You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 2301531


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 2301531

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 21, 2026 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 13, 2027 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 21, 2026 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 21, 2026 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Patent PL2301531

Last updated: October 19, 2025


Introduction

Patent PL2301531 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in Poland, ensuring exclusive rights over a specific medicinal compound, formulation, or method. Assessing the scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape for this patent provides critical insights for competitors, licensing entities, and patent strategists. Here, we systematically dissect the elements of the patent’s claims, analyze its scope, and explore the broader patent ecosystem within Poland, especially as it relates to the therapeutic class or active compound involved.


Overview of Patent PL2301531

Patent PL2301531 was granted (or applied for) in Poland, a member of the European Patent Organization, providing protection within Poland and potentially serving as a basis for further regional filings (European, EU, or international). The patent’s documentation—likely published via the Polish Patent Office—defines the scope through its independent and dependent claims, which articulate the novel features versus the known prior art.

The patent’s core invention appears to involve a specific pharmaceutical composition or process, possibly in the realm of oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, depending on the applicant’s focus. The detailed description supports the claims by elaborating on the inventive step, dosages, formulations, or synthesis methods.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of Patent PL2301531 hinges on the wording of its claims, which delineate the protected subject matter. The scope is typically divided into:

  • Independent claims: Broadly define the main inventive concept. They set the legal boundaries of the patent's protection.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower, elaborating specific embodiments, formulations, or alternative implementations.

In the case of PL2301531, the independent claim likely covers:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient(s), potentially with a novel excipient or delivery system.
  • A method of treatment involving administering the composition to a patient with certain conditions.
  • A synthesis process for preparing the active compound or formulation with specific parameters.

Assessment of claim breadth:
The scope’s breadth influences the patent’s strength and infringement opportunities. For instance, claims that encompass a broad class of compounds or formulations provide wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation through prior art. Conversely, narrowly tailored claims protect specific embodiments.

Official Language and Claim Interpretation:
Polish patent law adheres to standards similar to EPC (European Patent Convention). Claims are interpreted based on their plain language, the description, and the overall specification, emphasizing inventive step and novelty.


Claim Analysis and Potential Limitations

  1. Novelty and Inventive Step:
    Claims must distinguish the invention over prior art—existing patents, publications, or public use. A thorough prior art search reveals whether claims are sufficiently inventive and whether they extend beyond known technologies.

  2. Scope of Protection:
    The claims likely focus on specific chemical structures, enter formulations, or innovative delivery mechanisms. However, if claims are too broad, they risk being challenged or invalidated; if too narrow, competitors can easily design around them.

  3. Claim Dependencies:
    Dependent claims specify particular embodiments—such as a specific dosage range, excipient, or method parameter—adding robustness against invalidation.

  4. Potential for Patent Thickets:
    The patent landscape surrounding PL2301531 includes other patents in related classes—e.g., chemical synthesis, delivery devices, or biomarkers—potentially leading to a complex network of overlapping rights. Analyzing patent families and related filings reveals whether the patent is part of a larger strategic portfolio.


Patent Landscape in Poland

Poland’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is dynamic, with notable activity in:

  • Innovative drug inventions: Focus on molecules with potential medical value.
  • Formulation patents: Protecting specific delivery systems or compositions.
  • Method-of-use patents: Covering new therapeutic indications.

Given Poland’s alignment with the European patent system, many pharmaceutical innovations tend to be filed as European applications, with national validations including Poland. The landscape features prominent local and international players such as Teva, Polpharma, and Pfizer, competing in similar therapeutic areas.

Prevalent Patent Strategies:

  • Patent families: Applicants often file corresponding patents across Europe to maximize territorial coverage.
  • Patent term extensions: To compensate for long testing periods, extensions are sometimes sought.
  • Freedom-to-operate considerations: Screening the existing portfolio and prior art informs whether PL2301531 faces potential infringement issues.

Active competitors in related fields routinely file patents on the same or similar compounds, or on incremental modifications, creating a dense patent landscape. This environment influences licensing opportunities, patent litigation risks, and R&D trajectories.


Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate Analysis

A thorough legal assessment considers whether existing patents in Poland could block the commercialization of products patented under PL2301531. Factors include:

  • The scope of claims versus proposed products.
  • Whether formulations or methods infringe equivalents.
  • The existence of blocking patents or patent applications.

Economically, patentholders should consider lateral patenting strategies—such as filing subsequent patents on improvements or formulations—to reinforce protection.


Legal Status and Maintenance

Patent PL2301531’s legal status influences strategic decisions. If active, maintaining the patent involves paying renewal fees, which vary annually. Inactive or expired patents open opportunities for generic development, licensing, or litigation.


Conclusion

Patent PL2301531 exemplifies a tailored, potentially broad, pharmaceutical protection within Poland, contingent on claim language and prior art. Its scope depends on the precise wording of independent claims, with a strategic advantage in claiming significant innovation while avoiding overly broad claims vulnerable to invalidation. The Polish patent landscape is characterized by competitive overlapping rights, making comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses essential for commercialization strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The strength of PL2301531 hinges on carefully drafted claims balancing breadth and defensibility.
  • Its position within Poland’s active pharmaceutical patent landscape necessitates vigilance over related patents and prior art.
  • Strategic patenting, including family and dependent claims, maximizes territorial and legal protection.
  • A detailed freedom-to-operate analysis is critical before product launch or licensing.
  • Ongoing surveillance of patent status and maintenance is vital for sustained exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the typical lifespan of a pharmaceutical patent in Poland?
Pharmaceutical patents in Poland generally last 20 years from the filing date, subject to renewal payments, with possible extensions for patent term adjustments related to regulatory delays.

2. Can a Polish patent protect a drug globally?
No. It grants protection only within Poland. To secure rights elsewhere, applicants must file corresponding patents in other jurisdictions or via regional systems like the European Patent Office.

3. How does the scope of claims affect patent infringement?
Broader claims increase infringement risk but provide wider protection. Narrow claims limit infringement scope but are easier to defend. Precise claim drafting is crucial for robust protection.

4. What are common challenges faced during patent prosecution for pharmaceuticals?
Challenges include overcoming prior art rejections, ensuring inventive step, drafting claims that are both broad and defensible, and satisfying specific regulatory and patentability criteria.

5. How does patent landscape analysis benefit pharmaceutical R&D?
It identifies innovation gaps, avoids infringement, supports licensing negotiations, and guides strategic patent filings to protect competitive advantages.


Sources:

  1. Polish Patent Office (Urząd Patentowy Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej). (2023). Official patent register and documentation.
  2. European Patent Office. (2023). Patent information and classifications.
  3. WIPO. (2023). International Patent Classification and patent filing procedures for pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.