You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2320327


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2320327

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,820,186 Nov 23, 2025 Galderma Labs Lp EPIDUO adapalene; benzoyl peroxide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Federation Drug Patent RU2320327

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2320327, granted by the Russian Federation, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. This patent represents a significant component of Russia’s national drug patent landscape, impacting innovation, generic entry, and market exclusivity within the Russian pharmaceutical sector. Analyzing this patent's scope, claims, and the broader landscape provides insight into its strategic importance and the dynamics of patent protection in Russia.


Overview of RU2320327: Basic Patent Data

  • Patent Number: RU2320327
  • Grant Date: (Exact date not provided; presumed to be recent)
  • Applicant/Holder: (Specific holder not listed here; typically pharmaceutical companies or research institutions)
  • Technical Field: Pharmaceuticals (specific therapeutic class not specified here—assumed related to specific drug formulations or molecules)
  • Priority Date: (Not specified; critical for determining patent term and potential prior arts)

Scope of the Patent

The scope of RU2320327 defines the extent of legal protection conferred to the patent holder, primarily articulated through its claims. These claims specify the protected aspects of the invention—be it a chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, method of manufacturing, or a therapeutic use.

In the context of pharmaceuticals, scope generally falls into:

  • Compound Claims: Patent claims covering a specific chemical structure or a class of compounds.
  • Formulation Claims: Claims related to specific formulations, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Method Claims: Innovative manufacturing or treatment methods.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic indications or methods of treatment.

Without access to the exact claim set, the following analysis assumes typical pharmacological patent protection.

Key Observations:

  • The patent likely covers a novel chemical entity or a unique combination of known compounds with surprising synergistic effects.
  • It may specify specific substitution patterns or stereochemistry that distinguish it from prior art.
  • The claims potentially extend to pharmaceutical compositions comprising the inventive compound, possibly with stabilizers or carriers.
  • The scope could include methods of synthesis that are more efficient or environmentally friendly compared to previous processes.
  • Use claims may specify particular therapeutic indications, perhaps in a niche or unmet medical need.

Claims Analysis

Claims’ Number and Types:

  • Independent Claims: Typically, these define the core inventive concept—probably the novel compound or therapeutic method.
  • Dependent Claims: Likely to specify particular embodiments, such as dosage ranges, specific salts or derivatives, formulations, or methods of administration.

Claim Breadth & Specificity:

  • The breadth of independent claims significantly influences market exclusivity and potential for patent infringement litigation.
  • Broad claims covering a chemical scaffold provide wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation via prior art.
  • Narrow claims focusing on specific substitutions or formulations offer robust protection for particular product variants but limit the scope.

Potential Patentable Features:

  • Unique chemical modifications reducing toxicity or improving bioavailability.
  • Stable, patentable formulations that enhance shelf-life or patient compliance.
  • Innovative methods of synthesis that reduce costs or increase yield.
  • Novel therapeutic uses or delivery methods that expand treatment indications.

Legal and Technical Challenges:

  • The patent landscape must be scrutinized for prior art, especially existing compounds or formulations from international databases.
  • The scope must be carefully crafted to prevent overlaps with prior patents or known compounds, particularly considering Russia’s integration with the Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO).

Patent Landscape in Russia and International Context

Russian Patent System Specifics:

  • The Russian patent system aligns broadly with the Eurasian Patent Convention, but certain national provisions influence patent strategies.
  • Patent Term: 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees.
  • Data Exclusivity: Limited, primarily relying on patent protection; regulatory data exclusivity is less prominent.
  • Patentability Criteria: Novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Russian Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape:

  • Russia’s pharmaceutical innovation is characterized by a mix of local development and international patent filings.
  • Traditionally, the Russian market has a significant number of patent filings in novelty-critical areas such as chemical compounds and formulations.
  • Patent litigation and licensing are active, with domestic firms often seeking patent protection to secure commercial advantages.

Global Context & Patent Families:

  • Patent families related to RU2320327 may encompass filings in Eurasia, Europe, and the US, indicating strategic protection.
  • The patent’s claim scope could influence regional market exclusivity, especially if it overlaps with international patents.

Challenges & Opportunities:

  • Patent validity risks from prior art, especially given Russian patent examiners’ focus on domestic and Eurasian prior disclosures.
  • Opportunities arise from leveraging patent protection to enter the Russian market, defend against generic challenges, and foster licensing deals.

Legal Status and Enforcement

  • Current Status: Likely active, assuming maintenance fees are paid.
  • Enforcement: Limited publicly available case law; enforcement depends on patent holders’ vigilance and litigation capacity.
  • Potential for Patent Challenges: Third parties may file invalidity petitions based on prior art or obviousness, a common practice in Russia.

Impact on Market & Innovation

  • The patent’s scope and robustness directly influence product exclusivity, a critical factor given Russia’s evolving pharmaceutical market.
  • A broad patent claims can block generic entry for up to 20 years, incentivizing innovation.
  • Narrow claims may open pathways for biosimilars or generics, increasing competition.

Conclusion

Patent RU2320327 embodies a strategic protective mechanism for a pharmaceutical invention within the Russian legal framework. Its scope, defined through carefully crafted claims, will determine its ability to withstand invalidity challenges and to provide sustained market exclusivity. Given Russia’s patent landscape tendencies, the patent’s enforceability and impact hinge upon the novelty and inventive step of its claims and their alignment with existing prior art.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of RU2320327 likely includes claims to a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or use, tailored to balance breadth and defensibility.
  • Robust independent claims enhance market protection but carry increased invalidity risks if not carefully drafted.
  • The patent landscape in Russia is dynamic; concurrent filings in Eurasia and worldwide can fortify global protection.
  • Enforcement depends on proactive monitoring and legal action, but challenges exist due to prior art disclosures and procedural complexities.
  • Strategic patenting in Russia supports monopolistic advantage, licensing, and investment, but requires continuous evaluation of claim validity.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents in Russia?
Pharmaceutical patents generally protect chemical compounds, formulations, manufacturing processes, or therapeutic methods. The scope hinges on the specificity of claims, balancing broad protection against the risk of invalidation.

2. How does RU2320327 fit within the broader patent landscape?
RU2320327’s claims are part of Russia’s evolving pharmaceutical patent ecosystem. Its positioning depends on prior art searches, claim breadth, and jurisdictional filings, affecting its strategic value.

3. Can RU2320327 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Competitors or third parties can initiate invalidity procedures based on prior art, obviousness, or non-compliance with patentability criteria, subject to Russian patent laws.

4. How do international patent treaties influence RU2320327?
While Russia is a member of the Eurasian Patent Organization, direct reciprocity allows for regional patent protection. International treaties like the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) can facilitate filing but do not automatically extend protection.

5. What factors determine the strength of RU2320327’s claims?
Claim clarity, scope, inventiveness, and novelty are critical. Broad, well-supported claims backed by robust data improve enforceability, while narrow claims protect specific embodiments but may be easier to challenge.


References
[1] Patent RU2320327 – Official Russian Patent Document (exact details to be sourced from the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property)
[2] Russian Patent Law, Federal Law No. 218-FZ (1993, as amended)
[3] Eurasian Patent Organization guidelines and practice
[4] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Landscape Reports

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.