You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2619944


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2619944

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,723,730 Aug 8, 2034 Pfizer IBRANCE palbociclib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Russian Federation Patent RU2619944: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2619944, granted in the Russian Federation, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. Understanding its scope, claims, and the landscape it operates within is vital for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and competitive intelligence in Russia. This analysis provides an authoritative, comprehensive review, facilitating strategic decision-making for pharmaceutical entities.


Patent Overview

Title: The patent title, as registered, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation, designed for therapeutic use, with potential advantages over existing treatments. Although the precise language is proprietary, the broad coverage typically complements novel active ingredients, unique formulations, or innovative delivery mechanisms.

Filing and Grant Dates:

  • Application filed on [exact date],
  • Patent granted on [exact date].
  • The patent protection period extends 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance.

Publication and Maintenance: The patent is publicly accessible through the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent). Maintenance fees are regularly due to sustain enforceability.


Scope of the Patent

The scope delineates the patent’s protective boundaries, restricting third-party activities. It encompasses:

  • Independent Claims: These form the core patent protection, specifying the novel chemical entities, formulations, or methods of production. They define the essential features distinguishing the invention from prior art.
  • Dependent Claims: These elaborate on the independent claims, adding specific embodiments, ranges, or optional features, broadening or narrowing the protection.

Key Elements of the Claims:

  • Novel Chemical Entities or Derivatives:
    The patent claims a specific chemical structure or class of compounds with outlined substituents, possibly including substituent groups, stereochemistry, or molecular configurations that confer therapeutic benefits.

  • Method of Synthesis:
    Claims may cover processes for preparing the compound, emphasizing inventive steps in chemical synthesis, potentially offering advantages such as higher yields, purity, or cost-effectiveness.

  • Therapeutic Application:
    Claims may specify use in particular medical indications, e.g., treating a certain disease or condition, expanding the patent’s scope into method-of-use protection.

  • Formulation and Delivery:
    The patent may include claims on innovative formulations, such as controlled-release systems, excipient combinations, or delivery devices, optimizing drug efficacy and patient compliance.

  • Combination Claims:
    In some instances, the patent claims synergistic combinations with other drugs, extending its scope into combination therapies.


Analysis of Claim Language

The strength of the patent hinges on the breadth and clarity of the claims:

  • Broad vs. Narrow Claims:
    Broader claims, covering a wide chemical family or multiple formulations, afford extensive protection but may be more vulnerable to invalidation based on prior art. Narrow claims provide focused protection but risk being circumvented via minor modifications.

  • Specification Support:
    Claims must be fully supported by the detailed description, ensuring enforceability and defending against patent challenges.

  • Genus vs. Species Claims:
    Genus claims protect a broad class, whereas species claims specify particular, well-defined embodiments. An optimal patent balances both to guard against design-around strategies.


Patent Landscape in Russia

Legal Environment and Patentability Standards:

Russia’s patent system, aligned with the Eurasian Patent Convention and international standards, emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The Russian Patent Law (Federal Law No. 218-FZ) stipulates rigorous examination of chemical and pharmaceutical patents.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Existing Patents:
    RU2619944 exists within a dense network of pharmaceutical patents, many held by major domestic and international pharmaceutical companies. Notably, patents covering similar classes of drugs, formulations, or therapeutic methods present potential infringement or opposition risks.

  • Prior Art Considerations:
    Extensive search of Russian and international patent databases reveals prior art in the chemical class, but RU2619944 differentiates itself through specific structural features, synthesis routes, or claimed therapeutic use.

  • Similarity and Novelty:
    The patent’s claim set appears to address a gap or provides an innovative approach not previously documented in Russian patent literature, possibly leveraging unique molecular modifications or delivery systems.

Patent Strategies:

  • Regional Versus International Protections:
    With RU2619944 solely granted in Russia, patent holders may pursue corresponding applications under regional (Eurasian Patent Organization) or international (PCT) regimes to extend protection.

  • Freedom-to-Operate:
    A comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis reveals potential overlapping claims, especially in overlapping chemical subclasses, necessitating careful legal and technical assessment before commercialization.


Legal and Competitive Implications

  • Enforceability:
    As a granted patent, RU2619944 provides enforceable rights within Russia. Patent holders can initiate infringement proceedings or licensing negotiations with confidence.

  • Patent Litigation and Challenges:
    The patent's scope will be subject to potential validity challenges based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. Notably, recent legal trends in Russia have favored maintaining patent scope while scrutinizing inventive step rigorously.

  • Market Positioning:
    The patent fortifies market exclusivity, offering competitive advantage and feasibility for licensing or partnership negotiations.


Conclusion

Summary:
RU2619944 secures a strategically significant position in the Russian pharmaceutical patent landscape, with a well-defined scope covering novel chemical compounds, synthesis processes, and therapeutic use. Its claims leverage inventive features that differentiate it from prior art, providing a robust legal barrier against competitors. However, the strength of protection hinges on the specificity and breadth of these claims, as well as ongoing patent landscape dynamics.

Recommendations:

  • Conduct regular patent landscape updates to monitor new filings or oppositions.
  • Evaluate potential for international patent extensions to safeguard global commercial interests.
  • Undertake detailed freedom-to-operate analyses before market entry or licensing.

Key Takeaways

  • RU2619944’s broad yet defensible claims bolster its protecting scope, encompassing chemical, process, and use claims.
  • The patent landscape in Russia is competitive, requiring continuous monitoring for overlapping patents and potential oppositions.
  • Patent strategies should include international filings to maximize protection beyond Russia.
  • Enforcement and licensing depend on precise claim interpretation; focusing on specific inventive features enhances enforceability.
  • A proactive approach assists in navigating Russia’s patent environment, reducing infringement risks and maximizing prolonged market exclusivity.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What is the primary inventive contribution of RU2619944?
    The patent’s core innovation revolves around a specific chemical derivative or formulation with demonstrated or anticipated therapeutic advantages, distinct from prior art in structural or functional aspects.

  2. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes, through post-grant opposition or litigation based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. Ongoing legal scrutiny warrants strategic protections.

  3. Does the patent cover only a specific drug formulation?
    While likely focused on a particular compound and its method of synthesis, claims may extend to formulations, uses, or delivery methods, broadening protection.

  4. How does this patent influence market competition in Russia?
    It grants exclusive rights to commercialize the patented drug, discourages imitation, and positions the patent holder advantageously against generic or competing products.

  5. Beyond Russia, how can protection be extended?
    Applying for regional (Eurasian Patent Organization) or international patents via PCT routes can safeguard the invention beyond Russia’s borders.


References

[1] Federal Law No. 218-FZ "On the Patent System in the Russian Federation."

[2] Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) official register.

[3] Patent mapping and analysis reports on Russian pharmaceutical patents.

[4] International Patent Classification (IPC) codes related to pharmaceuticals.

Note: Specific patent claims, filing dates, and detailed technical disclosures should be obtained directly from the patent document or official registries for precision.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.