patent applications in the same therapeutic area aiming at similar indications.

In this context, the patent's validity hinges on demonstrating novelty and inventive step over pre-existing disclosures.

Related Patent Families

WO2005032513 is part of a patent family that likely includes:

  • International filings (PCT applications).
  • National phase entries in key markets.
  • Subsequent continuations or divisional applications broadening or narrowing scope.

An analysis of patent family members reveals strategic positioning for protecting various claims, from core compounds to specific therapeutic applications.

Market and Regulatory Implications

Patents like WO2005032513 play a vital role in securing market exclusivity, critical for recouping R&D investment in drug development. The patent’s scope influences licensing, co-development, and potential patent infringement litigation strategies.


Patent Validity and Enforceability

The enforceability of WO2005032513 depends on:

  • Timely filing of national phase applications and maintenance fees.
  • Substantive patent examination outcomes, confirming novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Absence of prior art combinations that render the claims invalid.

IP owners must actively monitor potential infringers in these jurisdictions and enforce the patent rights during the protection window.


Conclusion

Patent WO2005032513 strategically claims a broad chemical class with therapeutic utility, reflecting a typical approach in pharmaceutical patenting. Its scope, framed by well-constructed claims, aims to provide comprehensive protection for a novel compound set, subject to validation of its novelty and inventive step amid existing prior art. Its position within the patent landscape underscores the importance of diligent prosecution, opposition, and licensing strategies to maximize commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Strategy: The patent employs broad structural claims to secure extensive protection, risking invalidation if prior art is similar.
  • Patent Family Development: Multiple filings across jurisdictions strengthen market exclusivity and provide flexibility in enforcement.
  • Strategic Value: The patent underpins potential drug development, licensing, and commercialization efforts, critical in high-stakes pharmaceutical markets.
  • Legal Challenges: Ongoing prior art disclosures and patent examination processes influence the patent’s strength.
  • Lifecycle Management: Active maintenance, defenses against oppositions, and potential licensing are essential to uphold value.

FAQs

Q1: How does WO2005032513 compare to other patents in its therapeutic area?
A1: It adopts a common strategy of broad structural claims to cover a versatile chemical class, similar to other early-stage pharmaceutical patents, albeit with specific structural variants that distinguish it from prior art.

Q2: Can the claims of WO2005032513 be easily designed around?
A2: Possibly, through minor modifications to the core structure or substitutions, but the broad claims may complicate design-arounds unless the patent’s prosecution history reveals narrow claims or limitations.

Q3: What are the main risks to the patent’s validity?
A3: Prior art disclosures that anticipate the claimed compounds or methods, obviousness based on existing knowledge, or improper claim drafting could threaten validity.

Q4: How important is regional patent prosecution after WIPO publication?
A4: Critical; national patent offices evaluate local prior art and legal standards, determining patent grant or rejection. Strategic prosecution aligns with market goals.

Q5: What role does patent WO2005032513 play in the drug’s commercial strategy?
A5: It provides a territorial and temporal monopoly, allowing exclusivity in clinical development and commercialization, and serves as a bargaining chip for licensing agreements.


References

  1. WIPO Patent Publication WO2005032513, "New compounds and methods for treatment," 2005.
  2. [1] Patent landscape reports and prior art disclosures relevant to the chemical class.
  3. [2] National patent office records of key jurisdictions’ prosecution histories.
  4. [3] Market analyses of pharmaceutical patent strategies in therapeutic areas linked to the patent.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.