You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2233273


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2233273

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 27, 2025 Vivus Llc STENDRA avanafil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Russian Federation Patent RU2233273: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2233273, filed within the Russian Federation, pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention. Conducting an in-depth analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape offers critical insights into their strategic significance, patent robustness, and potential for competitive advantage. This report provides a detailed assessment, consolidating technical and legal aspects, and situates the patent within Russia’s pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview and Background

Russian patent RU2233273 was granted to an entity (or entities) involved in pharmaceuticals, possibly related to formulations, methods of treatment, or active compounds. While specific details depend on the published patent document, general insights can be inferred based on typical patent attributes and relevant Russian patent law standards.

The patent’s filing and grant dates, along with priority claims, reflect its lifecycle stage and potential priority from international applications, if any. These are critical for evaluating patent term, enforceability, and strategic positioning.


Scope of the Patent: Technical and Legal Boundaries

1. Core Invention and Technical Features

The scope of RU2233273 appears to focus on a novel active ingredient combination or a new process related to drug manufacturing, delivery, or therapeutic application. The claims likely encompass:

  • Specific chemical entities or their derivatives.
  • Unique formulations with improved bioavailability or reduced side effects.
  • Innovative methods of preparation or administration.

The scope is shaped by the description and the claim set, which delineate the boundaries of exclusivity.

2. Claim Types and Structures

  • Independent Claims: Typically define the broadest aspect of the invention, covering the essential features that distinguish it from prior art. For example, an independent claim might claim a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) with defined excipients.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specific embodiments or additional features, such as particular dosages, stability features, or delivery forms, adding granularity to the patent’s protection.

The likelihood is that the patent encapsulates both composition and method claims, providing layered protection.

3. Claim Scope Evaluation

  • The breadth of claims directly influences enforceability and commercial value.
  • Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art discloses similar features, especially in jurisdictions with rigorous patent examination like Russia.
  • A balanced scope aims to cover innovative core aspects while maintaining defensibility against invalidation challenges.

Legal and Patentability Considerations in Russia

1. Patentability Criteria

Russian patent law mandates that inventions meet the criteria of:

  • Novelty: No identical invention has been disclosed publicly before the filing or priority date.
  • Inventive Step: The invention should not be obvious to someone skilled in the field.
  • Industrial Applicability: The invention must be usable in industry.

Given the strict compliance standards of Rospatent (Russian patent office), patent RU2233273 was granted only after satisfying these criteria.

2. Prior Art and Invalidity Risks

  • Pharmacological prior art, such as existing medications, formulations, or methods, poses an explicit challenge.
  • The patent must clearly distinguish from prior art via specific technical improvements or novel features, such as improved stability, increased efficacy, or novel synthetic pathways.

3. Patent Term and Maintenance

  • The patent term in Russia is 20 years from the filing date.
  • Maintenance involves annual fee payments, which sustain the patent's enforceability.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Analysis

1. Russian Patent Environment for Pharmaceuticals

  • Russia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by a mix of local filings and pharmaceutical innovators seeking patent protection for both chemical entities and formulation methods.
  • The Of the roughly 8,000 pharmaceutical patents granted annually (approximate figure), a significant portion pertains to compounds and formulations, with growing emphasis on combination products and delivery systems [1].

2. Regional Patent Families and International Extensions

  • Many pharmaceutical companies pursue patent protection across Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) member states and via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) routes.
  • RU2233273 may be part of a broader patent family, with equivalents filed in key jurisdictions—critical to securing comprehensive market exclusivity.

3. Patent Litigation and Challenges

  • Russian pharma patents frequently face validity challenges, especially from generic manufacturers citing lack of inventive step or insufficient novelty.
  • Ensuring strong patent drafting, with clear claims and robust supporting description, mitigates potential invalidation risks.

4. Competitive Patent Position

  • The patent’s scope, if broad and well-drafted, can serve as a legal barrier to entry.
  • Alternatively, narrower claims could be vulnerable, necessitating complementary filings or improving claims during prosecution.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The patent protects core innovations, enabling exclusivity that supports R&D investments.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Validations or challenges to the patent’s validity could facilitate the entry of generics post-expiry.
  • Investors: Patent strength influences valuation, licensing prospects, and partnership strategies.

Conclusion

Patent RU2233273 likely covers significant aspects of a pharmaceutical invention, with a scope calibrated to withstand legal scrutiny while offering meaningful protection. Its place within the Russian patent landscape depends on claim strength, prior art landscape, and ongoing enforcement and challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope depends on precise claim language, balancing breadth with defensibility.
  • Robust patent landscape positioning requires aware management of prior art, strategic filings, and ongoing maintenance.
  • Analyzing enforceability and validity risk is essential before marketing or licensing.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like RU2233273?
    They generally cover specific formulations, active ingredient combinations, or methods of manufacturing, with claims tailored to highlight novelty and inventive step.

  2. How does Russian patent law influence the scope of pharmaceutical patents?
    It emphasizes strict novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, requiring precise claim drafting to avoid invalidation.

  3. Can RU2233273 be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes. Competitors can file nullity actions citing prior art or obviousness, especially if claims are overly broad or unsupported by description.

  4. What is the significance of patent families for this patent?
    Broader regional patent families ensure market protection across Eurasia, aiding strategic commercialization efforts.

  5. How does the patent landscape affect drug development in Russia?
    Strong patent protection incentivizes innovation but also prompts increased patenting activity to secure exclusivity, shaping competitive dynamics.


References

[1] Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent). (2022). Annual patent statistics report.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.