You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: I619516


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: I619516

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,639,309 Sep 14, 2034 Pfizer XELJANZ XR tofacitinib citrate
11,253,523 Sep 14, 2034 Pfizer XELJANZ XR tofacitinib citrate
9,937,181 Sep 14, 2034 Pfizer XELJANZ XR tofacitinib citrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Taiwan Patent TWI619516

Last updated: August 19, 2025


Introduction

The patent TWI619516, granted in Taiwan, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention with potential strategic importance within the global drug development and patent landscape. The following analysis examines its scope, claims, and positioning within the broader patent environment, providing vital insights for stakeholders seeking to understand its strengths, limitations, and competitive landscape.


Scope and Purpose of TWI619516

Patent TWI619516 claims to protect an innovative drug compound or formulation designed for specific therapeutic purposes. While the detailed specifications are not fully disclosed in the official patent summary, the typical scope revolves around:

  • Chemical composition: The patent likely discloses a novel chemical entity, analog, or derivative with therapeutic activity.
  • Method of use: It potentially claims specific methods of administering the compound, dosage regimes, or treatment indications.
  • Formulation aspects: The patent may cover particular formulations, delivery systems, or stability enhancements that improve efficacy or patient compliance.
  • Manufacturing processes: Certain claims might encompass the synthesis or purification processes for the compound or composition.

The scope appears tailored to carve out a protective intellectual property space around a unique therapeutic agent, possibly in areas such as oncology, neurology, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders — common focus areas in Taiwan’s pharmaceutical R&D landscape.


Claims Analysis

The core of any patent’s strength lies in its claims, which define the legal boundaries of protection. TWI619516’s claims can be categorized into:

  1. Compound Claims:
    These specify the molecular structure, substituents, or stereochemistry of the novel compound. For example, claims may specify a chemical formula with particular variations, aiming to cover not only a specific molecule but also close analogs that share core features.

  2. Use Claims:
    These extend protection to novel therapeutic methods. Use claims typically specify a method of treatment for particular diseases or patient populations, making the patent relevant for pharmaceutical applications.

  3. Formulation and Delivery Claims:
    Claims may cover unique pharmaceutical compositions, such as specific carriers, sustained-release formulations, or combination therapies.

  4. Process Claims:
    Covering methods of synthesis, purification, or formulation of the compound, these claims aim to prevent competitors from replicating manufacturing routes.

Strengths of the Claims:

  • Broad Composition Claims: If the patent claims a broad chemical class or structural variation, it enhances exclusivity.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: These increase enforceability in marketing claims and regulatory approvals.
  • Combination Claims: When covering synergistic formulations or delivery systems, they bolster protection for multi-component therapies.

Potential Limitations:

  • Narrow Claims: If claims focus narrowly on a specific compound or process, competitors might circumvent by designing around them.
  • Prior Art Overlap: The scope may be compromised if prior art discloses similar compounds or uses, limiting enforceability.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Global and Regional Patent Filings:

  • In addition to the Taiwanese patent TWI619516, the applicant might have filed in key jurisdictions such as China, the US, EU, Japan, and other major markets.
  • Patent families covering chemical compounds often include continuous applications across jurisdictions to extend geographical coverage and market exclusivity.

Existing Patents and Prior Art:

  • The novelty and inventive step of TWI619516 depend on the novelty over prior art, which may include earlier patents, scientific literature, or prior disclosures.
  • Given the proliferation of chemical patents, the applicant likely performed extensive freedom-to-operate analyses to carve out a defendable niche.

Patent Strengths and Challenges:

  • Strengths: If the claims are broad and the compound demonstrates clear therapeutic benefits, the patent can serve as a valuable asset for licensing, partnership, or exclusive commercialization.
  • Challenges: Patents in chemical and pharmaceutical domains face high invalidation risks from prior art, especially concerning incremental modifications or obvious derivatives.

Market Implications:

  • The patent's enforceability provides the patent holder with leverage in negotiations with generic or biosimilar developers.
  • The patent’s timing (filing date, priority claims) influences its competitive standing, particularly in rapidly evolving therapeutic areas.

Strategic Significance of TWI619516

This patent positions its holder strategically by:

  • Securing exclusivity over a promising chemical entity or formulation, critical for pharmaceutical commercialization.
  • Providing a platform for subsequent formularies, combination therapies, or indication expansions.
  • Enhancing patent portfolio strength, essential for attracting licensing interest, partnership negotiations, or attracting investment.

In the Taiwanese context, strong local protection aids navigating the regional regulatory environment while serving as a stepping stone for global strategy.


Conclusion

Patent TWI619516 demonstrates a focused effort to protect a novel pharmaceutical invention within Taiwan's dynamic IP landscape. Its strength largely hinges on the breadth of its claims, the robustness of its inventive step, and its positioning amid prior art.

For stakeholders, understanding its scope enables informed decisions on potential licensing, patent enforcement, or R&D continuation. As patent life progresses, continuous monitoring of legal events and potential opposition proceedings will be critical.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad claims enhance enforceability, but narrow claims risk territorial or circumstantial challenges.
  • Strategic patent filing across jurisdictions maximizes global protection and market potential.
  • Thorough prior art searches are essential to defend patent scope and validity.
  • Integration with clinical development amplifies patent value, especially for method-of-use claims.
  • Monitoring patent expiry and potential challenges ensures proactive IP management and market positioning.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like TWI619516?
They generally encompass chemical compounds, methods of use, formulations, and manufacturing processes, aiming to secure comprehensive protection of the invention.

2. How does Taiwan's patent law influence the scope of pharmaceutical patents?
Taiwan’s patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Patents must be sufficiently disclosed and non-obvious over prior art, impacting claim scope and enforcement.

3. Can TWI619516 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods, or if the patent fails to meet validity criteria, challengers can seek invalidation through legal proceedings.

4. How important are patent claims in pharmaceutical commercialization?
Claims define the legal scope of exclusivity, directly impacting market competitiveness, licensing opportunities, and revenue streams.

5. What strategic considerations should companies keep in mind regarding this patent?
Companies should evaluate patent strength, monitor legal status, explore licensing opportunities, and conduct freedom-to-operate analyses to maximize commercial advantage.


Sources:

  1. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). Official patent specifications and legal status.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent databases and global filings.
  3. Industry publications on pharmaceutical patent strategy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.