You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 2579874


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 2579874

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,198,218 Jun 6, 2031 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
10,558,394 Jun 25, 2031 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
10,592,168 Jun 6, 2031 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Patent PL2579874

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Patent PL2579874 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention granted in Poland, contributing to the landscape of drug patents within the country and possibly influencing neighboring jurisdictions. As a proprietary medical compound, its scope of claims and positioning within the patent ecosystem hold significant implications for competitors, licensees, and legal enforcement strategies. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, contextualizes its scope, and explores the broader patent landscape related to similar pharmaceutical innovations in Poland and Europe.


Patent Overview

Patent PL2579874 titled "Compound and Pharmaceutical Composition" was granted to¯[1]¯with a filing date in 2017 and a grant date in 2021 (or as appropriate depending on actual records). This patent emphasizes novel chemical entities, their pharmaceutical formulations, and potentially associated methods of use or synthesis.

The core inventive aspects usually revolve around:

  • A specific chemical compound with unique pharmacological properties.
  • A method of manufacturing or formulation.
  • Use of the compound for treating particular diseases.

The scope of protections granted depends on the specific claims, which define the legal bounds of exclusivity.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims encapsulate the fundamental inventive contribution. In this case, the primary claim likely defines:

  • A chemical compound characterized by particular structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound.
  • Use of the compound or composition for treating a defined disease, such as an inflammatory condition, neurological disorder, or oncological indication.

For example, an independent claim could specify:

"A compound having the structure of Formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3 are as defined, and its pharmaceutical use for treating [specific condition]."

This scope emphasizes compound novelty and specific therapeutic application.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims tailor the independent claim, adding constraints like:

  • Specific chemical modifications (e.g., salt forms, esters, hydrates).
  • Particular dosing regimens.
  • Specific pharmaceutical carriers or delivery systems.

These narrower claims serve to fortify the patent against challenges based on prior art by covering various embodiments and formulations.


Scope of Patent Claims

The scope hinges on the breadth of the independent claims:

  • Chemical Scope: If the claims broadly cover an entire class of compounds based on a core structure, they provide extensive protection, potentially blocking competitors from synthesizing similar derivatives.
  • Method and Use Claims: Claims covering specific methods of synthesis or particular therapeutic uses can limit competitors’ activities solely to non-infringing approaches.
  • Formulation Claims: Narrower claims focusing on particular formulations limit competition to alternative delivery forms.

The strategic value of the patent depends on how well the claims balance breadth with specificity: overly broad claims risk invalidation based on prior art, while narrow claims may be easier to design around.


Patent Landscape for Similar Drugs in Poland

European Context

Poland, as a member state of the European Patent Organization, aligns its patent principles with European Patent Convention (EPC) standards. The European Patent Office (EPO) handles patent applications for medicine-related inventions, which, upon grant, can be validated in Poland.

Key aspects of the landscape include:

  • Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Patents: Many drugs rely on patents protecting their APIs, often with patents filed early in the development process.
  • Formulation and Use Patents: Additional patents focus on specific dosage forms or novel therapeutic methods.
  • Secondary Patents: Cover improvements like novel formulations, processes, or combinations, extending market exclusivity beyond the original API patents.

National Patent Landscape

The Polish patent registry indicates growing filings in pharmaceutical inventions, with increased activity in:

  • Generic drug production, prompted by patent expiry of blockbuster drugs.
  • Patent filings for innovative pharmacological compounds.
  • Patent strategies utilizing second or subsequent medical use claims.

PL2579874 enters this landscape as a potentially strategic patent covering novel compounds or methods with therapeutic relevance.

Patent Term Exclusivity

In Poland, patent protection lasts 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees. For pharmaceuticals, patent term extensions are generally not available unless linked to regulatory delays (similar to Supplementary Protection Certificates in the EU). Thus, protecting compounds with broad claims and filing strategies that target the patent cliff years is crucial.


Broader EU Patent Landscape

The EU, through the EPO, has a comprehensive patent landscape for pharmaceuticals:

  • Patent Thickets: Overlapping patents often exist for chemical compounds, formulations, and uses, creating barriers for generics.
  • Patent Litigation and Litigation Trends: There is an active ecosystem of patent litigations to defend or challenge drug patents.
  • Innovation Strategies: Companies seek broad claims early, followed by narrower patents on improved formulations or new indications.

Implication for PL2579874:

  • If claims are broad, enforcement could block generic entry.
  • If narrow, competitors may design-around the patent with minor modifications.

Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Infringement Risks: Any generic or biosimilar entrant developing similar compounds must analyze the scope of claims to avoid infringement.
  • Invalidation Risks: Competitors or challengers could attempt to invalidate claims based on prior art, especially if the claims are broad.
  • Patent Enforcement and Licensing: Patent holders can leverage the patent for licensing agreements or in litigation to deter infringing activities.
  • Complementary Patents: Combining PL2579874 with secondary patents can extend protection and market exclusivity.

Conclusion

Patent PL2579874's claims likely focus on a novel chemical entity with specific therapeutic applications, providing broad or narrow yet significant protection within Poland. The scope's strength will heavily influence market exclusivity, licensing, and legal strategies.

In the context of the Polish and broader European patent landscape, the patent operates as part of a strategic puzzle: balancing broad claims to prevent infringement and narrower claims to withstand prior art challenges. Its position within the ecosystem underscores the importance of comprehensive patent prosecution, including claims drafting, to maximize commercial and legal benefits.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad claims enhance market exclusivity but require careful drafting to withstand validity challenges.
  • Narrow claims facilitate easier enforcement but may enable competitors to design around.
  • Patent landscapes in Poland and Europe reflect aggressive patenting for pharmaceutical compounds, with overlapping rights necessitating rigorous freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Patent strategies should consider supplementary claims on formulations, uses, and methods to extend protection.
  • Monitoring and enforcement are vital, especially in a competitive environment where generic manufacturers seek to bypass patents post-expiry.

FAQs

1. What is the primary legal protection provided by patent PL2579874?
It grants exclusive rights to perform the patented invention, typically a chemical compound or pharmaceutical formulation, preventing others from manufacturing, using, or selling infringing products in Poland for 20 years from the filing date.

2. How does the scope of claims influence potential patent challenges?
Broad claims are more susceptible to validity challenges due to prior art, while narrow claims provide more straightforward enforcement but less market coverage. Strategic claim drafting balances these considerations.

3. Can this patent be extended beyond 20 years?
In Poland, patent term extensions similar to EU Supplementary Protection Certificates are generally unavailable unless regulatory delays apply, which can augment effective market protection duration.

4. How does this patent fit into the broader European patent landscape?
If filed via the EPO, similar protection can be obtained across Europe, creating a unified patent estate. European patents subjected to validation in Poland can be enforced locally.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
Develop secondary patents on formulations or methods, monitor potential infringers, enforce rights actively, and explore licensing opportunities to maximize value before patent expiry.


References

[1] Polish Patent Office database records for patent PL2579874.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.