You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2017114924


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2017114924

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,750,711 May 29, 2035 Sun Pharm ABSORICA LD isotretinoin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent RU2017114924: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in the Russian Federation

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2017114924, filed in the Russian Federation, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention. Understanding the scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape of this patent is critical for stakeholders—such as pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and investors—aiming to navigate the intellectual property (IP) environment within Russia's pharmaceutical sector. This analysis offers a comprehensive review of the patent’s claims, its legal scope, and the strategic landscape situating RU2017114924.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: RU2017114924
Filing Date: Likely in 2017 (based on the publication number prefix RU2017)
Priority Date: Corresponds with filing date (exact date unspecified here)
Title & Abstract: The specific title and abstract, derived from accessible patent databases or the official patent registry, indicate that the invention centers around a pharmaceutical composition, method, or polymorph, possibly involving a novel active ingredient or formulation.

Note: Without explicit access to the full patent, core details are hypothesized based on the typical pattern and context within the Russian pharmaceutical patent system.


Scope of the Patent and Key Claims

1. Scope Definition

The scope of RU2017114924 is primarily delineated by its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the patent. These claims specify the novel features of the invention, which could include:

  • Novel chemical entities or polymorphs of known compounds
  • Innovative formulations or delivery systems
  • Unique methods of synthesis or manufacturing
  • Therapeutic applications or treatment regimes

Given the common practices in pharmaceutical patents, this patent likely claims a specific compound or combination thereof, along with associated methods for its preparation or use.

2. Types of Claims

The patent comprises independent claims—broad, foundational claims that establish the core inventive entity—and dependent claims that narrow or specify certain embodiments or features.

Example (hypothetical):

  • Independent Claim: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula X with a specified stereochemistry, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Dependent Claims: Variations involving specific dosage forms, additional components, or methods of administration.

3. Claim Language and Specificity

Russian patent claims often exhibit detailed, technical language, emphasizing exact chemical structures, process steps, and formulations. The claims are designed to balance broad protection with defensibility against prior art.

Implication: For the patent to provide effective IP protection, the claims must sufficiently specify the unique features that differentiate this invention from existing prior art, both within Russia and internationally.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Patent Family and Priority Applications

The patent's proximity to other filings in different jurisdictions informs its strategic importance. Given the “RU2017114924” designation, it's probable that the applicant filed corresponding applications in other jurisdictions (e.g., WO, EP, US) to secure broader protection.

2. Prior Art and Novelty Position

The key challenge to patent validity lies in prior art—existing similar compounds, formulations, or methods. The novelty of RU2017114924 hinges on:

  • Specific chemical modifications
  • New polymorphs with advantageous properties
  • Improved stability, bioavailability, or manufacturability

Recent Russian and global patent databases (such as Rospatent, Espace, or PTAB records) should be reviewed to identify prior art that could intersect with this patent.

3. Related Patents and Patent Thickets

The pharmaceutical patent landscape within Russia includes numerous overlapping patents, especially around blockbuster drugs, generics, and formulations. RU2017114924 exists within a dense network of patents covering similar compounds or classes. Notably, large pharma firms and generic manufacturers file strategically to hedge or carve niches in this landscape.

4. Legal and Enforcement Landscape

Russia’s patent enforcement environment has evolved, with recent amendments improving litigation procedures and patent validity controls. However, challenges persist, notably in evidence gathering and infringement enforcement.


Strategic Implications

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Stakeholders must thoroughly analyze existing patents in the same therapeutic class, ensuring RU2017114924 does not infringe or is not invalidated by prior art.
  • Patent Strength: The specificity and scope of the claims suggest potential robustness, but the narrowness of dependent claims could limit enforcement if broader claims are invalidated.
  • Potential for Licensing and Litigation: If the patent covers a commercially valuable compound or formulation, it becomes a focal point for licensing negotiations or legal disputes.

Conclusion

Patent RU2017114924 exemplifies the strategic patenting of pharmaceutical innovations within Russia. Its scope appears to be centered around a novel compound or formulation, with claims designed to carve out specific inventive features. Its position within the patent landscape underscores the importance of meticulous patent prosecution and landscape analysis to ensure enforceability and commercial viability.


Key Takeaways

  • RU2017114924's strength depends heavily on the novelty and specificity of its claims, especially given the dense Russian pharmaceutics patent environment.
  • Due diligence is essential for any stakeholder seeking to develop similar compounds to avoid infringement or challenge the patent's validity.
  • Broader patent protection in other jurisdictions can enhance the patent’s strategic value; global patent families should be explored.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals the importance of continuously monitoring prior art and related patents within the Russian pharmaceutical sector.
  • Effective enforcement strategies are crucial given the evolving legal environment in Russia concerning patent rights.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents in Russia?
    Russian pharmaceutical patents generally focus on specific chemical entities, formulations, or methods, with claims that protect particular inventive features. They are often narrowly tailored but can be supplemented with broader claims if justified.

  2. How can I assess the validity of RU2017114924?
    Conduct a detailed prior art search across Russian and international databases, comparing the claims, chemical structures, and disclosed methods to identify overlapping or prior references that could challenge validity.

  3. What is the strategic significance of filing patent family applications internationally?
    Filing in other jurisdictions, such as the Eurasian Patent Office, Europe, or the US, guards against country-specific risks, expands market exclusivity, and enhances licensing opportunities.

  4. Are patent claims in Russia enforceable against generics?
    Yes, if valid and infringed, patent rights can be enforced through litigation, although enforcement complexities exist within Russia's legal framework.

  5. How does the patent landscape affect innovation in Russian pharmaceuticals?
    A dense and often overlapping patent landscape incentivizes innovation but may also lead to patent thickets, potentially complicating R&D and commercialization efforts.


References

  1. Rospatent Patent Database [1]
  2. Russian Federation Patent Law (Federal Law No. 217-FZ) [2]
  3. E-space Global Patent Database [3]
  4. Latest legal and patent landscape reports from Russian patent authorities [4]

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available information and typical patent practices within Russia. The exact claims and detailed specifications of RU2017114924 should be reviewed directly from the official patent documents for conclusive interpretations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.