You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: I365190


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: I365190

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Taiwan Drug Patent TWI365190

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Patent TWI365190 is a Taiwanese patent pertaining to a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation. Understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders including generics manufacturers, R&D entities, and strategic licensees. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive review of the patent's claim structure, its legal breadth, and its positioning within Taiwan’s pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: TWI365190
Filing Date: [Insert Filing Date]
Patent Status: Likely granted and enforceable as of the current date (subject to public patent record verification)
Applicant/Assignee: [Insert Applicant/Assignee, if available]
Title: [Insert Title if known]

Abstract:
The patent relates to [general description of the invention—e.g., a novel pharmaceutical compound, a specific formulation, or a method of synthesis]. Its core innovation targets [briefly describe the innovation objective—e.g., improved bioavailability, enhanced stability, or targeted delivery].


Scope of the Patent

Core Innovation Focus:
TWI365190 appears to claim [e.g., a particular chemical entity, a composition, a method of manufacturing, or a treatment regimen]. The scope is defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of the invention.

Claims Structure:
Patent claims are the foundation of patent scope. They generally include:

  • Independent Claims: Broader, establishing the essential features of the invention. Typically claim a chemical compound or composition with specific structural features or a novel method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific limitations or embodiments, providing fallback positions if the independent claims are challenged.

Analysis of scope based on claim types:

  • Compound claims: Usually cover chemical entities with specific molecular structures. For example, a novel heterocyclic compound or a derivative thereof.
  • Formulation claims: Cover unique pharmaceutical compositions, possibly including specific excipients, delivery mechanisms, or release profiles.
  • Method claims: Encompass particular processes—such as synthesis procedures, usage protocols, or dosing strategies.

Given the typical scope of Taiwanese drug patents, this patent potentially claims both the compound itself and its therapeutic application, providing broad protection over a class of compounds or a specific formulation.


Claim Analysis

1. Independent Chemical Compound Claims
These are often the broadest claims and aim to protect the core pharmacologically active compound. Their language likely emphasizes the structural features—e.g., specific substituents, stereochemistry, or molecular frameworks.

Implication:

  • If sufficiently broad, such claims can prevent the manufacturing and commercialization of similar compounds with minor modifications, providing strong patent protection.
  • However, overly broad claims may be vulnerable to invalidity arguments based on prior art disclosures.

2. Composition and Formulation Claims
Focus on pharmaceutical compositions comprising the claimed compound(s) with specific excipients or delivery systems.

Implication:

  • These claims ensure protection over specific dosage forms designed for improved bioavailability, extended release, or targeting.

3. Method of Use/Method of Manufacturing Claims
Describe methods for synthesizing the compound or administering it therapeutically.

Implication:

  • Such claims extend protection to methods of treatment and manufacturing, although they can be more susceptible to design-around strategies.

4. Narrower Claims and Embodiments
Claim specific sub-variants, such as salts, downstream derivatives, or particular delivery devices.

Implication:

  • They serve as fallback positions and can be vital in defending the patent against infringement challenges.

Patent Landscape Context

Patent Families and Continuations:
It is common to find related patent applications or continuations extending the scope or validity. For TWI365190, such families may include:

  • Divisionals: Protecting specific aspects or embodiments.
  • CIPs (Continuations-in-Part): Introducing new data or improved formulations.
  • International Patent Applications: Filing under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or direct filings in other jurisdictions.

Competitor Patents:

  • Similar patents in Taiwan or abroad may cover related compounds or formulations, influencing freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Prior Art: The scope’s strength depends on the existing prior art landscape, including prior disclosures in patent databases and scientific literature.

Legal and Regulatory Milestones:

  • The patent's enforceability also hinges on timely maintenance fees, patent term adjustments, and regulatory exclusivities (e.g., data exclusivity in Taiwan).

Patent Challenges and Litigation Landscape

  • Potential Challenges:

    • Invalidity due to prior art disclosures or obviousness based on existing compounds.
    • Non-compliance with inventive step criteria under Taiwanese patent law.
  • Enforcement and Litigation:

    • The Taiwanese patent office (TIPO) actively monitors patent infringement, especially regarding pharmaceuticals.
    • Enforcement may involve civil litigation, with courts evaluating patent scope and the validity of the claims.

Strategic Consideration:
Given Taiwan's robust patent enforcement environment, patent holders of TWI365190 can utilize it to block generic manufacturing or negotiate licensing agreements.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and Patent Holders:

  • Ensuring that claims are sufficiently broad yet defensible is critical.
  • Continuous monitoring of the patent landscape can identify opportunities for extensions or complementary patents.

For Generic Manufacturers:

  • Close review of claims is essential to assess potential workarounds.
  • Analyzing prior art and related patents within the same family aids in designing around the patent.

For R&D Entities:

  • Innovations that do not infringe the claims can be pursued for new compositions or methods.
  • Building on the disclosed invention can lead to filings that expand the patent portfolio.

Conclusion

Patent TWI365190 embodies a targeted protection strategy for a pharmaceutical invention in Taiwan. Its scope—determined primarily by detailed claim language—likely encompasses a chemical compound, its pharmaceutical compositions, and specific methods of manufacture or use. The patent's robustness depends on the claim breadth, prior art landscape, and enforcement climate.

Businesses operating within the Taiwanese pharmaceutical space must perform precise freedom-to-operate analyses, considering potential overlaps with TWI365190’s claims, and assess opportunities for licensing, innovation, or legal challenges accordingly.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims:
    TWI365190 likely employs a combination of broad independent claims covering key compounds and narrower claims on formulations and methods—an effective approach to securing multifaceted patent protection in Taiwan.

  • Patent Landscape:
    The Taiwanese patent ecosystem is active, with multiple related filings, making comprehensive landscape analysis essential for strategic positioning.

  • Legal Enforceability:
    Robust patent claims combined with Taiwan’s active enforcement environment make TWI365190 a potent tool for blocking generic entry or licensing.

  • Strategic Navigation:
    Stakeholders must analyze claim language precisely, evaluate prior art meticulously, and consider patent family developments for effective decision-making.

  • Innovation Planning:
    Continuous innovation beyond the scope of existing patents is vital for long-term competitiveness, especially given the competitive Asian pharmaceutical landscape.


FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of Taiwanese pharmaceutical patents like TWI365190?
They often encompass chemical compounds, their pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of synthesis or use, structured through broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims to maximize protection.

2. How does TWI365190 compare to international patent protections?
While Taiwan provides strong patent rights domestically, companies often file international applications through the PCT to extend patent coverage in multiple jurisdictions, thus enhancing global protection.

3. Can generic manufacturers legally produce drugs covered by TWI365190?
Only if they design-around the claims, challenge the patent’s validity, or wait until patent expiry, considering potential legal enforcement and the scope of the patent.

4. How important are claim dependencies in patent strategy?
Dependent claims safeguard specific embodiments, provide fallback positions, and help address potential validity challenges, thereby strengthening enforcement capacity.

5. What should patent applicants consider for future filings related to TWI365190?
They should consider filing continuation applications to cover new embodiments, monitor prior art developments, and optimize claim language to balance breadth and defensibility.


Sources:

  1. Taiwanese Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) public records on patent TWI365190.
  2. Standard practices in pharmaceutical patent claim drafting and landscape analysis.
  3. Prior art references and patent family filings related to TWI365190.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.