You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: I643858


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: I643858

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,189,837 Oct 20, 2031 Pfizer TALZENNA talazoparib tosylate
8,735,392 Oct 20, 2031 Pfizer TALZENNA talazoparib tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Taiwan Drug Patent TWI643858

Last updated: August 15, 2025

Introduction

Taiwan Patent TWI643858 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention centered on a novel compound, formulations, or therapeutic method. Conducting a comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is critical for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and biotech investors—seeking to navigate Taiwan's intellectual property (IP) environment effectively. This review dissects the patent's legal scope, compares its claims with relevant prior art, and situates it within the regional patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Background

Taiwan's patent system aligns closely with global standards, offering robust protection for pharmaceutical innovations. The TWI643858 patent was filed to safeguard a specific invention with therapeutic or chemical novelty, likely addressing unmet medical needs or improving existing drug formulations. The patent application's filing date is critical for establishing priority and assessing novelty; though the exact date is not provided here, TWI643858 appears to be a recent filing, reflecting current innovations.


Scope of the Patent: Technical Field and Invention Summary

TWI643858 claims relate to the creation of a new drug compound or a specific pharmaceutical formulation. The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition: Patent claims may involve a novel chemical entity, its derivatives, or salts. The scope extends to molecules with specific structural features and substitutions, designed for enhanced efficacy or stability.

  • Method of Use: The patent might define therapeutic methods, dosing regimens, or targeted diseases, broadening protection to various application scenarios.

  • Pharmaceutical Formulations: Claims could include specific formulations—e.g., sustained-release, targeted delivery systems—that improve drug bioavailability or patient compliance.

  • Manufacturing Process: Broader patents often encompass synthesis methods, purification steps, or process innovations that facilitate scalable production.


Claims Analysis

The core of the patent lies in its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of protection. These claims can be categorized into independent and dependent types, with the former establishing the broadest rights and the latter providing specific embodiments.

Independent Claims

Typically, independent claims in pharmaceutical patents cover:

  • A novel chemical compound with defined structural features, such as particular substituents or stereochemistry.
  • A therapeutic method involving administering the compound to treat or prevent a specific disease.
  • An orally or parenterally administered formulation comprising the compound, possibly with excipients that improve stability or solubility.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, refining the independent claims by adding features such as:

  • Specific salt forms, polymorphs, or crystal structures.
  • Particular dosages or administration schedules.
  • Combining the compound with other active ingredients to enhance efficacy.

Claim Scope and Novelty

Based solely on the typical structure of such patents, the scope of TWI643858 likely emphasizes:

  • The unique chemical structure of a compound with unexpected therapeutic properties.
  • Method claims indicating a novel treatment regimen.

The claims must meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, as per Taiwan’s Patent Act [1].


Prior Art and Patent Landscape Context

In assessing the scope, evaluating prior art is crucial. The patent landscape around this invention generally involves:

  • Existing synthetic compounds with similar core structures used for treating the same ailments.
  • Previous patents covering compounds with related modifications or similar pharmaceutical uses.
  • Publications—scientific journals or patent databases—disclosing similar compounds or formulations.

Similar patents and documents likely include:

  • Patents from leading pharmaceutical companies covering compounds with analogous mechanisms of action.
  • Earlier Taiwanese or international patents (e.g., from WO, EP, US parks) with overlapping chemical scaffolds.
  • Public disclosures exploring pharmacological profiles of related compounds.

The patent landscape indicates India and the US market have extensive patenting efforts, yet Taiwan’s patenting emphasizes local innovation rights and manufacturing advantages.

Patent Thickets and Freedom-to-Operate

The dense patent landscape surrounding chemical and pharmaceutical inventions often results in "patent thickets," making freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses complex. The scope of TWI643858 may be circumscribed by these existing patents, which could influence licensing strategies and commercialization plans.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

Validity and Enforceability

The validity of TWI643858 hinges on the novelty and inventive step over prior art. Given the high level of patenting activity, particularly in chemical and pharmaceutical spaces, thorough invalidity searches are essential to confirm enforceability.

Potential Challenges

  • Prior art references showing similar structures or therapeutic methods could be grounds for patentability challenges.
  • Obviousness or lack of inventive step may be invoked by competitors aiming to invalidate the patent.

Opportunities for Licensing and Collaboration

The patent's scope could defend a proprietary niche, facilitating licensing negotiations or joint development. Conversely, broad claims might prompt competitive challenges, leading to legal disputes.


Patent Landscape in Taiwan and Regional Considerations

Taiwan is a vibrant pharmaceutical patent jurisdiction with effective patent term protections of 20 years from the filing date. The region’s patent prosecution trends reflect high activity in biotech and chemical fields, emphasizing inventive step and clear claim boundaries.

Regional Patent Strategies

  • Filing strategies often include priority filings in other jurisdictions, such as the US or Europe, to bolster the patent's strength.
  • Cross-licensing agreements are common, especially when overlapping patent rights exist in neighboring markets.

Comparison with International Patents

Given global patent filings, TWI643858 complements or overlaps with international counterparts. Its impact depends on the breadth of filings and claims in major markets.


Concluding Remarks

TWI643858's scope is primarily centered on a novel pharmaceutical compound/method, with claims likely designed to encompass key structural features and therapeutic uses. Its uniqueness and enforceability depend heavily on how well it distinguishes itself from prior art. The patent landscape underscores the importance of strategic patent drafting, regional filing, and vigilant monitoring of competitors’ patents.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent scope should be evaluated in light of prior art to ensure broad yet defensible claims; narrow claims risk invalidation, while overly broad claims may face patentability challenges.
  • Strategic patent management involves considering regional and international filings to establish strong IP rights, especially in competitive biotech markets.
  • Regular landscape assessments facilitate early identification of potential infringers or conflicting patents, enabling proactive licensing or litigation strategies.
  • Legal validity depends on demonstrating novelty and inventive step; comprehensive prior art searches are crucial.
  • Industry trends indicate increasing patent filings for chemical and biologic drugs in Taiwan, emphasizing the importance of high-quality, defensible patent claims.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like TWI643858?
Pharmaceutical patents generally claim chemical compounds, methods of use, formulations, or manufacturing processes, aiming to protect the core innovation from competitors.

2. How does prior art affect the validity of TWI643858?
Prior art can challenge the patent’s novelty or inventiveness. If similar compounds or methods exist, the patent’s claims may be narrowed or invalidated.

3. Can similar patents limit the enforcement of TWI643858?
Yes. Overlapping rights can lead to patent thickets, requiring strategic licensing or design-around efforts to avoid infringement.

4. Why is regional patent protection important for pharmaceuticals in Taiwan?
Regional protection secures rights within Taiwan’s robust IP framework, preventing local infringement and providing leverage in licensing negotiations.

5. How can patent holders ensure their claims are robust?
By conducting thorough prior art searches, drafting clear and specific claims, and pursuing strategic filings in multiple jurisdictions.


References

[1] Taiwan Patent Act. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.