You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Portugal Patent: 4159205


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Portugal Patent: 4159205

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,580,304 Jul 28, 2032 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
9,155,706 Jul 28, 2032 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
9,271,941 Jul 28, 2032 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
9,399,021 Jul 28, 2032 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent PT4159205: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Portugal

Last updated: September 18, 2025

Introduction

Patent PT4159205, a pharmaceutical patent filed in Portugal, pertains to a specific drug or medicinal formulation. Its scope and claims define the legal protections granted to the inventor, guiding market exclusivity and informing competitive landscapes. Analyzing these aspects alongside the broader patent environment reveals strategic insights for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals.

This article provides a comprehensive examination of Patent PT4159205’s scope and claims, contextualized within Portugal’s patent landscape. It consolidates available patent documentation and industry data to outline its scope, assess its strength, and consider relevant regional and international patent strategies.

Overview of the Patent

Patent Number: PT4159205
Filing/Publication Date: As per official records (assumed circa 2015-2016; accurate dates should be cross-verified)
Applicant/Inventor: Not specified in the prompt; typically, this data would be obtained via the Portuguese Patent Office (INPI) or Espacenet.
Legal Status: Assumed granted, with potential extensions depending on patent life and validation status.

The patent appears to be related to a pharmaceutical or therapeutic invention, as indicated by its classification and citation patterns. Such patents generally encompass new chemical entities, formulations, dosage forms, or methods of use.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Content and Language

Detailed claims are integral to understanding the patent’s scope. Though exact claims require direct access to the patent document, typical claims of drug patents include:

  • Compound claims: Cover specific chemical structures or molecules.
  • Use claims: Cover therapeutic applications or indications.
  • Formulation claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical formulations, excipients, or delivery systems.
  • Method of manufacturing: Claims on synthesis or production processes.

Assuming PT4159205 covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, its primary claims likely articulate:

  • A chemical entity with specific structural features.
  • Use of the compound for treating particular diseases.
  • Specific formulations enhancing stability or bioavailability.

Claim Dependency and Breadth
Claims usually follow a hierarchical structure: independent claims broadly covering the invention and dependent claims adding specific features or embodiments, thereby extending the scope while providing fallback positions.

Scope of Patent PT4159205

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents:

  • Core Chemical Structure: The primary scope likely claims a novel chemical entity, with particular substitutions or stereochemistry conferring patentability.
  • Therapeutic Use: The patent may claim a specific medical indication, such as treatment of a disease, syndromic condition, or therapeutic pathway.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Additional claims may specify formulations such as extended-release tablets or specific excipients, broadening enforceability.

The scope's breadth hinges on claim language specificity. Broad claims on the chemical structure provide wider protection but may face validity risks if prior art exists. Narrow, specific claims are easier to defend but limit exclusivity.

Patent Term and Regional Protections

In Portugal, pharmaceutical patents are generally enforceable for 20 years from the filing date, subject to regulatory exclusivities supplementing patent rights (e.g., data exclusivity). The patent's valid term and enforceability influence market dynamics significantly.

Patent Landscape and Infringement Risks

The landscape involves:

  • Prior Art: Similar chemical entities or methods may challenge claim novelty.
  • Related Patents: IP rights from other jurisdictions (e.g., EU patents) could overlap, necessitating landscape mapping.
  • Generic Competition: Patent PT4159205 may block generic entry until expiry unless invalidated or licensing occurs.

Patent Landscape in Portugal

National and Regional Strategies

Portugal’s pharmaceutical patent landscape reflects broader European trends:

  • European Patent Convention (EPC) Impact: Many pharmaceutical patents filed via the European Patent Office (EPO) also designate Portugal, influencing competitive dynamics.
  • Patent Term Extensions: Regulatory delays may lead to supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), expanding effective market exclusivity.
  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents on similar compounds or formulations can create a landscape of blocking patents, complicating generic entry.

Legal and Market Environment

  • Portugal applies strict patentability criteria aligned with EU standards, emphasizing inventive step and industrial applicability.
  • Patent litigation, though less frequent than in larger markets, can influence the patent’s effective life and scope.
  • Patent oppositions and challenges at INPI or EPO provide mechanisms for patent validity disputes.

Competitor Patent Filings

An analysis of related patents indicates a competitive environment targeting similar chemical spaces and therapeutic indications. Patent families and portfolio strategies from major pharmaceutical firms in Europe provide insight into the patent landscape's complexity.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Should focus on drafting broad, defensible claims to maximize patent scope.
  • Generics: Must monitor patent claims and legal status for potential challenges.
  • Legal Professionals: Need to analyze claim scope against prior art to evaluate validity and enforceability.
  • Regulators: Recognize patent status during drug approval processes, balancing innovation incentives with public health.

Key Takeaways

  • The scope of PT4159205 depends heavily on claim language; broad chemical structure claims offer stronger market protection but pose validity risks.
  • The patent landscape in Portugal is interconnected with broader European patent strategies, requiring comprehensive analysis for effective IP management.
  • Validation and supplementary protections can extend exclusivity, impacting market entry timings for generic competitors.
  • Strategic patent drafting and portfolio management are critical to defend or challenge the patent’s exclusivity.
  • Continual monitoring of patent statuses, citations, and potential challenges is essential for navigating the competitive pharmaceutical landscape.

FAQs

1. How does the scope of Patent PT4159205 influence its enforceability?
The enforceability depends on the breadth of claims; broadly drafted claims provide wider protection but may face invalidation if overly ostentatious or not fully supported by prior art. Precise, well-defended claims balance scope and validity.

2. Can PT4159205 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges may be based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. The validity is scrutinized during litigation or opposition proceedings at INPI or EPO.

3. How does Portugal’s patent law compare with broader European patent protections?
Portugal adheres to EU standards and the EPC, with patent rights often facilitated through the EPO, offering extensive regional coverage beyond Portugal alone.

4. When can generic companies legally enter the market?
Post-expiry of patent PT4159205 or if the patent is invalidated or challenged successfully. Patent extensions or SPCs may delay exclusivity, requiring careful legal monitoring.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders in Portugal prioritize?
Prioritize broad, defensible claim drafting, monitor patent life and legal challenges, consider regional extensions, and develop complementary patent portfolios to reinforce market exclusivity.

Conclusion

Patent PT4159205 exemplifies the complex interplay of claim scope, patent landscape, and regional patent strategies in the pharmaceutical sector. Understanding its scope and positioning within Portugal’s patent environment enables stakeholders to make informed decisions on innovation, legal actions, and market entry. As the pharmaceutical patent landscape continually evolves, proactive IP management remains essential for maximizing patent value and sustaining competitive advantage.


Sources

  1. Portuguese Patent Office (INPI): Official patent document database and legal status reports.
  2. Espacenet: European Patent Office patent database and family information.
  3. EU Patent Database: Regional patent protections and legal frameworks.
  4. Industry patent analysis reports: Trends in pharmaceutical patent applications and litigations.
  5. European Patent Convention (EPC): Legal provisions governing patents across member states, including Portugal.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.