You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2314303


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2314303

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,365,205 Apr 18, 2027 Daiichi Sankyo Inc SAVAYSA edoxaban tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Patent RU2314303

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Russian patent RU2314303, titled “Method for treating diseases associated with oxidative stress,” was granted to synthesize specialized therapeutic strategies targeting oxidative stress-related pathologies. Understanding this patent’s scope, claims, and landscape offers critical insights for pharmaceutical innovators, patent attorneys, and strategic stakeholders operating within or entering the Russian market.


Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

  • Patent Number: RU2314303
  • Grant Date: April 26, 2018
  • Filing Date: May 4, 2016
  • Applicants: Not explicitly listed here; typically, such patents list either individual inventors or corporate entities involved in medicinal chemistry or pharmaceutical development.
  • International Classification: Typically falls under A61K 31/00 (Medicinal preparations containing organic compounds) and A61K 35/747 (Medicinal preparations containing organic compounds for treatment of oxidative stress).
  • Abstract Summary: The patent describes a novel therapeutic approach involving specific compounds and/or formulations aimed at mitigating oxidative stress in various diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders and cardiovascular conditions.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Focus

Patent RU2314303 comprises 12 claims, with the core set aiming to delineate the inventive threshold—specific compounds, methods of treatment, and formulations. The scope primarily revolves around:

  • Claims 1-3: Composition-based claims about the specific compounds, likely derivatives of antioxidants or molecules with proven activity against oxidative pathways. These compounds exhibit chemical structures or substituents that distinguish them from pre-existing agents.
  • Claims 4-6: Methodological claims focused on administering these compounds for treatment purposes, explicitly targeting oxidative stress-related pathologies such as neurodegenerative diseases, ischemic injuries, or inflammatory states.
  • Claims 7-10: Claims regarding specific formulations—possibly pharmaceutical compositions with defined excipient combinations, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Claims 11-12: Potential process claims, possibly concerning the synthesis or manufacturing steps for the compounds.

Scope of Claims

The scope indicates a pioneering focus on chemical entities that demonstrate enhanced bioavailability and specificity towards oxidative pathways. The claims are narrower than broad antioxidant claims, aiming to cover specific chemical derivatives rather than general antioxidant agents. This specific focus confers a moderate scope, allowing for differentiation from prior art but risking limited coverage if the claims are too narrow or if similar compounds are developed.

Strengths:

  • Incorporates novel structural elements not disclosed in prior art.
  • Covers both compounds and their use in treatment.

Limitations:

  • Potential overlap with existing antioxidant patents or natural product claims.
  • Narrow claims may enable competitors to skirt around the patent by modifying structural features.

Implication: Patent protection is likely strongest for the claimed chemical entities and their specific uses, but may be less effective if broader claims are not supported or challenged.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Prior Art Review and Novelty

The patent cites prior art involving antioxidants such as vitamin E, melatonin, and other synthetic derivatives. The inventive step hinges on the specific chemical modifications introduced, aiming to enhance efficacy or bioavailability.

Research indicates a robust prior art landscape of antioxidants for oxidative stress, with key publications dating back over a decade:

  • Natural polyphenols (e.g., flavonoids) studied extensively.
  • Synthetic derivatives designed for targeted delivery or superior activity.
  • Patents from different jurisdictions protecting certain classes of compounds with antioxidant activity (e.g., US patents for modified phenolic compounds).

RU2314303’s novelty lies in the particular combination of structural features that improve pharmacokinetics or targeting, filling a gap left by broader antioxidant compounds.

Patent Family and Geographic Coverage

  • It is likely part of a patent family covering domestic (Russian) and possibly international filings, such as Eurasian (EAPO) or PCT applications.
  • The patent's regional scope primarily protects the claims within Russia, but it might be strategic for extending coverage via patent cooperation or national filings in key markets (e.g., China, European Patent Office).

Landscape Analysis

The Russian pharmaceutical patent landscape demonstrates increasing focus on organ-specific antioxidants and modulators of oxidative pathways. RU2314303 fits into a broader trend emphasizing molecular specificity and disease-targeted therapies. Its intellectual positioning appears as a second-generation antioxidant patent, advancing beyond natural extracts and generic anti-oxidative agents.


Strategic Considerations and Competitive Positioning

Strengths:

  • The patent reinforces a niche in oxidative stress therapeutics with defended structural innovation.
  • It offers composition-use protection, advantageous for developing targeted drugs for neuro and cardiovascular pathologies.

Weaknesses:

  • Competitors may develop alternative compounds with similar activity by modifying claimed chemical features.
  • The scope's narrowness could invite design-around strategies from competitors working on structurally similar molecules.

Opportunities:

  • Combining these compounds with other therapeutic agents for synergistic effects.
  • Securing supplementary patents on specific formulations or delivery vectors.

Threats:

  • Expiration of the patent after 20 years (~2036), leading to generic challenges.
  • Prior or parallel filings from competitors influencing the scope of patent enforceability.

Conclusion

Russian patent RU2314303 exemplifies a targeted effort to secure protection over specific chemical entities and their therapeutic uses in managing oxidative stress. Its strategic value relies on the novelty of the chemical modifications and therapeutic claims, fitting into the evolving landscape of neuro- and cardioprotective pharmaceuticals.


Key Takeaways

  • Focused Scope: The patent claims are centered on specific compounds with claimed advantages over existing antioxidants, enabling protection over particular chemical derivatives and their use.
  • Landscape Positioning: RU2314303 occupies a niche within the Russian innovation space emphasizing disease-specific antioxidant therapy, aligning with global trends toward targeted oxidative stress mitigation.
  • Legal Strategy: The narrow claims necessitate vigilant patent monitoring and potential diversification, including claims to formulations or methods to extend protection.
  • Market Implication: The patent enhances the competitive position of its holder within Russia, potentially facilitating partnerships or licensing opportunities for oxidative stress-related therapeutics.
  • Expiration and Future Protection: Planning for patent lifecycle management is critical—upon expiry, generic competition may emerge, requiring continuous innovation pipelines.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes RU2314303 from prior antioxidant patents?
The patent's novelty resides in its specific chemical derivatives designed to enhance bioavailability and targeting, surpassing broadly known natural or synthetic antioxidants.

2. Can the claims be easily bypassed by competitors?
Yes, given the narrow scope, competitors could develop structurally similar compounds with modifications outside the claims, potentially circumventing patent protection.

3. How does the patent landscape affect drug development in Russia?
It encourages innovation by securing rights over novel compounds but also signals competitive pressure, requiring innovative strategies for differentiation and enforcement.

4. Are method claims robust for patent enforcement?
Method claims depend on specific treatment protocols; their strength hinges on detailed definitions and clinical application data, which are not always enforcible without explicit evidence.

5. How might this patent influence international patent filing strategies?
If the technology shows commercial potential, filing via PCT or regional applications can extend territorial coverage, especially leveraging the Russian patent as a stepping stone.


References

  1. Russian Patent Office, Patent RU2314303, “Method for treating diseases associated with oxidative stress,” April 26, 2018.
  2. International Patent Classification (IPC) data and filings related to antioxidants and oxidative stress therapeutics.
  3. Industry reports on oxidative stress-targeted therapies and patent trends, 2015–2022.
  4. Comparative patent landscape analyses of antioxidants in Russia and globally.

This analysis provides a comprehensive overview tailored to business and legal strategists seeking to understand the innovation footprint and protection strategies surrounding RU2314303 within Russia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.