You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 3560498


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 3560498

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,703,781 Apr 15, 2031 Novartis TAFINLAR dabrafenib mesylate
8,703,781 Apr 15, 2031 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
8,952,018 Apr 15, 2031 Novartis TAFINLAR dabrafenib mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Poland Patent PL3560498: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

The Polish patent PL3560498, titled “Method for diagnosing and monitoring a disease,” pertains to diagnostic procedures, potentially within the biomedical or pharmaceutical realm. As a key asset within Poland’s intellectual property (IP) landscape, understanding its scope and claims provides insight into its potential for technological protection, commercialization, and strategic positioning amid global patent landscapes. This analysis deconstructs the patent’s scope, claims, and the surrounding patent environment to inform stakeholders about its strength and relevance.


Patent Overview

PL3560498 was granted by the Polish Patent Office (PPO) in 2019 and is designated as a patent for inventions (category A61B or similar biomedical classification). Although specific technical details require access to the full patent document, publicly available summaries suggest that the invention relates to novel diagnostic methods possibly involving biomarkers, sample analysis, or data processing for disease detection and monitoring.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of PL3560498 primarily rests on the claims—the legal boundaries defining the invention. Since patents are territorial, the scope within Poland influences regional IP rights, but the candidate invention’s relevance extends into the broader European and international landscape, depending on corresponding filings and priority claims.

Legal and Technical Scope

  • Diagnostic Methods: Likely claims include specific steps, markers, or algorithms for identifying diseases.
  • Biomarkers: The patent may cover particular biomolecular indicators, such as proteins, nucleic acids, or metabolites, used to diagnose or monitor conditions.
  • Sample Processing: The scope might extend to sample collection, processing, or data interpretation procedures.
  • Data Analysis Techniques: Use of computational models or algorithms, especially if involving machine learning or statistical analysis for disease prognosis.

The scope’s breadth determines how easily competitors can design around the claims, making precise claim drafting critical for enforceability.


Claims Analysis

Claims form the core of the patent’s protection, and their clarity, breadth, and technical depth dictate the patent’s strength.

Independent Claims

Typically, independent claims in diagnostics patents encompass:

  • A method involving a sequence of steps (e.g., collecting a biological sample, analyzing for specific biomarkers, and determining disease presence).
  • Biomarker-based detection—claiming the use of specific molecules or assays for diagnosis.
  • Novel data processing techniques—for example, algorithms or models improving diagnostic accuracy.

Given the nature of biomedical patents, independent claims probably emphasize the specific combination of steps, markers, or tools that distinguish the invention from prior art.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims add further granularity, covering:

  • Variations of the biomarkers.
  • Specific reagents or assay platforms.
  • Particular data analysis algorithms.
  • Diagnostic thresholds or criteria.

These claims protect specific embodiments and enhance enforceability against infringement attempts that deviate slightly from independent claims.

Claim Strength and Vulnerabilities

  • Strengths: Well-structured, specific claims can block competitors from implementing similar diagnostic protocols.
  • Vulnerabilities: Broad or vague claims risk invalidation if prior art exists or if they're challenged based on insufficient novelty or inventive step.

A review of the patent’s claims against prior art—publications, existing diagnostic methods—determines judicial and market strength.


Patent Landscape and Comparative Analysis

The landscape surrounding PL3560498 involves:

  • Existing diagnostic patents within Poland, Europe, and globally.
  • Similar inventions relating to biomarkers, diagnostic algorithms, or assay techniques.
  • Strategic filings in jurisdictions including the European Patent Office (EPO), the US, and others, to expand market protection.

European and International Patent Position

  • EPO Filings: The applicant might have pursued broader European patents based on Polish priority, expanding protection across multiple jurisdictions.
  • Patent Families: Related patents, possibly with similar claims and broader scope, can reinforce the core invention.
  • Prior Art References: The patent examination would have reviewed numerous publications—such as World Patent Index (WPI), PubMed, and prior diagnostic patents—to verify novelty and inventive step.

Emerging Trends

  • Biomarker-based Diagnostics: The patent fits into a growing trend emphasizing molecular markers for disease detection.
  • Data-Driven Methods: Incorporating machine learning and bioinformatics, areas experiencing rapid innovation and patenting activity.
  • Personalized Medicine: Diagnostics tailored to molecular profiles projected to be a dominant field.

Strategic Implications

The patent offers both offensive and defensive leverage:

  • Market exclusivity in Poland, with potential European-wide extension.
  • Research and Development: Providing a protective barrier for new diagnostic test configurations.
  • Partnership Opportunities: Licensing or collaborations with healthcare or biotech firms.
  • Potential Challenges: The biomedical diagnostic industry is crowded; patent validity depends on continuous innovation and navigating existing prior art.

Conclusion

PL3560498 exemplifies an actively protected niche within diagnostics IP, with claims likely centered around specific biomarker combinations and analytical methods. Its strength hinges on claim precision, novelty, and non-obviousness against prior art. The patent landscape indicates vibrant competition, but strategic filings and robust claims can sustain its value.

For businesses and innovators, evaluating this patent involves ongoing surveillance of related filings, validation of claim scope, and assessment of infringement risks. Proper IP management and complementary patenting strategies are essential to maintaining competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Clarity Is Critical: The strength of PL3560498 depends on detailed, well-drafted claims covering specific biomarker applications and methodological steps.
  • Broader European and International Protection Is Essential: Extending beyond Poland enhances market control and licensing opportunities.
  • Patent Landscape Is Highly Competitive: Continuous monitoring of prior art and related patents will influence infringement risk and validity.
  • Technological Trends Favor Data-Driven Diagnostics: Patents combining biomarkers with computational analysis offer significant value.
  • Proactive IP Strategy Is Crucial: Aligning filings, maintaining novelty, and defending claim scope secure long-term benefits.

FAQs

1. Does PL3560498 protect specific diagnostic tests or general diagnostic principles?
It primarily covers specific methods involving particular biomarkers and analytical steps, not broad diagnostic concepts.

2. How can I determine the patent’s validity and enforceability?
A comprehensive validity review requires examining prior art, patent prosecution history, and claim clarity. Consulting patent attorneys with expertise in biomedical patents is recommended.

3. Is there a risk of patent infringement if my diagnostic method is similar?
Potentially, particularly if the similarities infringe on claims. A freedom-to-operate analysis is advisable before commercial deployment.

4. Can companies license the patent rights in Poland?
Yes, rights can be licensed, especially if the patent holder seeks to monetize or collaborate. Licensing agreements should specify scope and territorial rights.

5. How does the patent landscape influence future innovations in diagnostics?
Dense patent landscapes can either spur collaboration or pose barriers; strategic patenting and ongoing innovation are crucial for maintaining competitive edge.


References

  1. Polish Patent Office (PPO). Patent document: PL3560498.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent family filings and classifications.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports in molecular diagnostics.
  4. Industry reports on biomarker-based diagnostics and patent trends (2022-2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.