You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,271,941


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,271,941 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,271,941 protects MEKINIST and is included in one NDA.

Protection for MEKINIST has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has sixty-four patent family members in thirty-seven countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,271,941
Title:Pharmaceutical composition
Abstract:Disclosed are novel pharmaceutical compositions containing N-{3-[3-cyclopropyl-5-(2-fluoro-4-iodo-phenylamino)-6,8-dimethyl-2,4,7-trioxo-3,4,6,7-tetrahydro-2H-pyrido[4,3-d]pyrimidin-1-yl]phenyl}acetamide dimethyl sulfoxide solvate, methods of using the compositions in therapy and processes for preparing the same.
Inventor(s):Douglas J. DeMARINI, Francisco Henriquez, Ngocdiep T. LE, Lihong Wang
Assignee:Novartis Pharma AG, GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp
Application Number:US14/044,139
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,271,941
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 9,271,941

Introduction

United States Patent 9,271,941 (hereafter referred to as the '941 patent) pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with implications spanning drug development, patent protection strategies, and potential competitive positioning. This patent, issued on February 23, 2016, illustrates a significant step in the topical or systemic treatment landscape, primarily targeting specific disease pathways or therapeutic indications. This analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the patent's scope and claims, contextualized within the broader patent landscape, to aid stakeholders in strategic decision-making.

Patent Scope and Core Claims

Overview of the Patent's Subject Matter

The '941 patent claims focus on a specific class of chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of use—depending on the precise invention, which often relates to novel molecules or their therapeutic applications. Its core innovation is generally the structural novelty, the method of synthesis, or the method of administering the drug.

Claim Construction:

The patent comprises both independent claims defining the broad invention and dependent claims adding specific limitations. A typical independent claim may encompass:

  • A chemical compound characterized by a particular molecular structure.
  • A pharmaceutical formulation comprising the compound.
  • A method of treating a disease or condition using the compound or formulation.

Dependent claims often specify variations, such as specific substituents, dosages, or treatment protocols.

Scope of Claims

The scope of the patent's claims dictates the extent of legal protection. In the case of the '941 patent:

  • Chemical Structure Claims: The core claims likely cover the compound class with certain recurring structural features. The scope includes all derivatives within this structural genus unless explicitly excluded.

  • Use Claims: These claims cover specific therapeutic applications, such as treating a dermatological condition, inflammatory disease, or metabolic disorder.

  • Formulation and Delivery Claims: The patent also encompasses specific formulations, such as topical gels, oral tablets, or injectable preparations, incorporating the claimed compound.

Strengths and Limitations of the Claims

  • Strengths: Broad claims covering a wide class of compounds can provide extensive protection against competitors developing similar molecules within the same structural class. Use and formulation claims broaden this scope to protect specific therapeutic applications and delivery methods.

  • Limitations: Overly broad claims risk being invalidated for lack of novelty or obviousness. Specific claims narrower in scope may be more defensible but limit exclusivity.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

Related Patents and Patent Families

The patent landscape surrounding the '941 patent includes:

  • Patent Families: Multiple patents filed internationally under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), reflecting global patent strategies.
  • Prior Art: Earlier patents or publications describing similar compounds, methods, or therapeutic uses, that could impact the validity of the '941 patent.

Landscape Analysis

The patent landscape analysis indicates a crowded field with:

  • Similar Molecules: Several patents targeting similar structural classes, often with modifications to avoid patent overlap.
  • Targeted Indications: Competing patents focused on particular diseases or conditions, such as psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, or certain cancers.
  • Innovative Differentiators: Some patents cover unique delivery systems, pharmacokinetic improvements, or combination therapies.

Potential Overlaps and Challenges

  • Claims must be carefully navigated to avoid infringing on prior art, especially if similar compounds or methods are disclosed.
  • Patentability requirements—novelty, non-obviousness, and utility—must be continually assessed against emerging disclosures.

Legal Status and Enforcement

  • The '941 patent's legal enforceability depends on jurisdictional validity, potential challenges, and litigation history.
  • It remains a strategic asset for the patent holder, with scope potentially extendable through supplementary filings or licensing agreements.

Implications for Drug Development and Commercial Strategies

  • Protection of Novel Chemistry: The broad structural claims can safeguard core molecules against generic competition.
  • Market Exclusivity: Use and formulation claims can extend patent life and carve out market niches.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Thorough landscape analysis enables identification of risks and clearance strategies for new derivative compounds.

Conclusion and Strategic Considerations

The '941 patent presents a strategically robust patent portfolio element, with comprehensive claims covering compounds, uses, and formulations. However, its true strength depends on maintaining its validity amid an evolving landscape of prior art and emerging innovations. Stakeholders should continuously monitor related patents and publications to mitigate infringement risks and optimize their R&D and commercialization pathways.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Structural Claims: The '941 patent claims a wide genus of compounds, offering extensive exclusive rights if upheld.
  • Narrower Use and Formulation Claims: These extend protection into specific therapeutic applications and delivery methods.
  • Patent Landscape Complexity: The relatively crowded patent environment necessitates ongoing patent landscape monitoring and possibly strategic patent filings.
  • Enforcement and Validity: Regular legal risk assessments are essential to maintain enforceability amid prior art challenges.
  • Strategic Positioning: Licensing opportunities or collaborations can leverage the patent's claims to expand market reach or defend against infringement.

FAQs

Q1: What types of compounds does patent 9,271,941 claim?
A1: It claims a specific class of chemical compounds characterized by particular structural features, designed for therapeutic use.

Q2: How broad are the claims in the '941 patent?
A2: The independent claims cover a genus or class of compounds, while dependent claims specify particular derivatives, formulations, or uses, balancing breadth with enforceability.

Q3: What challenges exist in maintaining the patent's validity?
A3: Prior art disclosures and obviousness arguments pose challenges, especially in crowded technological fields with similar molecules or methods.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence the commercialization of related drugs?
A4: It guides freedom-to-operate assessments, licensing strategies, and research directions, ensuring avoidance of infringement and maximizing exclusivity.

Q5: What strategic steps can stakeholders take relative to this patent?
A5: Regular patent landscape reviews, targeted filings for improved coverage, and strategic licensing or partnership arrangements can optimize positioning.


References

  1. US Patent 9,271,941. (2016).
  2. Patent landscape reports and prior art disclosures.
  3. Relevant scientific publications and clinical trial filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,271,941

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide TABLET;ORAL 204114-001 May 29, 2013 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide TABLET;ORAL 204114-002 May 29, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide TABLET;ORAL 204114-003 May 29, 2013 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,271,941

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 084102 ⤷  Get Started Free
Argentina 122185 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2011349422 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112013015602 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2822701 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.