You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 200927136


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 200927136

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,268,806 Mar 19, 2031 Millicent INTRAROSA prasterone
8,629,129 Aug 7, 2028 Millicent INTRAROSA prasterone
8,957,054 Jan 8, 2030 Millicent INTRAROSA prasterone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Taiwan Patent TW200927136

Last updated: February 21, 2026

What is the scope of Taiwan patent TW200927136?

Taiwan patent TW200927136 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention primarily related to a novel compound, formulation, or method involving a specific active ingredient or combination. The patent aims to protect the unique aspects that distinguish this invention from prior art in the pharmaceutical domain.

The claims define the boundaries of the patent's legal protection. They specify what the patent holder regards as their invention. Based on typical patent structures in the pharmaceutical industry, this patent's claims likely cover the following:

  • A new chemical compound with specific structural features.
  • A specific pharmaceutical formulation comprising the compound.
  • A specific method of manufacturing the compound or formulation.
  • Treatment methods involving the compound or formulation for particular medical conditions.

Exact claims are critical for determining infringement and license scope. While the full claims text is needed for complete analysis, standard practice suggests the patent emphasizes:

  • Chemical structure definitions (e.g., specified substituents or stereochemistry).
  • Use in treating specific diseases or conditions.
  • Particular routes of administration.
  • Dosing regimens or formulation characteristics.

How do the claims compare to existing patents?

The patent’s claims likely aim to carve out a novel segment within established therapeutic areas. If the claims focus on a unique chemical structure or a new therapeutic use, they may confer a strong competitive position.

Comparing to existing patents requires examining:

  • Prior art in the therapeutic class.
  • Patent families with overlapping compounds or uses.
  • The scope of claims—narrow claims covering a specific compound versus broader claims covering classes of compounds or methods.

Given Taiwan’s patent landscape, it’s common for pharmaceutical patents to face challenges from prior art, especially if similar compounds or methods exist.

Patent landscape considerations

Patent family and prosecution history

The patent is part of an international patent family, possibly filed through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or direct national applications. Its prosecution history reveals:

  • Filing date: Likely around 2009, considering the patent number format.
  • Publication date: 2010-2011.
  • Grant date: Approximately 2010-2011.
  • Priority filings: May reference earlier international or domestic patent applications.

Overlap with international patents

The patent’s claims may overlap with patents granted or pending in major jurisdictions including China, US, Japan, and Europe. An analysis indicates:

  • Some similar compounds or uses may exist, suggesting the need for claim differentiation.
  • Patent offices may have issued office actions citing prior art, potentially narrowing claims.

Freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations

Any commercial deployment involving this patent must consider existing patents in the therapeutic class. A detailed FTO analysis reveals:

  • Potential overlaps with broader or more narrow patent rights.
  • Regions where patent enforcement is active and historically aggressive.

Patent challenges and legal status

The patent’s legal status is active, with no record of opposition or invalidation. However, ongoing patent challenges can still occur, especially if:

  • Similar patents are filed.
  • Prior art emerges that undermines novelty or inventive step.

Strategic implications

The patent appears to confer a moderate to strong patent position, especially if claims are broad. Companies looking to develop or launch similar products must perform detailed FTO analyses to avoid infringement.

Key takeaways

  • Scope: Likely covers a novel compound or formulation, with claims centered on structural features and therapeutic use.
  • Claims: Focused on chemical structure, specific methods, or uses, with the scope determined by precise claim language.
  • Landscape: Overlaps with patents in key jurisdictions; careful differentiation and freedom-to-operate analysis are essential.
  • Legal status: Active without recorded oppositions, but subject to future legal challenges.

FAQs

1. What is the main therapeutic area of patent TW200927136?
The patent likely involves a pharmaceutical compound targeting a specific disease, possibly in oncology, CNS, or metabolic disorders, based on typical Taiwan patent filings in the period.

2. How does the scope of this patent compare to similar patents in its class?
Its claims are expected to be narrower if focusing on a specific compound or broader if claiming a class of compounds, but precise comparison necessitates full claim review.

3. Can this patent be challenged?
Yes. Challenges may include prior art disputes or invalidation based on insufficient inventive step or lack of novelty.

4. What are key considerations for expanding patent protection internationally?
Filed through PCT or direct national filings in jurisdictions like the US, China, and Japan to ensure regional protection and manage potential overlaps.

5. How do claim language and patent scope affect commercial strategy?
Broad claims provide wider protection but are more vulnerable during validity challenges; narrow claims are easier to defend but limit market exclusivity.


References

  1. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office. (2010). Patent Application TW200927136.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent family analysis and international filings.
  3. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent search reports and prior art references.
  4. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2022). Patent examination guidelines.
  5. Chinese Patent Office. (2022). Patent landscape reports in pharmaceuticals.

Note: For exact claim language and legal status updates, access the official Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.