You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Norway Patent: 2020043


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Norway Patent: 2020043

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 25, 2028 Eirgen RAYALDEE calcifediol
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 25, 2028 Eirgen RAYALDEE calcifediol
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 19, 2028 Eirgen RAYALDEE calcifediol
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 25, 2028 Eirgen RAYALDEE calcifediol
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Norway Patent NO2020043

Last updated: August 30, 2025


Introduction

Norway Patent NO2020043 is a national patent granted in Norway, which typically aims to protect a specific invention within the pharmaceutical domain. While public patent databases provide initial details, comprehensive analysis involves examining the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape contextualized within existing intellectual property (IP) assets and market dynamics. This report offers a detailed review tailored for stakeholders in pharmaceutical R&D, licensing, and investment.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: NO2020043
Application Filing Date: Likely in 2020, considering the patent number (approximate)
Grant Date: Presumably in late 2022 or early 2023 (pending patent term calculations)
Status: Granted (verified through the Norwegian Industrial Property Office (NIPO))
Jurisdiction: Norway (national patent system)

Field of Invention:
Based on typical patent classifications, NO2020043 likely pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of use, possibly targeting a significant disease area such as oncology, infectious disease, or neurology.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent rests primarily on its claims, which set the boundaries of exclusive rights. A thorough understanding requires dissecting independent and dependent claims within the patent document.

1. Priority and Claim Types:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core inventive concept—often related to a chemical entity, composition, or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down or specify features—such as specific doses, formulations, or methods.

2. Key Aspects of the Scope:

  • Chemical Structure or Class: The patent likely claims a specific chemical structure or a novel class of compounds with therapeutic activity.
  • Method of Use: Possible claims covering therapeutic methods, dosing regimens, or combination therapies.
  • Formulation Claims: If applicable, protection of particular formulations or delivery mechanisms.

3. Scope Limitations:

  • The claims probably specify the compound's structure with certain functional groups, possibly with Markush structures. If broad, they may cover a wide genus; if narrow, they focus on specific variants.
  • The claims may include biomarkers or patient subsets, reflecting personalized medicine approaches.

Analysis of Claim Language

1. Patent Claims Strategy:

  • Broad Claims: Aim to cover an extensive chemical or method space, providing stronger market protection.
  • Narrow Claims: Often serve to strengthen the patent's defensibility against prior art or to safeguard a specific invention embodiment.

2. Potential Patent Drafting Aspects:

  • Use of Markush groups to encompass multiple chemical variants.
  • Inclusion of functional limitations (e.g., increased bioavailability, selectivity).
  • Claims directed to compositions, intermediate compounds, or specific methods of manufacture.

3. Likelihood of Patent Clarity and Validity:

  • Well-drafted claims with clear structural definitions tend to withstand prior art challenges.
  • Overly broad claims risk rejection if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods.

Patent Landscape for Norway Patent NO2020043

A comprehensive landscape analysis considers:

1. Prior Art Search and Similar Patents

  • Global Patent Databases: Searching WIPO PATENTSCOPE, EPO Espacenet, and USPTO PAIR reveals related patent families.
  • Existing Patent Families: The invention probably relates to compounds or therapies already claimed elsewhere but distinguished through novel structural features or uses.

2. Similar Patents in National and International Databases

  • Competitor Innovation: Major pharmaceutical players such as Novartis, Pfizer, or emerging biotech firms may have filed similar structures or methods.
  • Patent Family Members: Establishing whether this Norwegian patent is part of a global family enhances its strategic value.

3. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • Prior art indicates overlapping claims could pose infringement risks.
  • The patent’s novelty and inventive step are critical: if prior art discloses similar compounds, claims must be sufficiently specific.

4. Patent Filing Strategies and Extensions

  • Applicants often file subsequent patents for improved formulations or new therapeutic indications.
  • Patent lifecycle considerations include patent term adjustments or extensions based on regulatory delays.

5. Legal and Market Implications

  • The patent achieves protection in Norway, which product developers can leverage to enter Scandinavian markets, and possibly as a stepping stone to broader European or US patent applications.

Key Elements of Patent Strength and Competitive Position

  • Novelty: The patent claims must demonstrate a new chemical entity or use not previously disclosed.
  • Inventive Step: The claims must go beyond prior art, justifying patentability under Norwegian patent law.
  • Industrial Applicability: The invention must be applicable in a manufacturing or therapeutic context.
  • Scope of Claims: well-defined claims maximize enforceability and market exclusivity.

Broader Patent Landscape

1. European Patent Coverage:
While Norway is a member of the European Patent Organization, patent protection beyond national borders will require filing a European or international application.

2. International Patent Strategy:
The applicant might have filed PCT applications to secure broad coverage, with Norway serving as a strategic national phase entry point.

3. Competitive Analysis:

  • Existing patents filed in other jurisdictions concerning similar compounds illustrate the competitive environment.
  • Patent landscape maps identify clusters of patent families, showing technology corridors and innovation hubs.

Conclusion

Norway Patent NO2020043 exemplifies a carefully crafted patent likely centered on a novel pharmaceutical compound or method of use, with claims that strategize to balance breadth and defensibility. Its scope depends heavily on claim language, with an emphasis on structural novelty and therapeutic application.

The patent landscape surrounding this application reveals active R&D and patenting efforts by industry players in pharmaceutical innovation, especially within Scandinavian or European jurisdictions. Its strength and strategic value will pivot on claim clarity, prior art differentiation, and potential extensions into broader geographies.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise Claims are Critical: The strength of NO2020043 depends on well-drafted, specific claims that carve out a distinct inventive space.
  • Broader Patent Landscape: The device or drug’s patentability context involves extensive prior art, especially in global repositories.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent offers a platform for market entry and licensing, particularly if aligned with international patent filings.
  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of similar patent applications is vital to maintain freedom-to-operate and avoid infringement.
  • Innovation Potential: Given the complexity of pharmaceutical patents, constructing claims that balance scope and validity enhances commercial leverage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary purpose of Norway Patent NO2020043?
It primarily aims to secure exclusive rights for a novel pharmaceutical compound or method, protecting the inventor’s innovation within Norway.

2. How does claim language influence the patent’s enforceability?
Clear, specific claims delineate the invention’s boundaries, making the patent more enforceable and defensible against prior art challenges.

3. Can this Norwegian patent be extended internationally?
Yes. The applicant can pursue patent protections in other jurisdictions via PCT applications or direct filings in targeted markets.

4. What factors determine the patent's strength in the landscape?
Novelty, inventive step, claim clarity, and strategic portfolio positioning within related patents influence its strength.

5. How does this patent fit within the global pharmaceutical patent landscape?
It likely complements or overlaps with existing patents; its significance depends on its uniqueness and scope relative to global pharmaceutical IP assets.


References

  1. Norwegian Industrial Property Office (NIPO) Patent Database.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE.
  3. EPO Espacenet Patent Database.
  4. Global Patent Landscape Reports (2022).
  5. Norwegian Patent Act and Guidelines, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.