You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 398653


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 398653

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,365,205 Apr 18, 2027 Daiichi Sankyo Inc SAVAYSA edoxaban tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Patent PL398653

Last updated: August 25, 2025

Introduction

Patent PL398653 is a Polish patent that appears to address innovations within the pharmaceutical field, likely related to drug formulations, compositions, or methods of use. Given the competitive nature of pharmaceutical intellectual property (IP), understanding the scope and claims of this patent provides critical insight for stakeholders including patent holders, competitors, and legal professionals involved in licensing, patent infringement, or patent landscape analyses.

This report delivers a comprehensive review of the scope and claims of PL398653, its positioning within the broader patent landscape, and strategic considerations for stakeholders.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: PL398653
Filing Date: [Insert filing/tracking date; typically obtained from official patent database]
Grant Date: [Insert grant date]
Applicants/Owners: [Insert assignee/applicant, e.g., pharmaceutical companies, research institutions]
Publication/Grant Authority: Patent Office of Poland, EPO, or other relevant authorities


Scope of Patent PL398653

Legal and Technical Scope

Patent PL398653 primarily covers a specific innovation within the pharmaceutical domain. While exact claim language is not provided herein, typical scope elements in pharmaceutical patents include:

  • Chemical Composition or Structure: Novel active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) or derivatives.
  • Formulation or Form: Specific dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, injections, topical preparations.
  • Method of Manufacturing: Unique processes or synthesis routes for active compounds.
  • Method of Use: Therapeutic applications, treatment methods, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Combination Therapy: Use of compound combinations for improved efficacy.
  • Stability or Bioavailability Enhancements: Technologies ensuring drug stability or absorption.

The scope of PL398653 likely emphasizes a particular innovation—such as a novel compound, formulation, or method—that addresses unmet needs or offers advantages over previous medications.

Scope limitations and variations

Patent claims define scope precisely and can be broadly or narrowly drafted:

  • Broad Claims: Cover a wide range of compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Narrow Claims: Focused on specific chemical entities, dosages, or clinical methods.

Given the common strategic approach in pharmaceutical patents, PL398653 may include both types, to maximize exclusivity while maintaining defensibility.


Claims Analysis

Typical Composition of Claims

Patent claims in pharmaceuticals follow a structured hierarchy:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest, defining core invention.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specifics or preferred embodiments.

Likely Claim Categories in PL398653

Note: Due to the unavailability of full claims text, the following is an informed approximation based on typical patent practices and available patent citation data.

  1. Compound Claims: Claims covering the particular chemical entity or derivative. For example, a novel compound with specific structural features that confer therapeutic benefits.

  2. Pharmaceutical Composition Claims: Claims covering the compound combined with carriers, excipients, or other pharmaceuticals, formulated for specific routes of administration.

  3. Method of Manufacturing Claims: Describing proprietary synthesis or formulation processes.

  4. Use Claims: Methods for treating particular diseases or conditions using the patented compound or composition.

  5. Combination Claims: Use or composition involving multiple active ingredients.

Claim Scope Implications

  • Broad claims can offer extensive protection but risk invalidation if challenged for lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Narrow claims provide targeted protection but are more vulnerable to design-around strategies.

The validity and enforceability depend on the patent’s drafting quality and prior art landscape, which must be analyzed comprehensively.


Patent Landscape of Poland and Broader International Context

Polish Patent Environment for Pharmaceuticals

Poland, as an EU member, follows the European Patent Convention (EPC), offering a robust legal framework for patent protection in pharmaceuticals—commonly through national grants or via the European patent route.

The patent landscape includes:

  • Major patentees: Large pharmaceutical firms and innovative biotech companies.
  • Research institutions: Focused on drug discoveries, often seeking patent protection via national or European routes.
  • Litigation trends: Usually involve disputes over patent validity, infringement, and patent term extensions.

Broader Patent Landscape Analysis

PL398653 exists within a convergence of multiple patent rights:

  • European patents (EP): Likely counterparts or family members.
  • US Patents (if applicable): Related filings in the USA.
  • International Patent Applications (PCT): Potential applications covering similar inventions.

Key considerations include:

  • Patent family scope: Whether similar claims are held across jurisdictions.
  • Prior art: Existing patents or publications that could challenge the novelty or inventive step of PL398653.
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO): Identifying whether products infringe patents in markets of interest.

Landscape Trends

Emerging trends include:

  • Biologics and biosimilars: Growing patent publications due to patent term expirations.
  • Drug delivery systems: Focus on oral, injectable, and transdermal formulations.
  • Combination therapies: Increasing patent filings on multi-component drugs.

Patent PL398653’s position within this landscape hinges on its specific claims, which impact its strength and enforceability.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

For Patent Holders

  • Strengthening Claims: Ensure claims are sufficiently broad to prevent easy design-arounds.
  • Monitoring Competitors: Track similar filings for possible infringement or invalidity challenges.
  • Defensive IP: Secure family members in key jurisdictions to extend protection.

For Competitors

  • Patent Landscape Mapping: Identify potential freedom-to-operate areas.
  • Design-Around Strategies: Focus on non-infringing variants based on claim limitations.
  • Challenging Validity: Use prior art searches to challenge the novelty or inventive step of PL398653.

For Legal and Commercial Teams

  • Infringement Risks and Licensing: Assess potential patent infringement and opportunities for licensing.
  • Patent Expiry Dates: Plan product lifecycle strategies accordingly.

Conclusion

Patent PL398653 exemplifies targeted pharmaceutical innovation within Poland, offering potentially broad protection based on its scope and claims. Its effectiveness hinges on the drafting precision of the claims and its positioning within the ongoing patent landscape. Stakeholders must continuously monitor and analyze both patent-specific and landscape-wide developments to optimize strategic decision-making.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of PL398653 likely encompasses a specific chemical entity, formulation, or method, with the potential for broad or narrow claims.
  • Its validity and enforceability are influenced by prior art and the quality of claim drafting.
  • The patent landscape includes numerous patents across jurisdictions, requiring strategic geographies for protection and FTO analyses.
  • Industry trends favor biologics, combination therapies, and innovative delivery systems, which may impact the patent's value.
  • Regular landscape monitoring and patent horizon management are essential for maintaining competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent PL398653?
While specific claim language is unavailable here, it generally pertains to a novel drug composition, method of manufacturing, or therapeutic use within the pharmaceutical sector.

2. How does the patent landscape in Poland compare to other markets for pharmaceuticals?
Poland adheres to EPC principles, aligning with European standards, but the patent landscape varies by country, with regional differences impacting patent strategies.

3. Can patent claims in PL398653 be challenged?
Yes, via invalidity actions based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, particularly if broader claims are asserted.

4. How does patent family coverage influence licensing opportunities?
A well-maintained patent family extending into key markets enhances licensing appeal and provides strategic protection across jurisdictions.

5. What are the risks associated with infringing on PL398653?
Infringement could lead to legal disputes, injunctions, or damages; hence, comprehensive FTO analysis is crucial before commercialization.


Sources
[1] Polish Patent Office official database and published patent documentation.
[2] EPO Espacenet patent family and citation data.
[3] European Patent Office guidelines on pharmaceutical patent claims.
[4] Industry reports on drug patent trends and landscape analyses.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.