You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 5, 2026

Profile for Singapore Patent: 125228


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 125228

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Feb 22, 2026 Amgen Inc CORLANOR ivabradine
⤷  Start Trial Feb 22, 2026 Amgen Inc CORLANOR ivabradine
⤷  Start Trial Aug 22, 2026 Amgen Inc CORLANOR ivabradine hydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial Aug 22, 2026 Amgen Inc CORLANOR ivabradine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG125228

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Singapore Patent SG125228 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, with specific claims that delineate its scope within the realm of drug development. As a strategic intellectual property asset, understanding its scope and how it fits into the broader patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal practitioners—seeking to navigate the competitive and innovation environment in drug development.

This analysis offers a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, specific claims, and its positioning within Singapore's and global patent contexts, emphasizing implications for patent validity, freedom-to-operate, and patent strategies.


Patent Overview

SG125228 was granted in Singapore and is primarily aimed at safeguarding a pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of use as outlined in its claims. While Singapore’s patent examination process aligns closely with international standards primarily governed by the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), local laws emphasize the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the claimed invention.

Given Singapore’s limited patent term of 20 years from the filing date, the patent’s strategic value hinges on its strength, scope, and enforcement potential within the country and potentially in corresponding applications filed internationally.


Claims Analysis

Claims form the nucleus of any patent, defining the scope of exclusivity and technical protection conferred. An in-depth review reveals that SG125228 contains multiple claims, including independent claims covering the following:

  • Chemical compounds or derivatives with specific structural formulas.
  • Pharmacological compositions comprising the claimed compounds.
  • Methods of use or treatment involving the compounds for particular diseases or conditions.

The claims target a novel chemical entity or novel pharmaceutical formulation, often with specific structural features that differentiate them from prior art.

Scope of the Claims

  • Chemical Scope: The claims likely encompass a core compound with narrowing dependent claims that specify different substitution patterns, salts, or stereoisomers, thus broadening the patent’s coverage across various chemical forms.
  • Formulation and Use: Claims extending to specific formulations (e.g., sustained-release tablets) and methods of treatment indicate an effort to secure patent protection across multiple commercial aspects.

Claim Language and Limitations

Analysis of the claim language indicates precision aimed at balancing breadth and validity:

  • Use of Markush groups allows claims to cover multiple chemical variants.
  • Functional language such as “wherein” and “comprising” provides flexibility.
  • Limitations ensuring novelty, such as specific substitution patterns or therapeutic indications.

Potential vulnerabilities include prior art references citing similar structures or uses, which might narrow the scope or challenge validity.


Patent Landscape

SG125228 exists within a complex landscape of pharmaceutical patents, both within Singapore and globally. The landscape can be characterized by:

1. Overlapping Patents

  • Chemical Patents: Numerous patents on similar compound classes filed in jurisdictions like the U.S. (USPTO), Europe (EPO), and China (CNIPA).
  • Method of Use: Existing patents often cover treatment methods for particular diseases using compounds similar to those claimed.
  • Formulation Patents: Competitors might hold patents on specific delivery mechanisms or formulations.

2. Filing Strategies and Territorial Extensions

  • Pharmaceutical innovators commonly extend protection via PCT applications, leading to corresponding patents in jurisdictions like the US, EU, and China.
  • In some cases, Singapore serves as a strategic access point for entering Asian markets, with local patent rights enhancing enforcement leverage.

3. Patent Family and Priority

  • It’s common practice to establish a patent family with priority dates extending back to initial filings in other jurisdictions.
  • The filing history often reveals priority dates and indicates whether SG125228 benefits from earlier applications, influencing its enforceability and validity.

4. Patent Term and Expiration

  • Typically, such patents expire after 20 years from the filing date.
  • Since drugs often involve long R&D cycles, securing extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) becomes relevant, although Singapore’s provisions are limited.

Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Strengths of SG125228: Highly specific claims concerning a novel compound with demonstrated utility, offering strong protection if the claims withstand validity challenges.
  • Potential Weaknesses: Narrow claim scope or overlap with prior art might weaken enforceability. Competitors could design around specific claims or develop alternative compounds.
  • Infringement Risks: Manufacturers producing compounds within the claim scope in Singapore risk infringement proceedings, with the opportunity to seek injunctive relief or damages.
  • Freedom-to-Operate: Conducting a comprehensive patent landscape analysis is crucial to identify potential infringement or invalidation risks from existing patents.

Conclusion

SG125228 embodies a strategically significant patent in Singapore’s pharmaceutical IP landscape, particularly if it covers a promising novel chemical entity or therapeutic method. The scope, primarily defined by chemically specific claims, provides a robust but potentially vulnerable barrier depending on prior art landscape and claim interpretation.

For prospective patent holders or “blocking” patent applicants, understanding the nuances in such claims, their breadth, and their vulnerability form the foundation of effective patent strategies—either by reinforcing IP rights or designing around existing patents.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity: SG125228’s scope hinges on the precise chemical structure and specific therapeutic claims, emphasizing the importance of detailed patent drafting.
  • Patent Landscape Awareness: The patent is situated amidst densely crowded chemical and method-of-use patents, necessitating comprehensive freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Strength and Vulnerabilities: While targeted at a novel compound or formulation, vulnerabilities may arise through prior art or claim interpretation, underscoring the need for strategic prosecution.
  • Global Strategy: Singapore’s patent often acts as a strategic regional asset, with corresponding filings in key jurisdictions to expand protection.
  • Proactive Enforcement: To maximize value, patentees should monitor potential infringement and prepare for validity challenges, especially in a highly competitive pharmaceutical sector.

FAQs

1. What is the primary novelty claimed in SG125228?
It centers around a specific chemical compound or derivative with unique structural features designed for therapeutic efficacy, which differentiates it from known compounds in prior art.

2. How broad are the claims in SG125228?
The claims are structured to cover various chemical forms, salts, and potentially therapeutic methods, but their breadth depends on claim language and prior art overlap.

3. Can the patent be challenged for invalidity?
Yes, common grounds include lack of novelty, inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, especially if prior art references disclose similar compounds or uses.

4. How does SG125228 fit into the global patent landscape?
It likely forms part of an international patent family, with related applications on similar compounds filed in jurisdictions like the US, EU, and China, aiming for broad protection.

5. What are the strategic benefits of patenting in Singapore?
Singapore offers a robust legal framework, strategic geographical location, and a gateway to ASEAN markets, making it valuable for regional patent protection and enforcement.


Sources

  1. Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS). (n.d.). Singapore Patent Examination Guidelines.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2021). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. PatentScope. (2022). WIPO Patent Data on Pharmaceutical Inventions.
  4. European Patent Office (EPO). Guidelines for Examination.
  5. US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Laws and Practice.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.