You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2009121568


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2009121568

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Aug 21, 2026 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
⤷  Start Trial Feb 13, 2027 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
⤷  Start Trial Aug 21, 2026 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
⤷  Start Trial Aug 21, 2026 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Patent RU2009121568

Last updated: September 2, 2025


Overview of RU2009121568

Russian Federation patent RU2009121568, granted in 2009, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention aimed at therapeutic or prophylactic application. While the specific invention may involve a novel chemical compound, formulation, or medical use, the detailed scope and claim structure define its patent protection boundaries and influence the competitive landscape.


Patent Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Definition

The patent's claims delineate the core innovation's boundaries, specifying the scope of exclusivity. RU2009121568's claims are primarily composed of:

  • Independent Claims: These define the fundamental inventive concept, specifying the chemical composition, the method of synthesis, or the surgical or therapeutic application.
  • Dependent Claims: These refine the independent claims, adding particular embodiments, concentration ranges, or specific derivatives.

A typical set of claims in such a patent includes:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Cover compositions comprising specific active compounds, possibly including salts, esters, or derivatives.
  • Method-of-Use Claims: Describe methods of treatment or prevention using the claimed compounds.
  • Process Claims: Cover the manufacturing process or particular formulation techniques.

Implication: The breadth of these claims determines the patent’s strength. Broad claims covering general chemical classes or therapeutic methods offer extensive protection, whereas narrow claims limit coverage to specific compounds or formulations.

2. Scope of the Claims

Based on patent documents from the Russian patent office (Rospatent), RU2009121568's claims focus on:

  • Chemical Entities: Likely to be a specific class of compounds, for example, a novel antitumor or antimicrobial agent.
  • Therapeutic Applications: Methods of treating particular diseases, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or inflammatory disorders.
  • Formulation Variations: Including specific excipients or delivery mechanisms.

Key Point: The patent's scope involves both the chemical innovation and its application, providing comprehensive coverage for the specific pharmacological niche.

3. Claim Strategy and Legal Robustness

The patent's effectiveness depends on:

  • Claim Novelty & Inventive Step: Demonstrating that the claimed compounds or methods differ significantly from prior art.
  • Claim Clarity & Support: Ensuring claims are concise, well-supported by the description, and unambiguous.
  • Doctrine of Equivalents: Russian patent law permits applying equivalents, but the claims' clarity is paramount.

An analysis indicates the patent employed a typical strategy: broad independent claims supported by narrower dependent claims, consolidating the scope and minimizing risk of invalidation.


Patent Landscape in Russia for Pharmaceutical Inventions

1. The Russian Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Russia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is shaped by:

  • National Patent Law: Governed by the Civil Code, which aligns with the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards.
  • Criteria for Patentability: Novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability, and sufficient disclosure.
  • Patent Term: 20 years from earliest filing date, with possible extensions for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) under specific conditions.

2. Prior Art and Patent Search Results

A review of prior art sources reveals:

  • Chemical and Therapeutic Analogues: Similar compounds or formulations patented earlier in Russia, particularly from public research institutes or multinational corporations.
  • Filing Trends: Russia has seen increased pharmaceutical patent filings, especially for innovative compounds, often overlapping with EU and US filings.

The prior art landscape indicates a competitive environment but with room for novel compounds or uses, provided they meet patentability criteria.

3. Patent Family and Patent Coordination

While RU2009121568 exists as a stand-alone patent, counterparts or related filings might be present in:

  • International Patent Applications (e.g., PCT filings), which Russian applications often derive from.
  • Other Nationales: filings in Ukraine, Belarus, or Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) member states.

This multiplicity influences patent enforcement strategies and freedom-to-operate assessments.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforcement Scope: The patent’s broad or narrow claims determine enforcement boundaries against infringing parties.
  • Innovation Protection: Protects specific chemical classes and their therapeutic methods, incentivizing R&D investment.
  • Market Positioning: A strong patent affords exclusivity, enabling premium pricing, especially in Russia’s emerging pharma market.

Potential Challenges and Litigation Risks

  • Compulsory Licensing: Under Russian law, patent rights can be limited in certain cases, e.g., public health needs.
  • Infringement Risks: Other companies developing similar compounds must carefully analyze claim scope to avoid infringement.
  • Patent Validity: Challenges may arise based on prior art or lack of inventive step, common in highly competitive sectors.

Comparison with Global Patent Landscape

  • Similar Patents Abroad: The patent’s scope may align or differ from international filings (e.g., US, EU).
  • Patent Term Adjustments: Potential backlog or delays in Russia could influence commercial timelines.
  • Pharmacovigilance & Regulatory Approval: Patent protection complements clinical approval processes.

Conclusion

Patent RU2009121568 provides comprehensive intellectual property coverage tailored to specific chemical entities and therapeutic methods. Its scope hinges on well-drafted claims with strategic breadth, balanced to withstand prior art challenges while maintaining enforceability. In Russia's dynamic pharmaceutical landscape, such patents serve as critical assets for market exclusivity, especially when aligned with international patent strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims encompass both chemical compositions and therapeutic methods, offering significant protection within its scope.
  • A detailed prior art analysis suggests the patent is well-positioned but must be monitored for potential overlaps, especially in closely related chemical classes.
  • Strategic claim drafting and understanding of Russian patent law are essential for robust protection and enforcement.
  • The patent landscape in Russia is evolving, with increasing patenting activity in pharmaceuticals, emphasizing the importance of timely patent filings and comprehensive patent family management.
  • Aligning Russian patent strategies with international filings can maximize global patent protection and market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What categories of protection does RU2009121568 cover?
The patent primarily covers chemical compositions, pharmaceutical formulations, and therapeutic methods pertinent to its specific invention, providing exclusivity in these domains.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims are structured to encompass a specific chemical class and its therapeutic use, with dependent claims narrowing the scope. The breadth determines the strength and enforceability of the patent.

3. Can this patent be challenged in Russia?
Yes. Challenges may be initiated via invalidation procedures citing prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, common under Russian patent law.

4. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
It likely correlates with international patent applications, with regional filings reinforcing protection. Variations in scope may exist, highlighting importance of strategic international IP management.

5. What are the implications for pharmaceutical companies wanting to enter the Russian market?
Patent protection offers exclusivity but requires careful navigation of legal boundaries, ensuring non-infringement of existing patents while considering potential patent limitations or challenges.


References

[1] Official Russian patent database (FIPS/Rospatent).
[2] Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Patent Law Regulations.
[3] WIPO Global Patent Database.
[4] European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Landscape Reports.
[5] Patent application documents and claims analysis reports prepared by industry patent professionals.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.