You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2495662


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2495662

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,369,566 Apr 21, 2029 Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin
8,318,817 Apr 27, 2030 Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin
9,205,048 Apr 21, 2029 Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin
9,233,068 Dec 11, 2029 Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin
9,603,796 Apr 21, 2029 Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Federation Patent RU2495662

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2495662, granted in the Russian Federation, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention, marking its strategic importance within the drug patent landscape. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates its positioning within the Russian and global patent environment, and assesses its implications for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and market access.


Overview of Patent RU2495662

RU2495662 was granted on September 9, 2014, to protect a specific medicinal compound, composition, or process. While the detailed patent document is proprietary, publicly available summaries suggest it covers a novel pharmaceutical substance or formulation aimed at treating particular medical conditions with innovative efficacy, safety, or delivery mechanisms.

The patent is classified under the international patent classification (IPC) codes relevant to pharmaceuticals, often referencing compounds or processes involving chemical synthesis, formulation, or drug delivery systems. Precise IPC codes such as A61K (Medicinal preparations) or C07D (Heterocyclic compounds) are typical for such innovations, aiding in categorization within the patent landscape.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Broad vs. Specific Claims

The patent’s claims define its legal scope—be they broad or narrow significantly influence its enforceability and commercial value.

  • Core Compound/Formula Claims:
    Likely define a novel chemical entity or a specific class of compounds with therapeutic activity. These claims encompass the compound's molecular structure, stereochemistry, or specific substitution patterns, providing exclusivity over similar molecules.

  • Pharmaceutical Formulation Claims:
    Possible claims concern specific formulations—comprising the active ingredient with excipients—in particular delivery forms like tablets, capsules, or injectables.

  • Method of Use/Treatment Claims:
    May specify novel methods of treating diseases, expanding patent protection to treatment protocols or indications.

  • Process Claims:
    Cover particular synthesis routes or manufacturing steps that produce the active compound or formulation.

2. Claim Dependencies and Scope

Dependent claims refine the independent claims by specifying particular embodiments or preferred embodiments, which enhance patent enforceability while maintaining overall broad protection.

For RU2495662, the dominant claims likely target the compound’s chemical structure, with subsequent claims defining specific formulations, dosages, or therapeutic methods related to the product’s use.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s validity hinges on demonstrating novelty over prior art, including prior patents, scientific publications, or existing drugs. Given its award in 2014, the claimed invention must have presented a non-obvious technical advancement at the time, addressing gaps or limitations in existing treatments or synthesis methods.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Russian Patent Environment

Russia’s patent regime aligns with the European Patent Convention (EPC), featuring rigorous examination standards for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. RU2495662’s maintenance indicates the patentee successfully navigated these criteria.

2. Comparative Global Landscape

  • Foreign Patent Rights:
    The invention may have counterparts or similar patents filed in EPC member states, the US, China, or emerging markets, depending on strategic interests. It is common for pharmaceutical entities to file parallel patents internationally; however, local patent rights protect the product specifically in Russia.

  • Existing Patents and Prior Art:
    Prior art searches prior to the patent filing likely included chemical libraries, prior publications, or older patents, to carve out a novel niche. The current patent landscape may include similar compounds or formulations but none with identical claims, asserting the invention’s patentability.

3. Competitive and Patent Thicket Considerations

The pharmaceutical patent landscape often involves dense patent thickets to protect core active ingredients, delivery mechanisms, and manufacturing processes. RU2495662’s position within this web determines its freedom-to-operate and potential for licensing or legal challenges.


Implications for Stakeholders

1. Patent Holders

Protection conferred by RU2495662 grants market exclusivity in Russia, potentially extending to formulation-specific patents or methods if claimed. The scope defines the extent of infringement liability and licensing opportunities.

2. Generic Manufacturers

Generic producers must navigate around the patent claims, possibly designing alternative compounds, formulations, or synthesis routes. Patent expiry or licensing negotiations will influence market entry strategies.

3. Regulators and Market Access

The patent’s scope affects marketing authorizations. Exclusive rights can delay generic competition, incentivize innovation, but may also impact drug pricing and accessibility.


Key Considerations in Patent Strategy

  • Claim Interpretation:
    Clear, well-drafted claims mitigate legal disputes. Competitors interpret claims to avoid infringement or design around protected features.

  • Patent Life Cycle:
    As patents typically last 20 years from filing, the remaining term impacts commercial planning. Patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can alter effective exclusivity.

  • Patent Challenges and Litigation:
    Competitors or patent offices may challenge validity, especially if prior art emerges or claims are overly broad.


Conclusion

Patent RU2495662’s scope, centered on a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, is a key asset within the Russian drug patent landscape. Its detailed claims likely encompass chemical structures, preparation processes, and therapeutic uses, providing broad protection if well-drafted. Its strategic value derives from securing exclusive rights, deterring generic competition, and enabling licensing.

Enforcement, potential challenges, and international patent applications will influence its long-term commercial success. Stakeholders should continuously monitor the patent landscape, scrutinize claim scope, and consider legal nuances to optimize market positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity:
    The patent’s claims define precise boundaries, requiring careful analysis to gauge enforceability and design-around strategies.

  • Strategic Positioning:
    RU2495662, given its comprehensive coverage, may serve as a cornerstone patent in Russia, influencing subsequent filings or litigation.

  • Landscape Awareness:
    Mapping related patents, both domestically and internationally, is vital to assess infringement risks and identify licensing opportunities.

  • Patent Lifecycle Management:
    Monitoring patent expiry and potential extensions will be critical to sustaining market advantage.

  • Legal Safeguards:
    Robust claim drafting and vigilant patent prosecution protect against invalidity challenges and infringement.


FAQs

1. What are the main elements typically protected within a pharmaceutical patent like RU2495662?
It generally covers chemical structures, formulations, synthesis processes, and methods of use for treating specific diseases.

2. How does RU2495662 compare to similar patents in the global landscape?
Without direct correspondence, RU2495662’s novelty and scope depend on its uniqueness vis-à-vis international patents, but similar compounds and formulations are common global counterparts.

3. What strategies might competitors pursue to bypass RU2495662?
Developing alternative chemical structures, modified formulations, or different synthesis methods that do not infringe the specific claims.

4. How long is the patent protection likely to last, and what factors could influence this?
Typically 20 years from the filing date, with possible extensions. Patent validity may be challenged or invalidated, affecting its term.

5. What are the risks for generic manufacturers regarding RU2495662?
Legal challenges, patent infringement litigation, or patent expiry are primary risks influencing market entry and pricing decisions.


References

  1. Federal Service for Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT). Patent RU2495662.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). International Patent Classification records.
  3. Russian Federation Patent Laws and Guidelines.
  4. Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Trends in Russia.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.