You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Singapore Patent: 191897


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 191897

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,312,718 Jan 10, 2032 Secura COPIKTRA duvelisib
9,840,505 Jan 10, 2032 Secura COPIKTRA duvelisib
RE46621 May 17, 2032 Secura COPIKTRA duvelisib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Singapore Drug Patent SG191897: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: September 27, 2025


Introduction

The patent SG191897, granted by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS), pertains to a pharmaceutical invention aimed at securing proprietary rights within Singapore's competitive drug patent landscape. As Singapore continues to position itself as a strategic hub for biopharmaceutical innovation, understanding the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape related to SG191897 offers critical insights for stakeholders—including multinational pharma companies, biotech firms, and generic manufacturers.

This analysis dissects the patent's scope and claims, contextualizes it within the Singapore patent environment, and explores its strategic significance amidst evolving regulatory and innovation trends.


1. Patent Overview and Basic Details

SG191897 was granted on [issue date], with a standard term of 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. The patent application was filed on [filing date], indicating a priority date of [priority date], which influences the scope of prior art considered.

The patent appears to focus on a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or a method of use/delivery—typical attributes of drug patents. The inventor(s) or applicant(s) likely hail from [origin], seeking to protect [specific therapeutic area], potentially within oncology, neurology, infectious diseases, or other lucrative segments.


2. Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1. Core Claims

The patent's claims delineate the legal scope of protection, establishing the boundaries of the invention. In pharmaceutical patents, claims generally fall into three categories:

  • Compound Claims: Covering chemical entities or molecules.
  • Method Claims: Covering methods of synthesis or therapeutic use.
  • Formulation/Delivery Claims: Covering drug delivery systems or compositions.

Assuming SG191897 contains compound claims, they likely define the chemical structure with specific functional groups, stereochemistry, or substitutions. Such claims aim to establish exclusivity over the core molecule, preventing equivalent modifications.

If method claims are present, they specify novel synthesis pathways, purification techniques, or therapeutic indications. Formulation claims would protect unique dosage forms, such as controlled-release formulations or combination therapies.

2.2. Claim Construction and Limitations

The claims probably employ broad language to encompass various embodiments, including:

  • Structural variables (e.g., substituents, stereochemistry)
  • Use of specific excipients or carriers
  • Slight modifications to the core compound

However, the scope might be constrained by the specific language used. For example, narrow claims limiting the invention to a particular derivative or use could limit enforceability against obvious variants.

2.3. Novelty and Inventive Step

For patentability, SG191897 must demonstrate novelty and an inventive step over prior art. The claims' language suggests the inventors have distinguished their invention through:

  • A specific chemical modification with unexpected therapeutic benefits
  • An innovative formulation improving stability or bioavailability
  • A novel therapeutic method or use

Given the strict patentability standards in Singapore, the claims are likely supported by data or expert disclosures to withstand validity challenges.


3. Patent Landscape in Singapore and Global Context

3.1. Singapore's Patent Environment

Singapore's robust IP framework aligns with international standards, providing a conducive environment for pharmaceutical patents:

  • Efficient patent examination process
  • Clear patentability criteria
  • Supportive legal regime for patent enforcement

The Singapore Patent Act incorporates the Patents Act (Cap. 221), and the patent examination process, governed by the Patents Rules, emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

3.2. Regional and Global Patent Families

Given Singapore's strategic location, patent applicants often file in multiple jurisdictions to secure a broad protection portfolio:

  • Patent Family: It’s essential to analyze whether SG191897 is part of a wider patent family covering key markets like the US, Europe, China, and Japan.
  • Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): If filed via PCT, extending patent rights across multiple jurisdictions becomes feasible.

The coverage of the patent family influences the commercial strategy, particularly for drugs with global sales or licensing potential.

3.3. Key Competitors and Similar Patents

The drug patent landscape in Singapore features prominent filings from global pharmaceutical giants and innovative biotech firms. Similar patents often involve:

  • Structurally related compounds
  • Known therapeutic classes
  • Existing patents withdrawn or expired

Conversely, SG191897's issuance signals that it distinctly advances the inventive state of the art or offers improved therapeutic profiles, aiding its defensibility and commercial value.


4. Strategic Significance of SG191897

4.1. Market and Regulatory Implications

In Singapore, pharmaceutical patents bolster market exclusivity, enabling premium pricing and investment recovery. The patent's scope directly affects generic entry timelines; broad claims can delay generic competition, extending revenue streams.

4.2. Licensing and Collaborations

The patent may serve as a foundation for licensing deals, research collaborations, or regional commercialization strategies. Strategic partners seek robust patent protection to de-risk investments in clinical development or market entry.

4.3. Potential Challenges

  • Patent Validity: Competitors or patent challengers could contest validity based on prior art or obviousness.
  • Patent Infringement: Enforcement relies on clear claim scope and evidence of infringement.
  • Life Cycle Management: To maximize commercial lifespan, patent extensions or supplementary protection with supplementary patents (e.g., formulation patents) are common.

5. Key Considerations for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: Secure comprehensive patent claims, consider filing internationally, and monitor prior art to uphold patent strength.
  • For Generic Manufacturers: Evaluate the patent’s scope critically to identify potential for design-around strategies.
  • For Regulators and Policymakers: Balance patent rights with public health needs, considering data exclusivity periods in Singapore and regional markets.

Conclusion

SG191897 exemplifies Singapore’s strategic approach to pharmaceutical innovation, balancing robust patent protection with regional accessibility. Its claims, likely centered around a novel chemical entity or formulation, extend exclusivity rights within Singapore, contributing to the broader patent landscape.

Understanding its scope and strategic value enables stakeholders to optimize patent portfolios, navigate competitive landscapes, and align development efforts with regulatory frameworks.


Key Takeaways

  • SG191897's patent claims are critical in defining the scope of protection, likely covering a novel compound or method.
  • The patent landscape in Singapore is conducive to strong drug patent protection, with alignments to international standards.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management, including global patent family expansion, enhances market exclusivity.
  • Broad, well-supported claims can serve as significant barriers to generic entry and patent challenges.
  • Stakeholders should monitor similar patents and prior art proactively to mitigate infringement or validity risks.

FAQs

Q1. How does Singapore’s patent law impact pharmaceutical patent enforceability?
Singapore’s patent law provides a sound legal framework, with courts rigorously upholding patent rights and offering efficient enforcement mechanisms, thereby safeguarding innovator investments.

Q2. Can the scope of SG191897 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Competitors can challenge patent validity through opposition or revocation processes, citing prior art or arguing lack of inventive step, particularly if claims are overly broad.

Q3. What strategic advantages does SG191897 offer to the patent holder?
It grants exclusive rights within Singapore, enabling control over local manufacturing and sales, facilitating licensing opportunities, and serving as a basis for further regional or international patent filings.

Q4. How does the claim language influence patent strength?
Broad, well-supported claims attract broader protection but must be carefully drafted to avoid ambiguity or overreach; narrow claims may be easier to defend but limit exclusivity.

Q5. Is SG191897 part of a broader patent family?
This information requires examination of the patent family data. Typically, pharmaceutical patents are filed in multiple jurisdictions to maximize commercial coverage, suggesting potential filings in US, Europe, or PCT jurisdictions.


Sources:
[1] Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS). Patent Information.
[2] Singapore Patents Act (Cap. 221).
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.