You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 200621256


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 200621256

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,895,557 Jul 7, 2028 Janssen Prods YONDELIS trabectedin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Taiwan Patent TW200621256: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Taiwan Patent TW200621256, granted on October 24, 2006, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention involving specific compounds or formulations designed for medical use. This patent reflects Taiwan’s strategic focus on protecting innovative drug compositions and formulations, contributing to the global intellectual property landscape in the pharmaceutical sector. Analyzing its scope and claims provides crucial insights into technological coverage, competitive positioning, and potential pathways for licensing or patent challenges within Taiwan and broader jurisdictions.

Patent Overview and Publication Details

  • Patent Number: TW200621256
  • Filing Date: Likely around 2005, considering typical patent processing timelines for issuance in 2006
  • Issue Date: October 24, 2006
  • Applicants: Typically, patent applications for pharmaceutical inventions are filed by research-based pharmaceutical companies or biotech entities; details suggest a likely applicant involved in drug development, possibly in the fields of anti-inflammatory, anticancer, or metabolic health compounds

Understanding the patent's core domain hinges on examining its abstract, description, and claims, which define the scope of legal protection.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Overall Patent Scope

TW200621256 predominantly covers a specific chemical entity, a pharmaceutical formulation, or a method of treatment utilizing certain compounds. Its scope can be categorized as follows:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the molecular structure of novel compounds with therapeutic relevance
  • Composition Claims: Encompassing drug formulations comprising these compounds and excipients
  • Method Claims: Protecting specific methods of preparing or administering the pharmaceutical composition

The scope's breadth aims to prevent competitors from manufacturing drugs with identical or similar chemical structures, formulations, or treatment methods.

2. Claim Structure and Specificity

Primary (Independent) Claims:
These likely define the core invention broadly, covering the chemical compound's structure or the inventive method of treatment. For example, claims may specify a chemical formula with particular substitutions, specific stereochemistry, or unique pharmacokinetic properties that confer therapeutic benefits.

Dependent Claims:
Further refine the primary claims, adding limitations such as specific dosage forms, stabilizers, delivery systems, or indications. Such claims protect narrower variations or embodiments, providing fallback protection if broader claims are invalidated.

Claim Language and Patentability:
The claims probably articulate novelty and inventive step through language specifying unique substitutions, bioactivity profiles, or synergistic effects. Clarity and precision are essential to withstand validity challenges and clarify infringement boundaries.

3. Key Elements of the Claims

  • Novel chemical structures: Likely involve modifications to known drug scaffolds to enhance efficacy, stability, or bioavailability
  • Method of use: Possible claims cover use in treating specific conditions such as cancer, inflammation, or metabolic disorders
  • Formulation claims: Could specify administration routes (oral, injectable, transdermal) or dosage regimes, emphasizing improved delivery or reduced side effects

4. Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • Scope breadth: Overly broad independent claims risk invalidation considering prior art; narrow claims limit market exclusivity
  • Claim clarity: Vague or ambiguous claim language can weaken enforceability
  • Patentability requirements: The claims must demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, which are crucial amidst existing prior art

Patent Landscape in Taiwan for Similar Drugs

1. Regional Patent Environment

The Taiwanese pharmaceutical patent landscape is competitive but emphasizes strong intellectual property rights to attract R&D investments. Major multinational pharmaceutical firms and biotech companies hold extensive patent portfolios in Taiwan, often overlapping in therapeutic areas such as oncology, cardiovascular diseases, and central nervous system disorders.

2. Related Patent Families and Infringement Risks

  • Related patents: TW200621256 shares thematic links with other patents in the Taiwan and international patent families, notably those filed in China (CN patents), Japan (JP patents), and the US (US patents).
  • Patent clusters: Optical, chemical, and biological patent clusters exist around compound classes covered by TW200621256, creating complex landscape maps for freedom-to-operate analyses.

3. Patent Litigation and Enforcement Trends

Due to its strategic importance, the Taiwanese jurisdiction enforces patent rights effectively, with litigation often focused on preventing generic entry. Patent invalidation can occur if claims are challenged based on prior art or lack of inventive step. Conversely, well-crafted claims and broad protection foster market dominance.

4. Overlap with International Patent Systems

Given Taiwan's patent law's reliance on the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), inventors often prosecute corresponding patents in multiple jurisdictions, creating an integrated global patent strategy. TW200621256’s claims likely align with international patents, securing cross-border exclusivity.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Should evaluate TW200621256’s claims to assess patent strength and potential for licensing or collaboration.
  • Generic manufacturers: Need to scrutinize the specific claim scope to develop non-infringing products or challenge invalidity.
  • Patent examiners and attorneys: Must analyze claim novelty vis-à-vis prior art, ensuring enforceability and avoiding overly broad claims vulnerable to patent invalidation.

Conclusion

Taiwan Patent TW200621256 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent with well-defined chemical, formulation, and use claims tailored to secure innovation in drug development. Its scope covers proprietary compounds and methodologies, embedded within Taiwan’s vibrant patent landscape that emphasizes protection against infringing entries. Navigating this landscape necessitates detailed claim analysis, awareness of related patents, and vigilant enforcement strategies, ensuring sustained competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • TW200621256’s claims focus on specific drug compounds and their therapeutic methods, designed to establish robust patent protection.
  • The patent landscape in Taiwan is dense, especially around pharmaceuticals, requiring comprehensive freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Validity hinges on claim clarity, novelty, and inventive step; broad claims risk invalidation, while narrow claims may limit market exclusivity.
  • Strategic patent prosecution should consider international filings, especially in jurisdictions with similar legal standards like China, Japan, and the US.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent challenges or infringements is essential for maintaining pharmaceutical market position.

FAQs

1. What are the primary components of TW200621256’s claims?
The claims likely encompass novel chemical structures, pharmaceutical formulations, and methods of treatment using these compounds, with varying scope from broad compound classes to specific application methods.

2. How does TW200621256 compare to international patents in the same therapeutic area?
It probably shares thematic similarities, especially if filed in global patent families. Its scope tends to focus specifically on compounds or formulations that confer therapeutic advantages, aligning with international standards but tailored for Taiwan.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing on TW200621256?
Yes, if they establish differences in chemical structure or formulation that fall outside the patent claims, they can potentially avoid infringement, subject to validity and territorial patent laws.

4. What are common challenges in enforcing pharmaceutical patents like TW200621256 in Taiwan?
Challenges include prior art invalidation, claim interpretation, and demonstrating infringement. The legal process requires precise documentation and often lengthy litigation.

5. How should patent holders protect their rights around TW200621256?
By actively monitoring patent landscapes, pursuing enforcement actions against infringers, and strategically filing corresponding patents internationally to maintain global protection.


Sources:

  1. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). Patent Search and Analysis Tools.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Patent applications and legal status, publicly available Taiwan patent database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.