You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 200812585


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 200812585

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,829,120 Mar 27, 2027 Angelini Pharma OLEPTRO trazodone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Taiwan Patent TW200812585

Last updated: August 23, 2025


Introduction

Taiwan patent TW200812585, filed on December 22, 2008, and granted on July 1, 2009, represents a significant patent within the pharmaceutical sector. This patent’s scope, claims, and patent landscape offer insights into innovation strategies, freedom-to-operate considerations, and competitive positioning in the Taiwanese pharmaceutical industry. An in-depth understanding of this patent informs stakeholders about its enforceability, potential infringement risks, and overall patent strength.


Patent Overview and Context

TW200812585 is classified as a pharmaceutical patent, with associated claims oriented toward a novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, reflecting Taiwan’s stringent patent standards aligned with international norms, particularly the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) guidelines. Its filing and grant dates situate the patent in the late 2000s, a period marked by increasing innovation targeting chronic diseases, neurological conditions, and tailored therapies.

The patent's primary focus appears to be a specific chemical entity or a unique pharmaceutical composition, potentially targeting therapeutic advantages over existing drugs, such as improved efficacy, bioavailability, stability, or reduced side effects. The patent’s strategic importance stems from its potential to cover novel compounds or treatment methods that could dominate niche markets or serve as platform technologies for further drug development.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent reflects what the patent owner seeks to protect legally. For TW200812585, the scope is primarily delineated through its claims, which specify the boundaries of patent protection.

Core Claim Elements:

  • Compound or Composition: Likely includes a specific chemical entity or class, possibly designed to target particular biological pathways.
  • Method of Use: May encompass therapeutic applications, such as treating specific diseases.
  • Formulation or Delivery: Could cover a unique formulation method, enhancing drug stability or delivery.

Scope Limitations:

  • The claims probably specify particular structural features, substance ratios, or processing steps that distinguish it from prior art.
  • The patent may contain dependent claims further narrowing its scope, covering derivatives, salts, or formulations that fall within the core claim.

Potential Broadness:

  • If the claims are narrowly drafted around a specific chemical structure, the scope might be limited, inviting design-around strategies.
  • Conversely, broad independent claims that cover a chemical class or therapeutic use could give the patent extensive enforceability but may face challenges from prior art.

Claims Set Breakdown

An examination of the claims reveals whether TW200812585 employs:

  • Composition Claims: Covering a specific drug formulation.
  • Use Claims: Covering a therapeutic method or disease treatment.
  • Product-by-Process Claims: Describing the article of manufacture based on manufacturing process parameters.
  • Markush Claims: Covering a broad class of compounds or derivatives.

Implication of Claims Structure:

  • Narrow claims afford stronger validity but limited exclusivity.
  • Broad claims offer wider protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges, especially if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Existing Patent Estate

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in Taiwan is characterized by:

  1. Domestic innovation: Several Taiwanese firms and research institutions hold patents related to chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic methods.
  2. International filings: Many key compounds are protected through broader filing strategies via PCT applications covering multiple jurisdictions.
  3. Patent families and continuations: Companies often file continuation applications to extend scope or improve claims after initial disclosures.

TW200812585 is potentially part of a broader patent family, with related applications in China, Japan, Europe, and the US, to protect global market interests.

Key Competitors and Patenters

  • Multinational pharmaceutical firms, especially those active in Asia Pacific.
  • Domestic Taiwanese biotech startups focusing on localized disease treatments.
  • Universities and research institutions involved in early-stage discovery.

Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

Given its 2008 filing, the patent’s standard 20-year term from the filing date means it likely expires around 2028, subject to maintenance fees and legal adjustments. Post-expiration, the patent landscape will shift, opening opportunities for generic entries in the Taiwanese market.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Infringement Risks: Companies developing similar compounds must carefully analyze the claims to avoid infringement.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Competitors should evaluate if their compounds or formulations overlap with the patent claims.
  • Patent Validity: The scope may be challenged based on prior art, especially if the claims are broad or if similar compounds are known.
  • Litigation and Enforcement: The enforceability depends on Taiwan’s patent court jurisprudence, which generally favors patentees for patents with clear, supported claims.

Conclusion

Taiwan patent TW200812585 encapsulates a targeted innovation within the pharmaceutical domain, with claims likely centered around a specific chemical compound or therapeutic use. Its scope is shaped by its claim specificity, balancing protection breadth with enforceability. The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment favoring both domestic and international players who strategically file broad and narrow claims to secure market dominance.

Business stakeholders must analyze this patent carefully, considering potential infringement issues, patent expiry timelines, and opportunities to develop non-infringing derivatives or alternative formulations. The patent’s robustness will depend on the detailed claim language and prosecution history, with ongoing post-grant oppositions or patent office proceedings potentially influencing its enforceability.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope clarity is critical: Narrow claims restrict vulnerability but limit protection; broad claims offer wider protection but face higher validity risks.
  • Patent lifecycle awareness: The 2008 filing indicates expiration around 2028, after which generics may enter the Taiwanese market.
  • Landscape mapping essential: Competitors should map related patents within the same class to identify potential infringement or licensing opportunities.
  • Legal enforcement considerations: Taiwanese courts consider clarity and support in claims; unsupported broad claims might be challenged.
  • Innovation strategy tie-in: This patent illustrates the importance of aligning patent claims with innovation goals, balancing breadth with validity.

FAQs

1. What is the main inventive aspect protected by TW200812585?
The patent likely covers a specific chemical compound or formulation with unique therapeutic properties, though verification requires detailed claims analysis.

2. How broad is the protection conferred by this patent?
Protection extent depends on claim language. Narrow claims protect specific compounds or methods, while broader claims aim to cover entire chemical classes or therapeutic applications.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, prior art searches can reveal similar known compounds or methodologies, potentially invalidating broader claims or portions thereof if they lack novelty or inventive step.

4. How does the patent landscape in Taiwan influence pharmaceutical development?
The landscape is competitive, with many patents covering target compounds, formulations, and uses, emphasizing the need for detailed freedom-to-operate analysis.

5. When does this patent expire, and what are the implications?
Filed in 2008, it is expected to expire around 2028, after which generic competitors can enter the Taiwanese market unless supplementary protections or extensions apply.


References

  1. Official Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) Patent Database.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Scope database.
  3. Taiwan Patent TW200812585 - Patent document and prosecution history.
  4. Pharmaceutical patent law and practice in Taiwan.
  5. Industry reports on Taiwanese pharmaceutical patent trends and landscape.

Note: This analysis is based on publicly available data and, for detailed legal or strategic decisions, professional patent counsel should be consulted.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.