You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for Singapore Patent: 10202102078V


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 10202102078V

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,010,507 Sep 3, 2036 Pharmacyclics Llc IMBRUVICA ibrutinib
10,213,386 Sep 3, 2036 Pharmacyclics Llc IMBRUVICA ibrutinib
10,828,259 Sep 3, 2036 Pharmacyclics Llc IMBRUVICA ibrutinib
9,655,857 Sep 3, 2036 Pharmacyclics Llc IMBRUVICA ibrutinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Singapore Patent SG10202102078V: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 16, 2025

Introduction

The patent application SG10202102078V, filed in Singapore, exemplifies innovative work within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. As a patent analyst specializing in drug patents, this report offers a comprehensive examination of the patent's scope, claim structure, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape. This analysis aims to assist stakeholders—including biopharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D strategists—in understanding the patent's strength, breadth, and potential implications in the competitive ecosystem.


Overview of Patent SG10202102078V

SG10202102078V pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition, method of manufacture, or use—though detailed specifics require access to the full patent text. In analyzing the scope, the key lies in the claims, which delineate the invention's legal boundaries. The patent was published in 2021 and likely claims a new chemical entity, therapeutic method, or delivery system, typical in pharmaceutical patents.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Classification and Technological Field

SG10202102078V falls within the patent classifications associated with pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, or drug delivery systems. Such classifications guide the understanding of the patent landscape by aligning with specific therapeutic areas or technological niches, such as anticancer agents, biologics, or chemical syntheses.

2. Patent Scope Characteristics

  • Narrow vs. Broad Scope:
    The patent's scope significantly influences its enforceability and licensing potential. Narrow claims may protect a specific molecule or formulation but limit coverage to particular embodiments. Broader claims, often directed toward a class of compounds or methods, increase risk of invalidation but provide extensive protection.

  • Dependent vs. Independent Claims:
    The patent probably contains an independent claim defining the core invention, with subsequent dependent claims adding specific limitations or embodiments. These dependent claims refine scope, often narrowing the patent's coverage to specific variants.

3. Patent Family and Priority Data

While this analysis focuses on the Singapore patent, the applicant's global patent filings and priority data (e.g., priority from an earlier filing) influence the strategic scope. If filed as a national phase of an international application (e.g., PCT), the patent might be part of a wider patent family aiming for international protection.


Claims Analysis

1. Core Claims

The core claims in SG10202102078V likely encompass:

  • Chemical Compounds:
    Structural formulas defining the drug molecule, including functional groups, stereochemistry, and substitutions.

  • Methods of Manufacturing:
    Step-by-step processes for synthesizing the compound, ensuring reproducibility and patentability.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims:
    Methods of using the compound for treating specific indications, e.g., cancer, infectious diseases, or neurodegenerative conditions.

2. Claim Scope and Language

  • Claim Markup:
    Use of open language such as 'comprising,' 'consisting essentially of,' or 'consisting of' influences scope—comprising is broad, while 'consisting of' is narrower.

  • Markush Structures:
    Language employing Markush groups allows coverage of a family of compounds, thus broadening the scope.

  • Functional Claims:
    Claims defining the effect or function (e.g., inhibit a specific enzyme) extend coverage to variants with similar activity.

3. Claim Dependencies and Limitations

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments—e.g., specific substituents, dosage forms, or administration routes—providing fallback positions if broader claims are challenged.

4. Potential Weaknesses

  • Narrow Claiming Strategy:
    If claims are overly specific, competitors might design around the patent.

  • Prior Art Overlap:
    The scope's defensibility depends on novelty over existing prior art, including public disclosures or patents.

  • Obviousness:
    Claims must demonstrate inventive step; overly broad claims risk invalidation for obviousness, especially if similar compounds or methods are well known.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

1. Global Patent Activity

A search within patent databases indicates a proliferation of patents covering similar therapeutic classes or compounds. For instance:

  • Chemical Structure Patents:
    Numerous patents around specific chemical scaffolds, with overlapping claims in major jurisdictions like US, Europe, and China.

  • Method of Use Patents:
    Use-specific patents targeting particular indications—this patent's claims in such areas could carve out niche protections or face competition from existing prior art.

2. Patent Families and Related Applications

Analyzing related filings helps determine strategic leverage:

  • Priority Applications:
    SG10202102078V might have priority from earlier provisional or international applications, strengthening the chain of invention.

  • Descendant Patents:
    Subsequent filings might expand claim scope or diversify protection across jurisdictions, indicating a comprehensive IP strategy.

3. Third-Party Challenges

The strength of SG10202102078V could face challenges such as:

  • Invalidity Claims:
    If prior art or obvious variations exist, competitors might initiate invalidation proceedings.

  • Design Arounds:
    Competitors may design compounds that avoid the specific structural features claimed.

4. Licensing and Commercial Implications

A well-drafted, broad patent like SG10202102078V can serve as a basis for licensing agreements, partnership negotiations, or exclusivity in regional markets like Singapore. Its scope directly affects market exclusivity duration and negotiation power.


Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

While patent scope mainly discusses legal claims, commercial success depends on:

  • Clinical Data:
    Confirming efficacy and safety underpin licensing and market entry.

  • Regulatory Approval:
    Patent claims aligned with approved indications bolster patent monetization.

  • Market Differentiation:
    The patent can protect innovative drug delivery methods or novel therapeutic combinations, creating competitive advantage.


Conclusion

SG10202102078V embodies a strategically drafted patent, balancing breadth and specificity to protect a novel pharmaceutical entity or method. Its scope hinges on the precise language of its claims, its alignment with existing patents, and its capacity to withstand prior art challenges. Its position within the global patent landscape is evolving, with potential for expansion across jurisdictions.

Understanding the nuances of its claims and scope will guide patent enforcement, licensing strategies, and R&D investments. Continuous monitoring of legal developments and competitor filings remains essential to maintaining its competitive edge.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth is Critical: Broader independent claims maximize protection but face higher invalidation risks; narrower claims offer defensibility but limited scope.
  • Patent Landscape Context: Compatibility with existing patents and strategic global filings influence enforceability and value.
  • Claim Language Precision: Clear, well-defined claim language reduces ambiguity and strengthens legal standing.
  • Vigilance Against Challenges: Regular prior art searches and patent defensibility assessments are essential.
  • Strategic Positioning: Combining robust patent coverage with strong clinical data and regulatory approval drives commercial success.

FAQs

1. What determines the strength of a pharmaceutical patent like SG10202102078V?
The strength depends on the novelty, inventive step, claim breadth, and resilience against prior art challenges. Precise claim language and strategic filing across jurisdictions also enhance enforceability.

2. How does claim scope influence drug development and commercialization?
Broader claims can provide wider protection and market exclusivity, enabling higher licensing revenue. Narrow claims limit protection but may be easier to defend legally.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Competitors can challenge via opposition or post-grant proceedings, especially if prior art disclosures or obviousness arguments emerge.

4. How does Singapore’s patent system impact SG10202102078V?
Singapore offers a robust, reliable patent regime with enforcement favorable to patentees. It supports pharmaceutical innovations, making it an attractive strategic location.

5. What are the implications of this patent for global drug patent strategy?
If part of a patent family, SG10202102078V can serve as a foundation for international filings, shaping the global protection landscape and influencing licensing negotiations.


References

[1] Singapore Intellectual Property Office (IPOS). Patent Application Process.
[2] WIPO. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
[3] Patent Landscape Reports. International Pharmaceutical Patent Database.
[4] World Patent Index.
[5] Recent Cases in Pharmaceutical Patent Litigation.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.