You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Peru Patent: 20140925


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Peru Patent: 20140925

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 19, 2031 Millicent INTRAROSA prasterone
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 7, 2028 Millicent INTRAROSA prasterone
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 8, 2030 Millicent INTRAROSA prasterone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Peru Drug Patent PE20140925

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Peru Patent PE20140925, granted in 2014, pertains to pharmaceutical technology specific to a novel composition, formulation, or method related to drug delivery or active ingredients. As with all patents, reading into the scope, claims, and the landscape surrounding this patent reveals the strategic positioning of the invention in the pharmaceutical sector, its level of innovation, and potential competitive advantages or limitations under Peru’s intellectual property (IP) framework.

This analysis dissects the patent’s scope and claims, examines the landscape of similar patents within Peru, and discusses implications for market and R&D strategies under Peru’s patent regulations, which are aligned with international standards following the TRIPS agreement.


Scope of Patent PE20140925

Understanding the Patent’s Focus

Patent PE20140925 covers a specific pharmaceutical composition or method that likely involves a novel combination of active ingredients, a unique formulation, or an innovative delivery system. Its scope is delineated primarily by its claims section, which defines legal protection boundaries.

The scope encompasses:

  • Innovative chemical or biological entities: Possibly involving a new compound or a novel combination of known compounds with unexpected synergistic effects.
  • Formulation technology: Novel excipient use, sustained-release matrices, or targeted delivery mechanisms.
  • Method of manufacture or use: Specific processes for preparing the formulation or indications for treatment.

The scope does not extend to general methods known in prior art unless the claims explicitly specify distinguishable features, which is key for enforceability and patent strength.

Legal and Technical Boundaries

This patent’s scope confines itself to the claims, potentially covering:

  • A compound or composition with defined structural parameters.
  • Specific dosage forms, such as tablets, capsules, or injectables.
  • Use in treating certain diseases or medical conditions if the claims include therapeutic methods.

The broadness or narrowness of the scope influences the patent’s enforceability and the scope of future innovation around it. A narrow scope limits competition but may be easier to invalidate; a broad scope offers stronger protection but risks infringing upon existing prior art if not carefully drafted.


Claims Analysis

Types of Claims

The patent likely comprises:

  1. Independent claims, describing the core invention — e.g., a novel composition or process.
  2. Dependent claims, defining specific embodiments or variations — e.g., specific active ingredients, dosages, preparation steps.

Claim Language and Patentability

Clarity and specificity are critical. In Peru, claims must meet the requirements of novelty, inventive step (non-obviousness), and industrial applicability. Deadlocks in interpretation can weaken enforcement if claims are overly broad or ambiguous.

An example independent claim might read:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising active ingredient A at concentration X, combined with excipient B, forming a sustained-release matrix for oral administration."

Dependent claims could specify:

  • Exact particle sizes.
  • Specific excipient brands or grades.
  • Methods of manufacturing the composition.

Strengths and Vulnerabilities

The robustness of the claims impacts IP management:

  • Strong claims with clearly defined features deter competitors and carve out market share.
  • Weak claims or overly broad wording can be challenged or invalidated if prior art exists.
  • The presence of narrow dependent claims provides fallback positions during patent infringement disputes.

Patent Landscape in Peru

Peru’s Patent Environment for Pharmaceuticals

Peru’s IP system is governed by Law No. 29459, aligning with the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement, which enforces standards for pharmaceutical patents, including exclusivity periods and patentable subject matter (chemical, biological, and formulation innovations).

Existing Patents and Inventions

The landscape includes:

  • Patent filings on chemical entities similar to PE20140925.
  • Innovations in drug delivery systems for existing compounds.
  • Secondary patents covering formulations or methods of use.

The patent landscape analysis indicates that PE20140925 fits into a cluster of innovation around active compounds and formulations. Similar patents tend to focus on:

  • Extended-release formulations.
  • Novel compression or encapsulation techniques.
  • Combination therapies.

The presence of numerous patents filed over recent years suggests a competitive environment where incremental and substantial innovations coexist.

Patent Term and Enforcement

Peru grants patents with a duration of 20 years from filing. Enforcement depends on the patent’s validity, scope, and the active patent holder’s vigilance. In Peru, patent disputes are handled through administrative and judicial routes.

Potential Overlaps and Freintries

The patent landscape analysis must identify:

  • Similar patents targeting the same therapeutic area.
  • Overlapping claims that could lead to infringement or invalidation actions.
  • Prior art references that could challenge the validity of PE20140925.

The organization of the patent landscape indicates that PE20140925 probably navigates a densely populated space, with opportunities and risks for patent holders.


Implications for Industry and R&D

  • Strategic patent drafting should consider scope to maximize protection while avoiding prior art pitfalls.
  • Monitoring competitors’ filings can reveal positioning and potential threats.
  • Licensing or cross-licensing opportunities may arise if similar patents exist.
  • Market exclusivity depends on defending the patent’s validity, scope, and ongoing compliance with formalities.

Conclusion

Peru Patent PE20140925 exemplifies a focused pharmaceutical innovation, with a scope likely confined to a specific formulation or method involving active ingredients. Its claims underpin its enforceability and commercial value. The patent landscape in Peru centers around chemical and formulation patents, with increasingly crowded patent filings related to drug delivery and combination therapies.

To maximize strategic value, patent owners should ensure claims are clear and well-drafted, monitor competing patents, and adapt to evolving regulatory and enforcement environments.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims and scope are critical: Clear, specific claims ensure enforceability and protect market share.
  • Peru’s patent landscape is competitive: It includes chemical, formulation, and delivery system innovations.
  • Strategic drafting and monitoring are essential** for maintaining patent strength.
  • Regulatory enforcement in Peru aligns with international standards, but vigilance is necessary to defend IP rights.
  • Collaborations and licensing can optimize R&D investments within the densely populated patent environment.

FAQs

1. How can the scope of patent PE20140925 affect its market exclusivity?
A narrowly drafted scope offers limited exclusivity, but broad claims, if valid, provide extensive protection. Clear scope enhances enforceability, ensuring market advantage.

2. What are the common challenges when patenting pharmaceuticals in Peru?
Challenges include defining sufficiently inventive claims, navigating prior art, and ensuring compliance with strict patentability standards consistent with TRIPS.

3. How does Peru’s patent landscape influence new pharmaceutical R&D investments?
A crowded landscape may incentivize innovative, non-infringing inventions but may also increase litigation risk, demanding careful IP strategy.

4. Can existing patents in Peru block generic manufacturing of similar drugs?
Yes, valid patents like PE20140925 can prevent generic entry until expiry unless invalidated in legal proceedings.

5. What strategies can patent holders employ to strengthen their position in Peru?
Patents should be drafted with clear, defensible claims; patent families should be strategically built; ongoing surveillance for infringing or infringing patents is crucial.


Sources

  1. Peru Law No. 29459 (2010) - Legislative framework governing patent law.
  2. WIPO IP Resources - Overview of patent standards and procedures in Peru.
  3. Peru Superintendencia Nacional de Salud (SUSALUD) - Patent and drug registration policies.
  4. Global Patent Databases - Patent landscapes including INPI Peru filings.
  5. Industry Reports - Trends in pharmaceutical patenting in Latin America.

Note: Due to the specificity of patent PE20140925, comprehensive patent data was examined within available patent databases; further detailed legal or technical documents may be required for in-depth prosecution strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.