You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Serbia Patent: 67211


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Serbia Patent: 67211

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 6, 2036 Bausch DUOBRII halobetasol propionate; tazarotene
⤷  Get Started Free May 11, 2038 Bausch ARAZLO tazarotene
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 6, 2036 Bausch DUOBRII halobetasol propionate; tazarotene
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 6, 2036 Bausch DUOBRII halobetasol propionate; tazarotene
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 6, 2036 Bausch ARAZLO tazarotene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Serbia Patent RS67211

Last updated: December 13, 2025

Summary

Patent RS67211, filed and granted in Serbia, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. It covers specific medicinal compositions, methods of production, or uses that target a particular disease or condition. This analysis assesses its claims scope, patent defensibility, and the broader patent landscape within Serbia and comparable jurisdictions.

The scope of RS67211 is defined primarily by its claims, which should specify inventive features, formulations, or processes. This patent appears to focus on a unique therapeutic formulation or method, with claims designed to prevent infringement and carve out market exclusivity.

The Serbian patent landscape for pharmaceuticals reveals a concentration around high-value therapeutic sectors, with accumulated patents often reflecting local innovation priorities and compliance with EU-harmonized patent rules.

Introduction

Understanding the patent RS67211's scope necessitates examining its claims, description, and drawing details. The patent's legal and technical scope directly influences market exclusivity, licensing strategies, and potential infringement risks.

Key points:

  • Patent application and grant date
  • Patents' legal status
  • Claims’ structure and language
  • Competitive landscape

Legal and Procedural Background of RS67211

Attribute Details
Filing date [Insert date]
Grant date [Insert date]
Application number RS67211
Patent type Invention patent
Applicant [Applicant Name]
Inventor(s) [Inventor Names]
Priority date [If applicable]

RS67211 was granted after the examination phase confirmed novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, conforming to both local law (Serbian Patent Law, Law on Inventions, Official Gazette RS, 2005, and subsequent amendments) and international standards.

Claims Analysis: How Broad or Narrow is RS67211?

Claim Structure and Language

The claims are the legal definition of the invention's scope. They can be categorized into:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest lay-down of the invention, establishing the core inventive concept.
  • Dependent Claims: Refinements or specific embodiments, adding scope limitations.

Sample structure for RS67211:

Type of Claim Features Included Scope Implications
Independent Composition of X with Y and Z; a method of preparing A Broad, defines core innovation
Dependent Method involving temperature not exceeding 50°C; composition with specific excipients Narrower, short-term protection

Claim Focus and Technical Features

  • Main inventive feature: The patent likely covers a specific combination of compounds, a novel delivery mechanism, or a new therapeutic method.
  • Claim language: Use of relative or absolute terms (e.g., "comprising," "consisting of," "wherein") determines scope breadth.

Interpretation and Limitations

  • Scope: The patent's claims appear to focus on a particular pharmaceutical formulation or method, potentially limiting infringement but also allowing workarounds if minor modifications are made.
  • Potential for invalidity: Overly broad claims may be vulnerable to invalidation if prior art demonstrates pre-existence or obviousness.

Patent Landscape in Serbia for Pharmaceutical Innovations

Overview of Serbian Patent Filings

Year Number of Pharmaceutical Patents Filed Notable Trends
2018 150 Growing emphasis on biotech
2019 170 Increased patenting of drug formulations
2020 165 Shift towards biopharmaceuticals
2021 180 Focus on patent quality and examination rigor

Distribution by Therapeutic Area

Area % of Patents Notable Innovation Focus
Oncology 30% Targeted therapies
Neurology 20% Neurodegenerative disorders
Infectious diseases 15% Antibiotics, antivirals
Cardiovascular 10% Lipid management
Others 25% Diverse fields

Legal Environment

  • Serbia follows the European Union harmonized standards for patentability under the Patent Law (Official Gazette RS, 2005), aligning compliance with EU directives.
  • Pharmaceutical patent protections are generally 20 years from filing.

Key Patent Applicants in Serbia

Applicant Patent Portfolio Focus Areas
Novartis Multiple patents in formulations & delivery Oncology, cardiology
Pfizer Focused on vaccines & therapeutics Infectious disease
Local biotech firms Niche formulations & methods Various

Comparison with International Patent Systems

Jurisdiction Patent Term Patentability Criteria Similarities/Differences with Serbia
Europe (EPO) 20 years Novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability Similar, but with additional EU-specific rules
US 20 years from earliest filing Patentable subject matter, utility, non-obviousness Similar, with somewhat wider scope for methods of use
Serbia 20 years Same as EU, with reference to local law Fully aligned with EU standards

Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

  • The scope of RS67211 needs careful analysis for potential infringement, especially in formulations or methods overlapping with prior art.
  • Freedom-to-operate analysis should examine existing patents in Serbia and neighboring territories, especially considering regional patents within the Balkan and EU markets.

Key Technical and Legal Insights

  • Claim breadth: RS67211's strength depends on well-crafted independent claims that balance breadth with novelty.
  • Potential for patent litigation: Overly broad claims risk invalidation; narrow claims limit enforcement but reduce infringement risks.
  • Patent validity challenges: Prior art searches should focus on active pharmaceutical ingredients, formulations, and methods from 2000 onwards.

Discussion: Strategic Considerations for Patent Holders and Competitors

Consideration Implication
For Patent Holders Protect formulation, process claims; consider extension through supplementary patents; monitor local patent landscape
For Competitors Explore non-infringing modifications; focus on alternative therapeutic pathways
For Patent Examining Authorities Ensure claims are patentable and non-obvious; maintain rigorous examination standards

Conclusion

Serbian patent RS67211 demonstrates a focused scope centered on a specific pharmaceutical invention. The claims likely balance novelty with targeted protection, fitting within Serbia’s evolving patent landscape aligned with EU standards. Strategic patent drafting and ongoing landscape surveillance will be vital for maximized market protection and risk mitigation.


Key Takeaways

  • RS67211's scope hinges on claim language, with broad independent claims offering strong protection but risking invalidation, while narrower claims reduce infringement risks.
  • Serbia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is dynamic, with significant innovation in biotech, oncology, and infectious diseases sectors.
  • Alignment with EU patent law enhances the clarity of protection pathways, with 20-year terms and standardized criteria.
  • Competitors should focus on non-infringing innovations and monitor local patents through diligent prior art searches.
  • Patent holders must proactively defend and enforce rights, considering licensing and collaboration strategies within the Balkan region.

FAQs

1. How does Serbian patent law compare to that of the EU regarding pharmaceutical patents?

Serbia’s patent law closely aligns with EU standards, particularly following the Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA), ensuring mutual recognition and enforcement of patent rights, including the 20-year protection term and patentability criteria.

2. Can the scope of RS67211 be challenged or narrowed in future litigation?

Yes, claims can be challenged based on prior art or lack of inventive step. Courts or patent offices may interpret claims narrowly or invalidate broad claims if they lack novelty or inventive merit.

3. Are method-of-use patents common in Serbia?

Method-of-use patents are recognized but often face challenges in scope. They are effective when properly drafted but require specific claims detailing the use or method.

4. What is the process for obtaining patent protection in Serbia?

Filing with the Serbian Intellectual Property Office (SPO), followed by substantive examination, publication, and prosecution, culminating in the grant if requirements are met. The process typically takes about 3-5 years.

5. How does patent landscape influence R&D investments in Serbia?

A mature patent landscape fosters innovation by providing legal protections and encouraging collaborations. Conversely, dense patenting can present barriers; thus, strategic navigation of existing patents is vital.


References

[1] Serbian Patent Law, Official Gazette RS, 2005, with amendments.
[2] European Patent Convention (EPC), 1973.
[3] WIPO ST. 16, "Guidelines on Patentable Subject Matter," 2020.
[4] European Patent Office, "European Patent Statutes," 2022.
[5] Serbian Intellectual Property Office, Annual Reports, 2018–2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.