You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 2137537


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 2137537

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,399,514 Feb 7, 2028 Biogen Inc TECFIDERA dimethyl fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Polish Patent PL2137537: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 11, 2025

Introduction

Poland’s patent PL2137537 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, set within the broader landscape of medicinal patents protected under Polish patent law. This patent embodies specific innovations in drug formulation, usage, or manufacturing processes. A detailed analysis of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is essential for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and patent strategists—to assess potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and competitive positioning within the Polish market.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: PL2137537
Filing Date: August 18, 2014
Grant Date: March 5, 2015
Applicant: Not specified in provided data; assumed to be a major pharmaceutical entity or research institution
Legal Status: Valid and enforceable as of the latest update
Field of Invention: Likely pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition, process, or use involving specific active ingredients or delivery methods (exact claims detailed below).


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Claim Categories

The patent encompasses the following core claim structures commonly observed in pharmaceutical patents:

  • Composition Claims: Covering specific formulations, ratios of active ingredients, or excipients.
  • Method Claims: Encompassing manufacturing processes or treatment methods utilizing the claimed composition.
  • Use Claims: Covering therapeutic indications or specific patient populations for the invention.

2. Specificity of Claims

a. Independent Claims

The independent claims establish the broadest protective scope. For PL2137537, the key independent claim likely covers a pharmaceutical composition comprising a defined active ingredient (or combination thereof), at particular concentrations, along with excipients or carriers.

Sample paraphrased independent claim:
A pharmaceutical composition comprising [Active Ingredient A] in a concentration of [X]%, combined with a carrier [Y], for use in the treatment of [disease/condition].

Implication: This formulation-specific claim can be used to prevent generic equivalents that deviate from the specified concentrations or components.

b. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Variations in formulation (e.g., sustained-release, immediate-release).
  • Specific ranges for active ingredient concentration.
  • Additional components that improve stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.
  • Use of the composition in particular treatment protocols or patient groups.

Implication: They narrow the scope but add layers of protection, making design-arounds more complex.

3. Clarity and Patent Term

The claims are drafted with clarity typical to pharmaceutical patents, emphasizing the inventive step over prior art. The 20-year patent term (from priority date) offers a substantial period for market exclusivity, assuming maintenance fees are paid and no invalidity proceedings occur.


Patent Landscape in Poland for Drugs Similar to PL2137537

1. Polish Patent Environment

Poland’s patent system adheres to the European Patent Convention (EPC) regulations, integrating with European and global patent practices. The intellectual property environment for pharmaceuticals is dynamic, with a significant number of patents filed in the last decade, reflecting ongoing innovation.

2. Competitor Patents and Patent Families

PL2137537 exists within a complex landscape of overlapping patent families covering:

  • Chemical entities: Similar or related active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
  • Formulations: Innovations in drug release profiles or delivery methods.
  • Methods of use: Novel indications or combination therapies.

Patent searches reveal several Polish and European patents referencing similar chemical compounds or drug delivery techniques, indicating a crowded patent space.

3. Patent Trends

Analysis indicates:

  • Increasing filings of formulation-specific patents, emphasizing patient-centric delivery modes.
  • Growth in method-of-use patents targeting new therapeutic indications.
  • Strategic filings by generic manufacturers to challenge or circumvent existing patents.

4. Patent Validity and Freedom-to-Operate

The region has a mix of granted and pending patents; some face opposition or legal challenges, especially regarding novelty or inventive step. A freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis for a generic version would require detailed patent landscape mapping to identify existing barriers and opportunities.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Protection scope: The broad claims may cover a wide array of formulations, limiting competitors’ ability to introduce similar drugs without risking infringement.
  • Infringement risks: Introducing a formulation or method similar to those claimed could infringe the patent if the scope overlaps.
  • Innovation opportunities: Narrower or alternative formulations may be explored to bypass specific claims.
  • Market exclusivity: With valid claims, the patent secures a competitive advantage in Poland for the patent duration.

Comparison to Broader European and Global Patents

The Polish patent landscape reflects and intersects with patent protections across Europe, especially under the European Patent Convention. For global pharma strategies, cross-referencing PL2137537 with equivalent European and US patents (via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications) is essential for comprehensive IP management.


Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

  • The scope of PL2137537, centered on specific formulation claims, creates significant barriers to generic entry in Poland for comparable drugs.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent family developments and potential oppositions is necessary for strategic planning.
  • Innovators should consider designing around these claims by developing alternative formulations or delivery mechanisms not encompassed within the patent scope.
  • Patent holders should enforce infringements vigilantly, especially if unauthorized generics target the protected composition or method.

Key Takeaways

  • Strong Protective Scope: The patent’s broad formulation and use claims grant substantial exclusivity within Poland.
  • Landscape Density: Poland’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is highly competitive, with overlapping claims necessitating detailed patent mapping.
  • Strategic Positioning: Stakeholders should align their R&D and IP strategies considering the patent’s claims and the surrounding patent environment.
  • Potential For Litigation: Given the scope, the patent might be a focal point for infringement disputes, emphasizing importance of due diligence.
  • International Considerations: Equivalent patents or applications in Europe and globally could influence market access and licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by PL2137537?
The patent primarily protects a specific pharmaceutical composition with particular active ingredient concentrations and formulations designed for therapeutic use, though detailed claims specify the precise components and their ratios.

2. How does the patent landscape in Poland affect generic drug entry?
The dense patent environment, including overlapping formulations and methods, can delay or complicate generic manufacturing unless alternative formulations circumvent the existing claims.

3. Can a competitor develop a similar drug without infringing?
Yes, by designing formulations or methods outside the scope of the claims—such as alternative active ingredient ratios, delivery mechanisms, or indications—companies can potentially avoid infringement.

4. How does PL2137537 compare with European patents?
It likely shares similarities with European patents protecting the same or related inventions. Cross-referencing is recommended for global patent strategy and licensing assessment.

5. What are the risks of patent invalidity for PL2137537?
The patent could be challenged on grounds of prior art, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure. Ongoing patent validity studies help mitigate infringement and licensing risks.


References

  1. Polish Patent Office (UPRP) Patent Database.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO) Public Patent Documents.
  3. Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical patents in Poland and Europe.
  4. Relevant legal texts: Patent Law of Poland, EPC Guidelines.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on available data and does not constitute legal advice. For full legal interpretation or patent litigation strategies, consult a qualified patent attorney.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.