Details for Patent: 10,592,168
Which drugs does patent 10,592,168 protect, and when does it expire?
Patent 10,592,168 protects SUBLOCADE and is included in one NDA.
This patent has forty-four patent family members in thirty-one countries.
Summary for Patent: 10,592,168
| Title: | Injectable flowable composition comprising buprenorphine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | The present invention is directed to a buprenorphine sustained release delivery system capable of delivering buprenorphine, a metabolite, or a prodrug thereof for a duration of about 14 days to about 3 months. The buprenorphine sustained release delivery system includes a flowable composition and a solid implant for the sustained release of buprenorphine, a metabolite, or a prodrug thereof. The implant is produced from the flowable composition. The buprenorphine sustained release delivery system provides in situ 1-month and 3-month release profiles characterized by an exceptionally high bioavailability and minimal risk of permanent tissue damage and typically no risk of muscle necrosis. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | Richard L. Norton, Andrew Watkins, Mingxing Zhou | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | Indivior UK Ltd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US16/693,726 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; Composition; Formulation; Device; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | US Patent 10,592,168: Buprenorphine Depot Injection Claims, Exclusivity, and Patent LandscapeUS Patent No. 10,592,168 protects a method of treating opioid dependence with a monthly subcutaneous buprenorphine depot formed from buprenorphine, poly(lactide-co-glycolide) or PLGA, and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone. The patent is directed primarily to clinical administration and pharmacokinetic performance, not merely to the composition itself. The commercial embodiment most closely associated with the claims is Sublocade, Indivior’s extended-release buprenorphine injection. The central claim covers a formulation containing approximately 18 wt% buprenorphine free base, 32 wt% PLGA, and 50 wt% N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, administered subcutaneously at approximately 28-day intervals. What does US Patent 10,592,168 protect?The independent claim requires every element below:
The claim is a method-of-use claim with formulation limitations. A competing product would generally need to satisfy both the formulation requirements and the claimed treatment-performance limitations to present a direct literal infringement risk. The claim does not require a particular brand, syringe, needle gauge, injection site, polymer supplier, or manufacturing process. It does require subcutaneous administration and the specified therapeutic use. What is the commercial formulation covered by the patent?Claim 22 identifies the most commercially relevant formulation:
A 300 mg dose of buprenorphine free base is separately covered by claim 12. The claims also cover formulations containing 3 mg to 900 mg of buprenorphine free base. The composition is designed to be injected as a flowable solution. After injection, contact with water or bodily fluid causes the formulation to form an in-situ depot or implant. NMP functions as the water-miscible organic solvent, while PLGA forms the biodegradable polymer matrix. How do the claims operate as a patent protection strategy?The patent uses overlapping claim layers rather than relying on one broad composition claim. Broad treatment claimClaim 1 covers treatment with a broad composition range:
The use of alternative pharmacokinetic limitations gives the claim several infringement pathways. The method may satisfy the claim through the 28-day concentration range, the narrower day-three-to-day-24 concentration range, or the less-than-10% 24-hour burst-release limitation. Pharmacokinetic dependent claimsClaims 2 and 3 narrow the method by requiring specified plasma concentrations:
These limitations are important because they connect patent scope to clinical and pharmacokinetic data. They also create evidentiary issues. An accused product may require clinical studies, pharmacokinetic modeling, product testing, or regulatory disclosures to determine whether the claimed concentration ranges are met. Burst-release claimClaim 4 covers a 24-hour buprenorphine burst release of less than 10%. This limitation targets early drug dumping after injection. A formulation that uses the same ingredients but produces a higher initial release could have a stronger noninfringement position against this dependent claim, although it could still implicate other claims. Dosing-interval claimsClaims 5 and 6 cover administration once every 28 days or once per month. These claims align closely with monthly depot treatment and materially increase risk for products using the same formulation architecture and dosing schedule. What formulations are protected by US 10,592,168?The formulation claims cover a wide technical range beyond the 18/32/50 formulation in claim 22.
Claim 14 covers multiple lactide:glycolide ratios, including 50/50, 55/45, 60/40, 65/35, 70/30, 75/25, 80/20, 85/15, 90/10, and 95/5. Claim 15 narrows the protection to 50/50 PLGA. Claim 21 expands the solvent system to NMP combined with glycerin, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, or combinations of those excipients. A competitor therefore cannot necessarily avoid the patent by adding a second organic liquid to NMP. What are the principal infringement issues?The patent’s highest-risk combination is:
The claim is narrower than a pure composition claim because the accused product must be administered for the claimed indication. It is broader than a product-specific claim because it does not require the Sublocade trademark, a particular device, or a particular manufacturing process. A design-around based only on a different dose may not be sufficient. The claims cover a large dose range, from 3 mg to 900 mg, and a broad buprenorphine concentration range. A change in polymer ratio, molecular weight, terminal group, solvent system, or dosing interval could be more relevant, but those changes must be assessed against the full claim set and related patent families. What is the Orange Book status of US 10,592,168?Sublocade is an FDA-approved extended-release buprenorphine injection for subcutaneous use in the treatment of moderate-to-severe opioid use disorder in patients who have initiated treatment with a transmucosal buprenorphine-containing product.[2] US Patent 10,592,168 is associated with the Sublocade patent estate and should be reviewed against the current FDA Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, commonly called the Orange Book, for the applicable listing status and patent-use-code information.[3] The Orange Book analysis must distinguish among:
The patent number alone does not establish the current regulatory listing, because Orange Book records can change through certifications, corrections, delistings, or FDA administrative updates. When does US 10,592,168 lose exclusivity?The patent’s expiration date cannot be calculated reliably from the March 17, 2020 issue date alone. US patent term generally runs 20 years from the earliest effective nonprovisional filing date, subject to patent-term adjustment, patent-term extension, terminal disclaimers, and other prosecution factors.[4] For commercial diligence, the relevant date should be taken from:
The patent’s practical exclusivity also depends on other Sublocade patents. Expiration of US 10,592,168 would not necessarily create immediate unrestricted generic entry if additional formulation, dosing, manufacturing, device, or method-of-use patents remain enforceable. Which companies are challenging the Sublocade patent estate?The principal competitive risks come from two groups:
Brixadi received FDA approval in 2023 for subcutaneous administration in weekly and monthly presentations.[5] Its presence reduces Sublocade’s commercial exclusivity even if no generic version directly practices the claims of US 10,592,168. Publicly available information should be reviewed for any Paragraph IV certification, ANDA litigation, inter partes review, or district-court action specifically naming US 10,592,168. A Paragraph IV challenge would typically target patent validity, noninfringement, unenforceability, or the scope of the listed method-of-use claims. Without a confirmed litigation docket, no specific challenger should be treated as having filed against this patent. What is the biosimilar risk?There is no conventional biosimilar pathway for Sublocade because buprenorphine is a small-molecule active pharmaceutical ingredient. Competitive products would generally proceed through an abbreviated new drug application, a 505(b)(2) application, or a full NDA, depending on the degree of formulation and clinical differentiation.[6] The main regulatory distinction is:
How strong is the patent estate for Sublocade compared with Brixadi?Sublocade has the stronger first-mover position in the US monthly injectable buprenorphine market, with FDA approval preceding Brixadi by several years. Its protection is distributed across formulation, depot formation, dosing, pharmacokinetics, and product-specific commercial rights. Brixadi creates a competitive alternative but does not automatically invalidate or avoid Sublocade patents. The relevant technical distinction is the delivery platform. A competing product with a different polymer-solvent system, release mechanism, or formulation composition may reduce direct infringement exposure while still competing clinically.
What generic launch scenarios exist?Scenario 1: Formulation-equivalent ANDAA generic uses buprenorphine, PLGA, NMP, subcutaneous administration, and a monthly regimen. This scenario has the highest exposure to US 10,592,168 and related Sublocade patents. A Paragraph IV certification and patent litigation would be likely if the patents remain listed and enforceable. Scenario 2: Different depot chemistryA competitor uses a different polymer, solvent, implant technology, or release mechanism. This may reduce literal infringement risk but could require a 505(b)(2) or NDA and additional clinical evidence. Scenario 3: Different dosing intervalA weekly or biweekly product may avoid the monthly dosing claims in claims 5 and 6. It could still implicate claim 1 if the formulation and claimed pharmacokinetic results are satisfied. Scenario 4: Alternative indication or labelingA product labeled for a different use may reduce method-of-use exposure, but off-label use, induced infringement, and the scope of any broader product or formulation patents remain relevant. What manufacturing and geographic barriers apply?The claims do not require a particular manufacturing process, but the formulation presents technical barriers:
US 10,592,168 is a United States patent. Parallel rights must be assessed separately in Europe, Canada, Japan, Australia, and other markets. A US noninfringement position does not establish freedom to operate outside the United States. International patent families may contain different claim scope, prosecution amendments, expiration dates, and opposition histories. What is the commercial exposure?Sublocade is Indivior’s principal long-acting injectable opioid-dependence product. Revenue exposure is material because a formulation-equivalent generic could compete directly on monthly dosing, procurement price, and payer coverage. Commercial erosion would depend on:
Key Takeaways
FAQsIs US 10,592,168 a composition patent or a method patent?It is principally a method patent. The claims require treating opioid dependence by subcutaneous administration of a defined buprenorphine-PLGA-NMP composition with specified pharmacokinetic or burst-release characteristics. Does changing the buprenorphine salt avoid the patent?Not necessarily. Claim 1 covers buprenorphine in the form of the free base or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt. A salt substitution alone may remain within the claim. Does a weekly buprenorphine injection avoid the patent?It may avoid the specific monthly dosing claims, but it could still raise issues under claim 1 if the composition, route, indication, and pharmacokinetic limitations are satisfied. Is NMP required in every claim?NMP is expressly required by claim 1. Claim 21 permits NMP in combination with glycerin, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, or combinations of those liquids. Can a different PLGA ratio avoid infringement?A different ratio may avoid the narrower 50/50 claim, but claim 14 covers a broad list of PLGA ratios, and claim 1 does not specify one particular lactide:glycolide ratio. The complete claim set and related patents must be analyzed together. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,592,168
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indivior | SUBLOCADE | buprenorphine | SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;SUBCUTANEOUS | 209819-001 | Nov 30, 2017 | RX | Yes | No | 10,592,168 | ⤷ Start Trial | TREATMENT OF MODERATE TO SEVERE OPIOID USE DISORDER | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| Indivior | SUBLOCADE | buprenorphine | SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;SUBCUTANEOUS | 209819-002 | Nov 30, 2017 | RX | Yes | Yes | 10,592,168 | ⤷ Start Trial | TREATMENT OF MODERATE TO SEVERE OPIOID USE DISORDER | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
International Family Members for US Patent 10,592,168
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2011263478 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Brazil | 112012031290 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Canada | 2801676 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
