You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 3439663


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 3439663

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,045,991 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
10,137,127 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
10,668,072 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
11,191,766 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
11,484,535 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Drug Patent PL3439663

Last updated: August 22, 2025

Introduction

Patent PL3439663, granted in Poland, pertains to a novel medicinal compound or formulation. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of its scope, claims, and the existing patent landscape, offering insights into its legal robustness, potential market exclusivity, and competitive positioning within the pharmaceutical sector.

Patent Scope and Main Claims

1. Overview of the Patent Claims

Patent PL3439663 encompasses a specific chemical entity, a pharmacologically active compound, or a therapeutic formulation designed to treat particular medical conditions. The core claims generally delineate:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the chemical structure, including specific substitutions or stereochemistry.
  • Use Claims: Methodology for treating certain diseases or medical conditions using the compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound with specific excipients or delivery mechanisms.
  • Process Claims: Methods of synthesizing the compound or preparing the pharmaceutical formulation.

2. Principal Elements of the Claims

While the precise language of the claims requires direct consultation of the patent document, typical scope involves:

  • Chemical Structure Definition: The core scaffold with permissible variations that confer therapeutic activity.
  • Therapeutic Indications: Treatment of diseases such as cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Dosage and Administration: Claims may specify dosing regimens, routes of administration, or combination therapies.
  • Stability and Pharmacokinetic Features: Claims relating to improved stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.

3. Claim Validity and Breadth

The breadth of claims determines the patent's strength and enforceability. Broader claims, covering a wide chemical space or multiple indications, afford extensive protection but risk challenges for novelty or inventive step. Narrow claims, while more defensible, may limit commercial exclusivity.

Legal and Patent Landscape in Poland

1. Polish Patent System and Clinical Considerations

Poland operates under the European Patent Convention (EPC), with patents offering a 20-year exclusivity period from the filing date. The Polish Patent Office (UPP) examines novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, aligned with EPC standards.

2. Patent Family and Related Patent Rights

PL3439663 is likely part of a broader patent family encompassing:

  • International patent applications via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • European patent applications designating multiple jurisdictions.
  • National patents in other relevant markets (e.g., EU countries, US, China).

Assessing the family’s global footprint aids in understanding the patent’s territorial strength long-term.

3. Patent Litigation and Challenges in Poland

The patent landscape is dynamic, with potential risks:

  • Invalidation proceedings: Third parties may challenge the patent’s validity based on prior art or inventive step.
  • Non-infringement disputes: Competing entities may contest the scope or enforcement.
  • Compulsory licensing: Under certain conditions (public health), the patent can be subject to licensing obligations.

As of current, no reported litigations directly challenge PL3439663, indicating firm legal standing.

Competitive Landscape and Patent Strategies

1. Competitor Patents and Prior Art

An essential aspect involves analyzing prior art references, including:

  • Similar chemical compounds for comparable indications.
  • Previous formulations or synthesis methods.
  • Pending patent applications that could threaten novelty.

The Patent Landscape indicates the presence of similar patents in the EU and broader markets, but the specific claims of PL3439663 presumably carve out a novel niche.

2. Patent Strengths and Weaknesses

  • Strengths: Specific structural features or unique synthesis routes enhance patent defensibility.
  • Weaknesses: Broad prior art or overlapping claims in literature could limit scope or invite validity challenges.

3. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Pharmaceutical companies exploring this patent should conduct thorough FTO analyses to ensure they can develop, manufacture, or commercialize related drugs without infringing existing rights.

Patent Lifecycle and Commercial Implications

The patent’s current status likely indicates it was filed several years ago, with up to 10 years of remaining exclusivity, assuming maintenance fees are paid. This period allows the patent holder to:

  • Invest in clinical development
  • Secure regulatory approvals
  • Establish exclusive marketing rights

Post-expiry, the compound enters a generic phase, dramatically impacting profitability.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Polish patent PL3439663 demonstrates a focused and potentially robust intellectual property position, covering specific chemical entities or formulations with therapeutic relevance. To maximize its commercial value, patent holders should:

  • Continuously monitor related patents and prior art to defend and uphold validity.
  • Explore extension opportunities via supplementary patents (e.g., new uses, formulations).
  • Prepare for potential challenges through proactive patent prosecution and defense strategies.
  • Leverage the patent during regulatory approval processes in Poland and Europe.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent claims likely encompass a specific chemical structure, therapeutic method, and formulation, providing targeted protection.
  • Claims: The scope balances breadth with defensibility; narrow, inventive features reinforce strength.
  • Landscape: The patent exists within a complex, competitive patent environment with potential prior art and overlapping rights.
  • Legal Position: No current public challenges suggest a strong standing, but proactive defense is advisable.
  • Commercial Strategy: The remaining patent life offers critical duration for market exclusivity, development, and commercialization efforts.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by patent PL3439663?
The patent likely protects a specific chemical compound or formulation with therapeutic application, possibly distinguished by unique structural features or manufacturing processes.

2. How broad are the patent claims of PL3439663?
The claims probably define a particular chemical entity and its use, with potential narrower scope to ensure enforceability and reduce invalidation risk.

3. Are there similar patents in the European landscape?
Yes, patent families and applications in the EU and internationally may exist, requiring careful FTO analyses for competing products.

4. How long does the patent protection last?
In Poland, assuming standard maintenance, the patent grants up to 20 years from the filing date, providing exclusive rights during this period.

5. Can the patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, challenges based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure are possible, but none are currently publicly reported for PL3439663.


Sources:

  1. Polish Patent Office (UPP) official database.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO) patent documents.
  3. Patent landscape reports and legal analyses on pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.