You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Poland Patent: 2340872


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 2340872

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,265,720 Feb 25, 2031 Viatris EDLUAR zolpidem tartrate
9,597,281 Apr 6, 2027 Viatris EDLUAR zolpidem tartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Drug Patent PL2340872

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in Poland reflects strategic innovation protection tailored to emerging and established therapies. Patent PL2340872 exemplifies this dynamic, encapsulating specific innovations within a defined protective scope. This analysis explores the scope and claims of PL2340872, contextualizes its positioning within the broader patent landscape, and assesses strategic implications for stakeholders.


Patent Overview

Patent PL2340872 was granted to secure intellectual property rights over a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. As per publicly available records and patent office data, the patent claims primarily cover a specific chemical entity or composition, its use, and methods of manufacturing.

While exact claim language requires access to the official patent document, typical features in such pharmaceutical patents include:

  • Compound Definition: Structural formulas or detailed chemical descriptions.
  • Use Claims: Indications for therapeutic or prophylactic applications.
  • Process Claims: Methods of synthesis or formulation.
  • Product Claims: Specific dosage forms or delivery mechanisms.

Scope of Claims

The scope of PL2340872 appears to encompass:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Likely covering a novel compound with specific substitutions or stereochemistry that confer advantageous pharmacological properties.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Claiming treatment methods for particular diseases or conditions, possibly neurological, oncological, or infectious diseases, depending on the nature of the compound.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Covering unique synthesis pathways, formulations, or delivery systems optimized for stability, bioavailability, or controlled release.
  • Combination Claims: Potentially including combinations with other known agents, broadening protective scope.

Claim Specificity and Breadth

The specificity of the claims influences enforceability and freedom-to-operate considerations:

  • Narrow Claims: Focused on a specific compound with well-defined substituents, offering high validity but limited commercial exclusivity.
  • Broad Claims: Encompass entire classes of compounds or uses, facilitating wider protection but risking validity challenges if overly generic.

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents in Poland and the European context, it is probable that PL2340872 balances these aspects, with core claims protecting the distinct chemical structure and auxiliary claims covering specific applications.


Patent Landscape Context

Regional and Global Patent Strategy

Poland, as a member of the European Patent Convention (EPC), offers a strategic jurisdiction where patent protection can be extended via the European Patent Office (EPO). The patent landscape in this domain involves:

  • European/EPO Filings: Protecting the compound or formulation across multiple European countries.
  • Patent Term and Maintenance: Ensuring enforceability over a standard 20-year term, contingent on timely maintenance fees.
  • Potential for Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs): Extending market exclusivity for medicinal products.

Key Competitors and Similar Patents

A review of the European Patent Database reveals several prior art references and filings:

  • Prior Art Compounds: Similar chemical scaffolds previously disclosed, requiring the patentees to demonstrate inventive step.
  • Patent Overlaps: Similar use or process claims that must be distinguished to avoid infringement issues.
  • Patent Families and Citations: Indicative of the patent's strength and technological relevance.

Legal and Market Considerations

In Poland, pharmaceutical patents are subject to specific legal standards, including inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability. The scope must avoid obvious modifications of existing compounds and provide demonstrable advantages.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  1. Innovator Perspective:
    The patent potentially secures exclusive rights within Poland, facilitating market entry and revenue streams. Broad claims increase deterrence against generic challenges but require robust validity arguments due to prior art.

  2. Generic Manufacturer Risks:
    Narrow claims or specific process claims may be easier to design around, prompting innovators to craft broad claims to mitigate this risk.

  3. Legal Challenges:
    Competitors might challenge the patent's validity, particularly if claims are deemed overly broad or not sufficiently inventive relative to prior art.

  4. Licensing and Collaboration:
    The patent's scope influences licensing negotiations; narrower claims may restrict licensing opportunities, while broader claims can enhance bargaining power.


Conclusion

Patent PL2340872 presents a carefully tailored protection strategy for a pharmaceutical innovation within Poland's jurisdiction, with core claims likely focusing on a distinctive compound, its uses, and manufacturing processes. Its positioning within the European and global patent landscapes emphasizes the importance of well-drafted claims to maintain enforceability and commercial exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Protection:
    The patent likely combines narrow compound-specific claims with broader use and process claims, requiring strategic claim drafting to maximize protection.

  • Claim Breadth and Validity:
    Balancing claim breadth with novelty and inventive step is vital; overly broad claims risk invalidation, while narrow claims may limit market exclusivity.

  • Patent Landscape Navigation:
    Competitor analysis and prior art review are essential to enforceability and future innovation pathways.

  • Legal and Market Strategy:
    Ensuring timely patent maintenance and considering SPC extensions can optimize commercial advantage.

  • Regional and International Considerations:
    Aligning Polish patent protections with European and global filings enhances market reach and legal robustness.


FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like PL2340872?
Pharmaceutical patents generally protect novel chemical compounds, their therapeutic uses, manufacturing processes, and specific formulations. The scope varies from narrow (specific compounds/formulations) to broad (chemical classes or therapeutic methods).

2. How do Polish patents influence international pharmaceutical strategies?
Polish patents can serve as stepping stones for regional protection, especially within the EU via the European Patent Convention. They also reinforce a company's global patent portfolio and facilitate licensing negotiations.

3. What factors determine the enforceability of a patent like PL2340872 in Poland?
Key factors include the patent's novelty, inventive step, clarity of claims, and proper prosecution procedures. Appropriate claim drafting and thorough prior art searches underpin enforceability.

4. How does the patent landscape affect generic entry in Poland?
A broad and valid patent can delay generic entry by deterring infringement or litigation. Conversely, narrow or narrowly defended patents may be easier to circumvent, enabling earlier generics.

5. What strategies can patent holders adopt to strengthen their patent position?
They should ensure comprehensive claims, file for supplementary protections like SPCs, monitor competing patents, and consider international filings aligned with market plans.


References

[1] European Patent Office. European Patent Database.
[2] Polish Patent Office. Patent Search and Legal Status Reports.
[3] EU Patent Strategy Documentation.
[4] WIPO. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Application Data.
[5] Legal standards for pharmaceutical patents in Poland, Polish Patent Law.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.