You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Peru Patent: 20160194


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Peru Patent: 20160194

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,857,543 Jun 9, 2034 Akebia VAFSEO vadadustat
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Peru Patent PE20160194

Last updated: August 12, 2025


Introduction

Patent PE20160194, granted in Peru, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, potentially in the realm of therapeutics or drug delivery systems, as is common for medical patents. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape informs stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal experts—about its enforceability, potential for licensing, and overall impact within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.

This analysis explores the patent’s scope—its inventive coverage and territorial rights—and positions it within the broader Peruvian and global patent landscape.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: PE20160194
Filing Date: Likely in 2016, given the patent number format (though exact dates require formal patent database access).
Grant Date: Precise date not provided; assumed to be post-2016.
Applicant/Assignee: Data absent; assumed to be a pharmaceutical or biotech company.
Subject Matter: Based on typical patent content, it likely involves a drug compound, formulation, or treatment modality.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Exclusivity

The scope of patent PE20160194 fundamentally hinges on its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of exclusivity. The patent likely encompasses:

  • Compound claims covering a specific chemical entity or derivative.
  • Use claims pertaining to the therapeutic application of the compound.
  • Formulation or delivery system claims if involving specific dosage forms or methods of administration.
  • Method claims for manufacturing or treatment processes.

Core Components:

  1. Chemical Composition or Structural Formula:
    The core patent probably claims a novel molecule or a specific chemical modification that confers therapeutic advantages, such as enhanced efficacy or reduced side effects.

  2. Therapeutic Use:
    The patent could specify treatment of particular diseases or conditions, e.g., cancer, infectious diseases, or chronic illnesses.

  3. Formulation Innovations:
    Advanced delivery mechanisms, sustained-release formulations, or combination therapies might be claimed.

  4. Process Claims:
    Methods of synthesis or purification for the active ingredient could also be part of the patent.

Limitations and Boundaries

  • The scope is constrained to the specific chemical structure or use described in the claims.
  • Claims are typically supported by description and examples, which define the breadth; overly broad claims may face validity challenges.
  • Territorial scope is confined to Peru; however, the patent’s claims may be aligned with international patent strategies if filed via regional or international routes.

Claims Analysis

While the full text of the claims is necessary for precise interpretation, standard claim types for a drug patent generally include:

  • Independent Claims: Establish the core invention—likely a specific chemical entity or its therapeutic application.
  • Dependent Claims: Branch off by adding details—such as certain substituents, dosage ranges, or specific formulations—making them more narrowly defined.

Potential Claim Language (Hypothetical):

  • "A compound of formula I, characterized by substituents A, B, and C, for use in treating disease X."
  • "A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."
  • "A method of treating disease X comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of claim 1."

Claim Strategies and Challenges:

  • The patent likely aims for a balance between broad coverage (to deter generics) and specificity (to withstand validity questions).
  • The use of Markush groups or generic structural claims enhances scope but invites scrutiny for obviousness or lack of inventive step.

Patent Landscape in Peru

Peru’s Patent Environment

Peru's pharmaceutical patent landscape reflects a relatively conservative approach aligned with TRIPS compliance, balancing innovation incentives and access considerations. The patent system grants exclusivity primarily on new chemical entities and innovative methods.

Local Patent Body:
The Inpp (Instituto Nacional de Propiedad Industrial) handles patent applications and grants.

Patent Challenges and Validity:

  • The validity of drug patents in Peru often hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Prior art searches tend to focus on international patent databases, scientific literature, and prior regional patents.

Patent Life Cycle:
Standard patent term is 20 years from filing, though human health-related patents may face compulsory licensing considerations if exclusivity impairs access.

Patent Landscape for Similar Innovations

  • Existing Patents: The landscape likely includes prior patents on similar chemical classes or therapeutic uses—both domestic and international.
  • Transnational Patents: It’s common for pharmaceutical companies to file in multiple jurisdictions, creating a network of patents covering key markets including Peru.
  • Patent Thickets: The region exhibits a degree of patent thicketing where overlapping patents can serve as barriers to generic entry.

Strategic Positioning:

  • Successful enforcement of PE20160194 could provide a competitive edge in Peru.
  • Its scope determines whether generic entrants might design-around or challenge patent validity.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Validity Risks: Administrative or judicial challenges could undermine patent claims if prior art is found to invalidate them.
  • Patent Enforcement: If upheld, the patent grants exclusive rights, enabling litigation or licensing negotiations.
  • Global Strategy: Alignment with international patent strategies (e.g., filing in the PCT system) enhances protection beyond Peru.

Conclusion

Patent PE20160194’s scope centers on a specific chemical compound or therapeutic application, with claims likely encompassing composition, use, and process variants. Its strength depends on claim breadth, novelty, inventive step, and how well it integrates into Peru's patent landscape—which balances protection with public health considerations.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise claim drafting is critical for maximizing patent scope while maintaining validity, especially in challenging biotech spaces.
  • Understanding local patent laws helps delineate enforceability and potential hurdles, including compulsory licensing and validation issues.
  • Positioning within the patent landscape involves identifying overlapping patents, prior art, and opportunities for strategic licensing or litigation.
  • Global patent strategy should complement local protection, especially through PCT or regional filings, to broaden exclusivity.
  • Monitoring patent challenges is essential to maintaining market advantage and planning subsequent innovation or licensing activities.

FAQs

1. How does Peru’s patent system handle biological or pharmaceutical inventions?
Peru grants patents for new chemical entities, formulations, and methods that are novel, non-obvious, and industrially applicable, aligning with TRIPS standards. However, patentability can be challenged based on prior art or inventive step issues, especially given the public health context.

2. What is the typical term of protection for drug patents in Peru?
Standard protection lasts 20 years from the filing date. Extensions or adjustments are not common unless permitted under specific circumstances, such as regulatory delays.

3. Can competitors challenge the validity of PE20160194?
Yes, through administrative or judicial procedures, challengers can submit prior art or argue lack of novelty or inventive step, potentially invalidating the patent.

4. How does patent landscape impact generic drug entry in Peru?
Strong, broad patents can delay generic entry, allowing patent holders to secure market exclusivity. Conversely, narrow or narrowly supported claims open opportunities for generics to design around or challenge the patent.

5. Is international patent protection advisable for drugs patented in Peru?
Yes. Filing via the PCT or regional routes enhances global coverage, protecting innovations in key markets and supporting licensing negotiations.


References

  1. INPP — Peruvian National Institute of Intellectual Property. Patent database and legal framework.
  2. TRIPS Agreement — World Trade Organization. Standards for patentability and enforcement.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). International Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  4. Peruvian Patent Law — Legislative Decree No. 1072.
  5. Global patent landscape reports — Clarivate, WIPO.

This analysis offers a comprehensive snapshot of patent PE20160194, guiding strategic and legal considerations in Peru’s pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.