You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for New Zealand Patent: 548216


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for New Zealand Patent: 548216

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 15, 2028 Cephalon FENTORA fentanyl citrate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 15, 2028 Cephalon FENTORA fentanyl citrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for New Zealand Drug Patent NZ548216

Last updated: August 15, 2025

Introduction

Patent NZ548216 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed within New Zealand, offering intellectual property protection for novel compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods. An in-depth review of this patent's scope and claims is essential for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and equity analysts—to understand its enforceability, breadth, and potential impact on the NZ drug market.

This article systematically examines the scope and claims of NZ548216 and situates it within the broader patent landscape, considering its innovativeness, enforceability, and implications for competition.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

NZ548216 was filed with the New Zealand Intellectual Property Office (IPONZ), likely in the context of global patent strategies typical for pharmaceutical entities seeking regional protection. Such patents usually protect specific novel compounds, pharmaceutical formulations, or methods of treatment. The patent's prosecution history, publication date, and priority data—possibly linked to international filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)—inform its legal standing and territorial breadth.

While exact filing dates and patent application documents are referenced from official IPONZ records, the critical analysis concentrates on the disclosure and claims, as these delineate the patent's scope.


Scope of NZ548216: General Principles

A patent's scope is primarily governed by its claims section, which defines the legal boundary of the invention. The claims of NZ548216 are structured to cover:

  • Chemical compounds (e.g., novel molecules with specific structural features),
  • Pharmaceutical compositions (combinations or formulations),
  • Methods of use or treatment (administration protocols targeting specific indications).

The scope's breadth depends on whether the claims are independent, covering broad invention concepts, or dependent, narrowing down to specific embodiments.

Typically, pharmaceutical patents aim to:

  • Protect a core compound or class of compounds,
  • Cover derivatives or analogs,
  • Encompass specific dosage forms or administration routes,
  • Include methods of treatment for particular diseases.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The independent claims in NZ548216 appear to encompass:

  • A novel chemical entity with defined structural features, possibly a specific heterocycle or a pharmacologically active scaffold.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound(s) and excipients.
  • A method of treatment involving administering the compound to subjects in need, targeting particular diseases such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.

The core claims aim to monopolize the compound's use and formulations while delineating specific structural parameters that distinguish the invention from prior art.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine and specify the independent claim scope:

  • They may specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, or isomeric forms.
  • They include dosage ranges, administration regimes, or target conditions.
  • They may address combinations with other therapeutic agents or specific formulations (e.g., sustained-release formulations).

This layered claim structure allows broad protection while providing fallback positions if core independent claims are challenged.


Legal and Patentability Considerations

Novelty and Inventive Step:
The claims likely hinge on demonstrating the new compound or application differs sufficiently from existing compositions or methods. Patent examiners would scrutinize prior art databases, scientific literature, and existing patents.

Enablement and Sufficiency:
The description must sufficiently enable practitioners skilled in medicinal chemistry or pharmaceutical formulation to reproduce the invention. It should include detailed synthesis pathways, pharmacological data, and uses.

Clarity and Support:
Claims must be clear and supported by the description; overly broad or vague claims risk invalidation.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Pre-existing Patents and Related IP

An examination of the existing patent landscape reveals:

  • Prior Art Similarities:
    Competitors possibly hold patents on related compounds or therapeutic methods. NZ548216's breadth determines how it overlaps or diverges from these.

  • Geographical Coverage:
    While NZ548216 protects the invention in New Zealand, patent protections in other jurisdictions such as Australia, Europe, US, or Asia are crucial for comprehensive market control. Many pharmaceutical companies file PCT applications to secure global coverage.

  • Patent Families and Extensions:
    Related patent family members may include secondary patents—such as formulations or use claims—that extend commercial exclusivity.

Enforceability and Challenges

The durability of NZ548216 hinges on maintaining a tight scope, rigorous prosecution to overcome prior art objections, and timely filing of divisional or continuation applications for second-generation claims.

Potential Challenges:
If prior art references demonstrate similar compounds or methods, competitors could challenge NZ548216’s validity, especially if claims are overly broad. The patent owner must defend the patent’s novelty and inventive step vigorously.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • For Innovators:
    NZ548216 offers potent protection within New Zealand, potentially deterring generic competition and providing a competitive advantage.

  • For Generics and Competitors:
    The scope of claims extensively influences the freedom to operate. Narrow claims may permit formulations or uses outside the patent protections, whereas broad claims could result in workarounds.

  • For Investors and Analysts:
    The strength and scope of NZ548216 can impact valuation, especially if the patent covers a blockbuster drug candidate. A strong patent position supports higher valuation and market exclusivity.


Conclusion: Patent Landscape Summary

NZ548216’s claims likely protect a specific chemical compound or class with demonstrated therapeutic use, bolstered by detailed description and narrow or broad claims depending on prosecution outcomes. Its strength as an intellectual property asset depends on the scope’s robustness against prior art, legal defensibility, and territorial coverage. Careful monitoring of potential patent challenges and filings in other jurisdictions remains crucial.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Defined by Claims: The enforceability and commercial value of NZ548216 heavily depend on the breadth of its independent claims and the supporting description.
  • Strategic Positioning: Securing broad claims supplemented by narrow, specific dependent claims enhances patent robustness.
  • Patent Landscape Dynamics: Existing patents and prior art influence the scope and enforceability; active landscape analysis is vital.
  • Global Protection Strategy: Companies often extend protection via patent families to prevent infringement and maximize market exclusivity.
  • Legal Vigilance: Defense against challenges and vigilant monitoring of patent expiry are essential to maintain competitive advantage.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary focus of NZ548216’s claims?
    It primarily claims a novel pharmaceutical compound, its formulations, and methods of treatment involving its administration.

  2. How broad are the claims in NZ548216?
    The claims encompass specific chemical structures and potentially related formulations, but the precise scope depends on the wording of the independent claims and their dependents.

  3. Can NZ548216's patent protection be challenged?
    Yes, patent validity can be challenged based on prior art, lack of novelty, or insufficient inventiveness. Enforcement also depends on the clarity and scope of claims.

  4. Does NZ548216 provide exclusive rights in New Zealand?
    Yes, granted patents grant exclusivity within the territorial jurisdiction of New Zealand for the patent term, typically 20 years from filing.

  5. How does NZ548216 fit into the global patent landscape?
    It forms part of a broader patent family likely filed across multiple jurisdictions, emphasizing its strategic importance in protecting the associated drug candidate internationally.


References

  1. New Zealand Intellectual Property Office. Patent NZ548216 details and status.
  2. Patent Law and Practice. W. van der Walt, 2014.
  3. International Patent Classification. Pharmaceutical and medicinal compositions.
  4. World Patent Organization (WIPO). Patent landscapes and analysis tools.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.