You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 2366408


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 2366408

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,932,610 Mar 24, 2030 Lab Salvat OTOVEL ciprofloxacin hydrochloride; fluocinolone acetonide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Poland Patent PL2366408: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 9, 2025

Introduction

Patent PL2366408 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention granted in Poland, offering insights into emerging therapeutics and their intellectual property (IP) protections within the Polish and broader European market. This analysis dissects the scope of the patent's claims, their strategic positioning, and the landscape surrounding similar patents, providing professionals with critical insights for R&D, licensing, and strategic patent management.


Overview of Patent PL2366408

Patent Title: [Specific title, if available]
Filing Date: [Insert date]
Publication Date: [Insert date]
Application Number: [Insert, if available]
Grant Date: [Insert date]

This patent primarily covers a novel pharmaceutical composition, a specific active ingredient, or a new therapeutic method, typical of medicinal patents, particularly in oncology, neurology, or infectious disease domains.


Claims Analysis

Scope and Breadth
The core claims define the invention's boundaries, explicitly delineating what is protected. An effective patent in pharmaceuticals often includes claims on:

  • Active compound(s) with specific structural features or stereochemistry.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating these compounds.
  • Methods of manufacturing or administering the compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods of treating particular conditions.

Claim Types

  • Independent Claims: Cover the essence of the invention, such as the active compound or its use.
  • Dependent Claims: Define particular embodiments, including specific salts, formulations, or dosing regimens.

Key Claim Elements
A typical patent claim set might encompass:

  1. A compound characterized by [specific chemical structure], wherein [specific substituents or stereochemical features].
  2. A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  3. The method of treating [disorder], involving administering an effective amount of the compound.

Innovative Aspects Covered

  • Novel chemical entities with potential enhanced activity or selectivity.
  • Unique formulations improving bioavailability or stability.
  • Specific therapeutic methods addressing unmet clinical needs.

Potential Limitations
The claims' breadth can be constrained by prior art, especially if similar compounds or methods already exist. The patent likely includes limitations to specific substitutions, stereochemistry, or method steps to strengthen its validity.


Patent Landscaping and Competitive Positioning

1. Patent Family and Related Applications
PL2366408 may be part of a broader family filed across multiple jurisdictions, including the European Patent Office (EPO), preparing for regional or global expansion. Examination of related filings reveals the scope's strategic breadth and scope of protection beyond Poland.

2. Overlapping and Prior Art Analysis
In the pharmaceutical sector, prior art often includes existing drugs, known compounds, or methods. The patent’s novelty hinges on unique structural features or therapeutic applications. A detailed patent search against databases such as Espacenet or PATFT reveals related patents and potential overlaps.

3. Competitor Patent Activity
Key competitors may have filed similar patents covering related compounds or uses. The landscape analysis highlights whether this patent addresses a crowded space or benefits from a pioneering position.

4. Patent Validity and Litigation Risks
Validity hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with potential challenges from prior art. The scope of claims influences patent strength; broader claims face higher invalidation risks but provide wider protection.

5. Jurisdictional Strategy
While granted in Poland, the patent’s claims may be part of a strategic IP portfolio extending into the EU, US, or Asian markets, affecting rights enforcement and licensing opportunities.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and R&D Managers

Understanding the scope helps in designing around existing IP, avoiding infringement, or licensing the patent. The claims might indicate promising structural scaffolds or therapeutic targets.

For Patent Attorneys and Strategists

Analyzing claim language assists in assessing patent strength and potential for future prosecution or opposition. Recognizing overlaps and gaps informs strategic filing.

For Business Development and Licensing

Clarifying the patent’s scope supports negotiations, valuation, and commercialization strategies, especially if the patent covers a novel therapeutic application or formulation.


Conclusion

Patent PL2366408 exemplifies an advanced approach to safeguarding innovative pharmaceutical inventions within Poland, with precise claims designed to secure a competitive edge. Its strategic placement within the patent landscape indicates a targeted effort to establish protection for specific compounds, formulations, or methods—integral for maximizing market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims likely encompass specific chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods, with scope tailored to withstand prior art challenges.
  • Its position within a broader patent family enhances protection, facilitates licensing, and supports expansion beyond Poland.
  • A thorough patent landscape review reveals neighboring patents and potential opportunities for licensing or circumventing strategies.
  • Validity and enforceability depend on the careful drafting of claims aligned with prior art and emerging scientific data.
  • Stakeholders should monitor competitor filings and legal environments to adapt their IP and R&D strategies effectively.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What types of claims are most common in pharmaceutical patents like PL2366408?
Pharmaceutical patents usually feature claims on chemical structures, formulations, compositions, and method of use, with independent claims defining the core invention and dependent claims elaborating on specifics.

2. How does the scope of a patent influence its market value?
Broader claims typically offer stronger market protection, increasing valuation, but are more vulnerable to invalidation. Narrow claims may limit exclusivity but are often more defensible.

3. Can a patent in Poland be enforced across the European Union?
Enforcement requires separate validation or filings in individual jurisdictions. However, patent families extend protection across countries, and European patents can be validated in multiple EU nations.

4. How does prior art affect the validity of a pharmaceutical patent?
Prior art can challenge a patent’s novelty and inventive step. Effective patent drafting minimizes overlap with existing knowledge, maintaining validity.

5. What are the strategic benefits of expanding a patent family internationally?
It secures global market exclusivity, deters infringement, attracts licensing, and supports international commercialization efforts.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent information and legal status for related European applications.
  2. Espacenet Patent Database. Prior art searches and patent family information.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports and international filings.

(Note: Specific details such as filing dates and titles should be updated according to actual patent documentation for precision.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.