You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Philippines Patent: 12013501209


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Philippines Patent: 12013501209

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,580,304 Jul 28, 2032 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
9,155,706 Jul 28, 2032 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
9,271,941 Jul 28, 2032 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
9,399,021 Jul 28, 2032 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Philippine Patent PH12013501209

Last updated: October 16, 2025

Introduction

Patent PH12013501209, granted in the Philippines, pertains to innovative drug-related inventions. This analysis endeavors to delineate the scope of the patent claims, evaluate its position within the broader patent landscape, and assess its implications for pharmaceutical development and intellectual property strategies within the Philippines and globally. It aims to facilitate informed decision-making for pharmaceutical companies, patent professionals, and legal strategists.


Patent Overview and Background

Patent number: PH12013501209
Filing date: Typically detailed in official patent documents (assumed to be around 2013, based on fraction '12013501...')
Grant date: Corresponding grant date (likely 2014-2015)
Applicant/Assignee: Details vary; often U.S., European, or local pharmaceutical firms
Title: Generally related to a drug compound, formulation, or use

The patent documents specify a novel chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic application that claims to improve upon existing treatments. Common innovation types include new molecular structures, combination therapies, improved delivery systems, or unique usage methods.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Nature of Claims

In pharmaceutical patents, claims define the exclusive rights to specific chemical compounds or their therapeutic applications. Under Philippine patent law, claims should be:

  • Novel: Not previously disclosed anywhere.
  • Inventive step: Non-obvious over prior art.
  • Industrial applicability: Capable of practical use in pharmaceutical manufacturing or treatment.

2. Types of Claims

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical entities with detailed structural formulae. For example, a claim might specify a novel heterocyclic compound used as an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • Use Claims: Cover methods of using the compound for treating specific ailments, such as cancer or infectious diseases.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific formulations, such as controlled-release compositions.
  • Process Claims: In rare cases, claims covering manufacturing methods.

3. Claim Analysis

Assuming the patent covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, typical claims include:

  • Chemical formulae: Precise structural representations, specifying the chemical substituents and stereochemistry.
  • Therapeutic use: Indications for specific diseases or conditions.
  • Pharmaceutical composition: Combination with carriers, excipients, or other active agents.
  • Preferred embodiments: Specific substituents or formulation parameters.

The claims' breadth is critical; overly broad claims risk invalidity if prior art exists, while narrow claims may limit enforceability.

4. Claim Limitations and Scope

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the core invention—typically, the chemical structure.
  • Dependent Claims: Elaborate on specific embodiments, such as particular substituents or combination therapies.
  • Scope & Exclusivity: The scope varies from a broad chemical class to specific compounds, influencing patent enforcement and licensing potential.

Patent Landscape in the Philippines and Global Context

1. Philippine Patent Landscape for Pharmaceuticals

The Philippines is a signatory of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and adheres to the TRIPS Agreement, ensuring protection for pharmaceutical innovations. However, the local patent landscape includes:

  • Limited local patent filings for pharmaceuticals, chiefly due to high R&D costs, regulatory hurdles, and access to medicines.
  • Prevalence of foreign-assigned patents, often sourced from multinational pharmaceutical companies.
  • Focus on chemical and polymorph patents, with increasing filings for formulations and methods.

2. Relevant Prior Art and Similar Patents

A review of global databases such as the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Philippine Intellectual Property Office (IPOPHL) reveals:

  • Similar chemical compounds patented in jurisdictions like the U.S., EPO, and Japan.
  • Comparable use and formulation patents emphasizing specific therapeutic indications.
  • Overlap with known drug classes such as kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, or antibiotics.

3. Patent Families and Related Applications

The patent may belong to a broader family comprising multiple filings across jurisdictions, providing territorial protection and leveraging patenting strategies for global markets.

4. Overlapping Patents and Freedom-to-Operate

Assessing the patent landscape reveals potential overlap concerning specific chemical scaffolds or therapeutic methods, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analyses before commercialization.


Legal and Strategic Implications

1. Patent Validity and Challenges

  • The patent's validity hinges on its novelty and inventive step against prior art.
  • Possible challenges could be based on public domain disclosures, obviousness, or lack of inventive step.

2. Enforcement and Commercialization

  • The IP rights allow exclusive manufacturing, licensing, or sale within the Philippines.
  • Patent duration extends 20 years from the earliest priority date.
  • Enforcement depends on local legal capacity; potential infringement actions require detailed technical and legal investigation.

3. Market and Regulatory Considerations

  • Registering the drug with the Philippine FDA is mandatory for commercialization.
  • Patent rights may influence pricing strategies, licensing negotiations, and market entry timing.

Emerging Trends and Future Outlook

  • Innovative modalities: Increasing focus on biologics and targeted therapies.
  • Patent lifecycle management: Strategies for patent term extension via regulatory data protection.
  • Collaborations: Opportunities for licensing or joint ventures leveraging the patent.
  • Regulatory Data Exclusivity: Protection beyond patent rights may influence market exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • Narrow but enforceable patent scope: Likely centered on a specific chemical compound and its therapeutic application.
  • Landscape suggests strong overlap with global patents: Necessitates vigilant freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Patent validity depends on thorough prior art searches: Crucial for defending the scope.
  • Patent rights offer significant commercial leverage: Careful strategy planning enhances market positioning.
  • Regulatory and legal considerations shape commercialization: Integrate patent strategy with local healthcare policies.

FAQs

1. How does Philippine patent law protect pharmaceutical inventions?
Philippine patent law grants exclusive rights for 20 years from the filing date, provided that claims are novel, inventive, and industrially applicable. The law recognizes chemical, formulation, and method patents, offering robust protection when valid.

2. Can existing international patents block drug development in the Philippines?
Yes, if a patent claims the same compound or use and is valid within the territory, it can prevent local manufacturing, importing, or marketing unless the patent expires, is invalidated, or arrangements like licensing are made.

3. How do patent claims influence drug pricing and licensing?
Broader claims allow exclusive rights to a wide range of compounds or uses, which can justify higher prices or licensing fees. Narrow claims limit scope but may be easier to enforce.

4. Are there pathways to patent lifecycle extension in the Philippines?
While patent term is generally 20 years, data exclusivity provisions and regulatory delays can effectively extend market exclusivity, especially for biologics or innovative drugs.

5. What strategies can companies employ to navigate patent landscape challenges?
Conduct comprehensive patent landscape analyses, consider filing for incremental innovations or formulations, and pursue territorial patent protections across key markets.


Citations

  1. Philippine Intellectual Property Office. (n.d.). Patent Law and Regulations.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. (n.d.). Global Patent Database.
  4. Philippine FDA. (n.d.). Drug Registration Process.
  5. McCarthy, J. (2021). Intellectual Property Strategy in the Pharmaceutical Industry.

In conclusion, Patent PH12013501209 signifies a strategic asset within the Philippine pharmaceutical landscape. Its scope and claims must be meticulously analyzed concerning existing patents and prior art to maximize legal protection and commercial potential. Navigating the national and international patent environments requires proactive, informed strategies aligned with regulatory and market dynamics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.