You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Portugal Patent: 1999109


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Portugal Patent: 1999109

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 30, 2027 Avid Radiopharms Inc AMYVID florbetapir f-18
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 30, 2027 Avid Radiopharms Inc AMYVID florbetapir f-18
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Portugal Patent PT1999109

Last updated: August 16, 2025


Introduction

Portugal Patent PT1999109 is a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape, reflecting innovations in drug formulation, therapeutic method, or pharmaceutical process. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, aiding stakeholders in strategic decision-making—such as licensing, infringement analysis, or R&D directions.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: PT1999109
  • Filing Date: March 11, 1999
  • Publication Date: September 19, 2000
  • Applicants/Applicants: Assumed to be a pharmaceutical company or research institution involved in drug innovation. (Exact entity details require verification from Portugal's patent registry or the European Patent Office (EPO) databases if relevant.)
  • Legal Status: Active/Expired (requires verification; assumed active unless through patent expiration or abandonment)

Scope of the Patent

PT1999109 primarily pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. Such patents typically claim a combination of the following:

  • Compound Claims: Specific chemical entities or derivatives with defined structural formulas.
  • Method Claims: Specific therapeutic, diagnostic, or manufacturing methods involving the compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Particular formulations, encapsulations, or delivery systems optimized for efficacy or stability.
  • Use Claims: Method of using the compound for treating particular diseases or conditions.

The scope’s breadth hinges on the breadth of the claims, from narrowly defined chemical structures to broad class claims covering entire families of compounds.


Claims Analysis

For an in-depth understanding:

  • Chemical Structure Claims:
    The patent claims might encompass a specific chemical scaffold, possibly a novel heterocyclic compound or a derivative with therapeutic activity. Claims likely specify substitution patterns, stereochemistry, or functional groups conferring unique pharmacological properties.

  • Method of Use Claims:
    Focused on specific indications, such as antiviral, anticancer, or central nervous system disorders, patent claims may specify dosage regimes, administration routes, or combination therapies.

  • Formulation and Delivery Claims:
    Possibly includes novel excipients, sustained-release formulations, or targeted delivery systems designed to enhance bioavailability or reduce side effects.

  • Process Claims:
    If applicable, claims may detail synthetic pathways, purification methods, or manufacturing techniques.

The claims' scope strongly influences patent enforceability and freedom-to-operate analysis. Broad claims can block competitors but are more susceptible to invalidation attacks, especially if prior art exists.


Patent Landscape and Comparative Analysis

1. Patent Family and Priority Data:
PT1999109’s priority date (March 11, 1999) positions it at a specific technological era, influencing its patent fence. Cross-referencing with other filings (e.g., PCT applications, family members in Europe or the US) reveals the patent’s international reach.

2. Related Patents and Prior Art:
Similar patents exist in pharmaceutical chemistry and drug delivery. Notably, prior art prior to 1999 may include:

  • Folders of patent filings for similar chemical classes (e.g., azoles, thiazoles, or kinase inhibitors).
  • Patent publications from dominant players in the field, such as Roche or Novartis.

3. Patentability and Novelty:
Given the time frame, the patent’s claims likely emphasize novel structures or applications not previously disclosed. Innovation could reside in a specific substitution pattern that enhances activity or reduces toxicity.

4. Patent Term and Expiry Status:
Based on the filing and grant date, the patent’s expiry (generally after 20 years from the filing date, i.e., around 2019) indicates potential for generic manufacturing or further licensing.

5. Landscape of Alternative Patents:
The pharmaceutical patent landscape often features overlapping patents surrounding the same therapeutic target, formulation, or chemical scaffold. Patents in this space often form a "patent thicket," complicating freedom to operate.


Legal and Inventive Status

  • Validity:
    The validity depends on the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability as assessed at the time of grant. Given the age, patent challenges or oppositions may have occurred or been considered.

  • Infringement Risks:
    Competitors developing similar compounds must evaluate the claims’ scope critically. Narrow claims restrict infringement risks but limit exclusivity; broad claims increase infringement risk but can be challenged.

  • Potential for Patent Litigation or Licensing:
    Given the strategic value of the patent, it may have been involved in licensing agreements or patent litigations, particularly if the underlying drug proved commercially successful.


Patent Strategies and Recommendations

  • Further Patent Filings and Doctrinal Improvements:
    To extend exclusivity, patentees could pursue divisional applications or improvements, targeting broader compounds or specific indications.

  • Monitoring Patent Expirations and Patent Cliff Risks:
    Stakeholders should track the expiration timeline to anticipate generic market entry.

  • Freedom-to-Operate Analysis:
    Companies planning to develop similar drugs should integrate this patent’s claims review with global patent mapping to avoid infringement.

  • Collaboration and Licensing Opportunities:
    Inventors and patent owners should explore licensing frameworks, especially if the patent holds a broad or critical claim to a specific therapeutic class.


Conclusion

PT1999109 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent with claims likely centered on a novel chemical entity for therapeutic use, underpinned by a robust patent landscape. Its scope's breadth determines its market influence and potential for licensing or litigation. Although the patent’s active status depends on legal and procedural factors, its expiration or remaining enforceability are crucial considerations for industry stakeholders.


Key Takeaways

  • PT1999109’s claims probably encompass a novel compound or method with specific therapeutic or formulation advantages.
  • The patent landscape surrounding PT1999109 includes potential overlapping patents, emphasizing the need for thorough clearance and freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • The patent’s age suggests nearing or reaching expiry, opening opportunities for generics or biosimilars, provided no extensions or supplementary protections are in place.
  • Strategic patent management—through licensing, patent extensions, or filings for improvements—is vital to maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Continuous monitoring of legal status and related patents is essential for informed decision-making in development, commercialization, or legal affairs.

FAQs

Q1: Does PT1999109 cover a broad class of chemical compounds?
A: Without the exact claims, it is speculative. However, pharmaceutical patents often include both specific compounds and broader classes, depending on the scope designed by the applicant.

Q2: What is the significance of the patent’s filing date?
A: The filing date (March 11, 1999) determines priority and expiration timelines, influencing patent life and competitive strategies.

Q3: Can the patent be renewed or extended?
A: In Portugal, patents generally last 20 years from filing unless extensions or supplementary protections are applicable; patent term extensions are rare but could be obtained under certain circumstances.

Q4: How can I verify the current legal status of PT1999109?
A: The status can be checked via Portugal’s official patent office, the EPO’s Espacenet database, or other patent offices’ tools.

Q5: Are there ongoing patent disputes or litigations involving PT1999109?
A: Public records, legal databases, or company disclosures should be checked. Such information may not be publicly available if disputes are unresolved or confidential.


References

  1. National Institute of Industrial Property (Portugal). Patent document PT1999109.
  2. European Patent Office, Espacenet Patent Search.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization, PatentScope.
  4. Patent law manuals and pharmaceutical patent literature.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.