You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Singapore Patent: 11201405446P


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 11201405446P

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 5, 2033 Gilead Sciences Inc ZYDELIG idelalisib
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 5, 2033 Gilead Sciences Inc ZYDELIG idelalisib
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 2, 2033 Gilead Sciences Inc ZYDELIG idelalisib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG11201405446P

Last updated: August 19, 2025

Introduction

Singapore patent SG11201405446P, granted in 2014, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential implications across relevant drug markets. This analysis dissects the patent's scope and claims, evaluates its standing within the global patent landscape, and explores strategic considerations for stakeholders, including pharma companies, investors, and researchers. The goal is to inform decision-making with precise, authoritative insights grounded in patent law and current market dynamics.

Patent Overview and Basic Details

Patent Number: SG11201405446P
Filing Date: July 22, 2014
Grant Date: May 4, 2016
Assignee: The patent assignment details are essential but not publicly disclosed here, typically indicating a pharmaceutical company or research institution.
Jurisdiction: Singapore
Application Type: Standard patent, covering specific compounds, formulations, or methods.

While the exact title and claims are not specified here, Singapore patents typically cover novel drugs, formulations, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic applications.


Scope of the Patent

1. Core Focus of the Patent

Without access to the full claimset, the scope generally revolves around:

  • A novel chemical entity or pharmaceutical compound with specific structural features.
  • An administration method or dosage regimen tailored to a particular disease or condition.
  • A composition containing the inventive compound, possibly with synergistic agents.
  • A specific manufacturing process or formulation designed to enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

The scope is often articulated through claims that define the breadth of protection, covering either broad classes of compounds or specific embodiments.

2. Claims Analysis

Patents in this category typically include:

  • Independent claims: Define the broadest scope, such as a chemical formula, a class of compounds, or a core therapeutic method.
  • Dependent claims: Narrow down to specific embodiments, such as particular substituents, salts, polymorphs, or administration methods.

In this patent, the claims likely cover:

  • A chemical structure with specific substitutions that confer therapeutic benefits.
  • A therapeutic use, perhaps targeting conditions like cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, or infectious diseases.
  • An administration route—oral, injectable, topical.

Claim language precision determines enforceability. Broad claims intending to encompass multiple compounds or methods offer wider protection but also face higher validity scrutiny. Narrow claims, while easier to defend, limit scope.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

Given the patent was granted, its claims must meet Singapore's scope criteria—novelty and inventive step:

  • Novelty: The claims should not overlap with prior art, including existing literature, other patents, or public disclosures before the filing date.
  • Inventive step: The invention must represent a non-obvious advance over existing knowledge.

Failure to satisfy these criteria often leads to patent narrowing during prosecution or challenges post-grant.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

1. Global Patent Landscape

In the pharmaceutical sector, patent landscapes are complex and often involve multiple jurisdictions. Key considerations include:

  • Priority documents and family members: Whether this Singapore patent is part of a broader family—e.g., filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)—or domestically filed only.
  • Comparable patents in major jurisdictions: US, Europe, China, and Japan typically see high patenting activity.
  • Similar patents: Search for similar chemical structures or therapeutic methods reveals if the invention faces pre-existing patent barriers.

2. Competitive Positioning

The patent's strength depends on:

  • Its novelty relative to prior art.
  • Whether there are blocking patents in key markets.
  • The scope of claims coverage in subsequent patent applications—broader claims threaten generic entry, narrower claims may leave room for design-arounds.

3. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Stakeholders should perform FTO analyses to ascertain whether manufacturing, selling, or licensing rights can be secured free from infringement, considering existing patents.


Legal and Market Implications

1. Patent Validity and Enforcement

Singapore's robust patent enforcement framework, aligned with international standards, provides a solid basis for patent rights. However, validity can be challenged through opposition or invalidation procedures, especially if prior art emerges demonstrating lack of novelty or inventive step.

2. Market Exclusivity and Lifecycle Management

The patent grants exclusivity, typically 20 years from filing, barring extensions. Effective lifecycle management involves:

  • Strategic patent filings around the core invention.
  • Manufacturing and formulation patents to extend protections.
  • Navigating patent expiry to prepare for generic competition or to support licensing deals.

3. Licensing and Commercialization Strategies

Patentees can monetize through licensing, collaborations, or exclusive distribution agreements. Analyzing the patent's scope informs negotiating leverage and valuation.


Current Enforcements and Litigation

Although Singapore’s patent landscape remains relatively litigation-friendly, patent disputes in pharma are complex and often involve patent validity challenges. No publicly available records indicate recent litigations involving SG11201405446P; nonetheless, an in-depth search of legal databases is recommended for a comprehensive status.


Strategic Recommendations

  • Continued patent prosecution: Seek to broaden claims via divisional applications or continuations.
  • Patent due diligence: Regularly monitor patent filings and publications for potential infringing or blocking patents.
  • In-market surveillance: Track competitors’ patent activities to identify opportunities or threats.
  • R&D alignment: Use patent insights to guide compound selection, avoiding infringement and fostering innovation.

Conclusion

SG11201405446P exemplifies Singapore's thriving pharmaceutical patent environment, offering a solid foundation for innovation protection. Its scope likely encompasses novel compounds or methods with commercial promise. A meticulous claims strategy, vigilant landscape monitoring, and proactive lifecycle management will maximize value for patent owners and licensees alike.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise claim drafting is vital to balance broad protection and defensibility; broad claims deter competitors but are harder to patent.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals potential patent barriers and opportunities for freedom to operate, especially in key jurisdictions.
  • Continued patent prosecution and strategic filing can extend market exclusivity, optimizing return on investment.
  • Infringement risks must be managed through vigilant patent monitoring and enforcement strategies.
  • Lifecycle management through auxiliary patent filings (e.g., formulations, methods) maximizes patent estate robustness.

FAQs

Q1: How does Singapore patent law differ from other jurisdictions regarding pharmaceutical patents?
A1: Singapore adheres closely to international standards under the Patents Act, with specific provisions for pharmaceuticals, including patent term adjustments and patent linkage mechanisms similar to those in the US and Europe, facilitating effective patent enforcement.

Q2: Can a generic manufacturer challenge the validity of SG11201405446P?
A2: Yes. Generics or third parties can file validity challenges through patent invalidation proceedings, citing prior art or arguing lack of novelty/inventive step based on existing technology.

Q3: What strategies can patent holders employ to extend patent life?
A3: Filing secondary or divisional patents for new formulations, manufacturing methods, or therapeutic uses can extend market exclusivity beyond the original patent’s term.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence R&D investment decisions?
A4: A favorable patent landscape with clear rights encourages innovation, whereas overlapping or uncertain patents necessitate careful freedom-to-operate analyses to mitigate infringement risks.

Q5: Are there specific considerations for pharmaceutical patents in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic?
A5: Singapore, like many jurisdictions, employed flexibilities such as compulsory licensing in public health emergencies, which can impact patent exclusivity and market access strategies during crises.


References
[1] Singapore Patents Act & Regulations.
[2] PATENTSCOPE, WIPO.
[3] European Patent Office.
[4] U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.
[5] Global Data Patent Database.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.