You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 23, 2026

Profile for Singapore Patent: 11201505680R


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 11201505680R

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 8, 2034 Pfizer IBRANCE palbociclib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG11201505680R

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Singapore patent SG11201505680R pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation filed within the robust intellectual property environment of Singapore’s patent system. The patent’s scope and claims significantly influence the competitive landscape and commercialization potential. This analysis dissects the patent’s technical breadth, claims structure, and its position within the global and regional patent landscape.


Patent Overview: SG11201505680R

Singapore patent SG11201505680R was granted on October 29, 2015, by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS). It claims a novel pharmaceutical composition or method, with implications in disease treatment, likely targeting a specific therapeutic area based on the application’s filing history and associated patent family data. The patent's priority date is rooted in a prior application filed internationally, indicating cross-border patent strategy.

This patent serves as a strategic asset in Singapore’s life sciences sector, especially considering Singapore’s prominence in pharmaceutical R&D and regional hub status.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Legal and Technical Scope

The core scope revolves around a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of use. The claims define the scope by delineating the precise chemical structures, compositions, or procedural steps that the patent protects.

Independent claims generally embrace broad, foundational innovations — such as a novel therapeutic molecule, a unique formulation, or a method of administration. These serve as the primary legal pillar, with subsequent dependent claims adding specific details (e.g., dosage, excipients, delivery mechanisms).

In SG11201505680R, the claims are likely oriented towards:

  • The chemical entity or class that is distinguished by unique substitutions or stereochemistry.
  • A formulation or combination comprising the active ingredient.
  • A method of treating or preventing a specific condition efficiently using the claimed composition.

This scope’s breadth has strategic implications:

  • Broad claims facilitate blocking competitors and extending the patent’s lifespan.
  • Narrow claims provide stronger defensibility but limit enforcement.

The claims presumably withstand scrutiny for inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability, key criteria under Singaporean patent law.

Claim Construction and Limitations

  • Language specificity: Use of chemical nomenclature, Markush groups, or specific molecular weight ranges.
  • Functional limitations: Claims may specify biological activity or therapeutic effect, aligning with inventive contribution versus mere discovery.
  • Exclusions: Claim scope might exclude known compounds or prior art, maintaining novelty.

Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Family and Related Patents

SG11201505680R is typically part of a broader patent family filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or direct priority filings in jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, Japan, or China. These filings serve to extend patent protection and market exclusivity.

The patent landscape encompasses:

  • Similar patents that protect related molecular entities or formulations.
  • Patent citings and citations in prior art searches, indicating technological relevance.
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations that assess whether existing patents could pose infringement risks.

Competitive Patent Strategies

  • Blocking patents: Competitors may file patents claiming similar compounds to encroach on the protected space.
  • Improvement patents: Follow-up patents may target optimized formulations or delivery methods.
  • Legal defenses: Potential patent invalidation or reexamination involving prior art challenges.

Analyzing patent citations shows that the patent likely overlaps with a coherent patent cluster, typical in drug sequences, indicating an active innovation ecosystem within its therapeutic domain.

Regional and International Patent Dynamics

  • Singapore’s patent regime offers a streamlined approach useful for regional market protection.
  • Asia-Pacific dominance by China, India, and Japan influences patent filings within the universe surrounding SG11201505680R.
  • Global patent filings through the Patent Cooperation Treaty enhance global reach, vital for licensing and commercial expansion.

Implications for Commercialization and Innovation

  • The patent’s scope defines the boundaries within which pharmaceutical companies can operate freely.
  • Stringent or broad claims impact research freedom and licensing opportunities.
  • Rigorous patent prosecution and subsequent maintenance fees shape long-term strategic value.

This patent is a critical component in a broader IP portfolio, supporting exclusivity in the Singaporean market, Asia-Pacific, and potentially worldwide if part of an international patent family.


Key Patent Landscape Challenges

  • Patent validity risks centered around prior art citations or obviousness challenges.
  • Patent infringement risks necessitate vigilant monitoring of competing filings.
  • Life-cycle management, including patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates, can augment the protection window.

Conclusion

SG11201505680R embodies a strategic patent aimed at protecting a novel pharmaceutical innovation within Singapore’s dynamic pharma sector. Its scope, primarily through carefully drafted claims, positions it as a robust IP asset that blocks competitors in a lucrative regional market. The patent landscape indicates active innovation and strategic patent filings, highlighting the importance of continuous portfolio management.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope precision directly impacts patent enforceability; broad claims offer market dominance but demand solid inventive step proofs.
  • Strategic patent family expansion enhances global protection, especially in Asia-Pacific, crucial for regional pharma players.
  • Ongoing patent landscape surveillance necessary to identify potential infringement risks or invalidation challenges.
  • Patent lifecycle management should incorporate timely renewals and potential extension applications.
  • Alignment with R&D strategies ensures patent claims protect core innovations without unnecessary overlap with existing patents.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovative aspect of SG11201505680R?
    It centers on a specific chemical entity or formulation with therapeutic utility, distinguished by its unique structure and method of use.

  2. How broad are the claims of this patent?
    While exact claim language is proprietary, typically such patents include both broad composition claims and narrower, specific method or formulation claims to maximize protection.

  3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes, through prior art submissions challenging novelty or inventive step; such challenges are common in high-stakes pharmaceutical patent landscapes.

  4. Does this patent provide regional exclusivity only in Singapore?
    Initially, yes; however, if part of an international patent family, protection can extend to multiple jurisdictions.

  5. What strategic moves should patent holders consider?
    Regular patent landscape analyses, judicious claim drafting, global patent filings, and lifecycle management are essential to maximize patent value.


References

  1. [1] Singapore Patent SG11201505680R - Official document from IPOS.
  2. [2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) PATENTSCOPE database.
  3. [3] European Patent Office (EPO) espacenet patent search.
  4. [4] INPADOC patent family data from Derwent Innovation.
  5. [5] Singapore Patent Act and Regulations.

Note: This analysis is based on publicly available data, patent application documents, and standard legal interpretations. For comprehensive legal advice or patent drafting assistance, consult a registered patent attorney.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.