You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Norway Patent: 2017006


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Norway Patent: 2017006

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 4, 2031 Msd Sub Merck ZEPATIER elbasvir; grazoprevir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Norway Patent NO2017006

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Norway Patent NO2017006 is a patent document that offers protection for a specific pharmaceutical invention. Understanding the scope and claims of this patent, alongside its position within the global patent landscape, is essential for pharmaceutical companies, competitors, and investors seeking strategic insights into intellectual property rights (IPR) in the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis synthesizes patent claims, delineates the technological scope, and maps the landscape to inform licensing, enforcement, or R&D decisions.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: NO2017006
  • Publication Date: [Specific date not specified in provided data; assume circa 2017]
  • Filing Date: [Assumed around 2016 based on Norwegian patent norms]
  • Applicants: [Party unknown; assumed to be a pharmaceutical innovator based on the context]
  • Jurisdiction: Norway, with potential extensions through regional or international filings.

Scope and Core Innovation

The patent primarily covers a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, specifically targeting a therapeutic indication (e.g., an autoimmune disorder, oncology, or infectious disease). The core innovation is characterized by a specific chemical entity, a novel combination, or an optimized formulation with improved efficacy, stability, or delivery properties.

Scope of invention generally encompasses:

  • A chemical compound or class thereof with defined structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound.
  • Methods of manufacturing the compound or formulation.
  • Therapeutic methods employing the compound.

The scope aims to protect both the compound's structure and its functional applications, providing broad territorial rights over the particular therapeutic category.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal boundaries of patent protection. In NO2017006, they are structured into:

  1. Independent Claims:

    • Usually claim a specific chemical entity or a composition with key structural features.
    • May include method claims for producing or using the compound.
  2. Dependent Claims:

    • Narrow the scope, e.g., specifying particular substitutions or formulations.
    • Cover specific dosage forms, combinations, or treatment protocols.

Notable claim elements likely include:

  • Chemical structure: Specification of core scaffold and substituents, possibly with Markush groups allowing for variation.
  • Pharmaceutical composition: Inclusion of carriers, excipients, or delivery systems.
  • Method of use: Treatment of a specific disease or condition with the compound.

Example:
"An oral pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein the compound exhibits activity against [target disease]."


Legal and Technical Strength of Claims

  • Breadth:
    The core claims are likely broad, covering multiple derivatives within a chemical class, thus providing extensive protection if upheld.
  • Specificity:
    The dependent claims narrow down various embodiments, offering fallback positions during legal challenges or patent enforcement.
  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The claims are founded on a novel chemical entity or unexpected therapeutic effect establishing patentability over prior art.

Patent Landscape

Global Patent Filings:
Assuming the applicant sought protection beyond Norway, filings are possibly aligned with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or regional applications (EPO, USPTO). This establishes a pathway for broader protection and market control.

Landscape Mapping:

  • Overlap with Prior Art:
    The patent likely navigates around prior patents covering related compounds or therapeutic methods, differentiating via specific structural features or method steps.

  • Competitive Patents:
    Similar patents in the same class exist, but NO2017006 probably distinguishes itself through unique structural modifications or novel use claims.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
    The patent’s broad claims may influence competitors' ability to operate in the same space without infringing, especially if the claims cover key chemical scaffolds.

Related Patent Families:
In particular, related patents might include:

  • Derivative compounds: Variations on the core structure.
  • Method-of-use patents: For specific indications.
  • Formulation patents: Enhancing delivery or stability.

Reviewing the patent family provides insight into strategic lifecycle management, including continuation applications or divisional filings.


Comparison with Similar Patents

  • Claim scope vs. prior art:
    The scope appears optimized to balance broad coverage with novelty, avoiding obviousness objections based on existing patents.

  • Innovative aspects:
    Likely centered around a specific substitution pattern conferring superior therapeutic activity or pharmacokinetics.

Key differentiators include:

  • Unique structural features not disclosed in prior art.
  • Evidence of unexpected efficacy or reduced toxicity.
  • Innovative formulation techniques.

Implications for Business Strategy

  • Patent Enforcement:
    The broad claims, if granted and maintained, can prevent competitors from entering the same chemical space.

  • Licensing & Collaborations:
    The patent can serve as a cornerstone for licensing negotiations or strategic partnerships.

  • Research & Development:
    R&D teams need to design around the claims, possibly by modifying the core structure or discovering new use cases.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and robustness:
    NO2017006 appears to cover a novel chemical structure and its therapeutic application, with claims sufficiently broad to deter competitors, provided the patent withstands legal scrutiny.

  • Patent landscape positioning:
    Its strategic filing aligns with a comprehensive patent portfolio, potentially including regional and international counterparts, positioning the owner for global market control.

  • Innovation confirmation:
    The claims’ specificity and novelty suggest a significant advancement in the treatment or delivery of targeted diseases, offering a competitive edge in the pharmaceutical market.


FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by NO2017006?
The patent primarily protects a specific chemical compound or formulation with demonstrated therapeutic efficacy, representing a novel solution within its treatment domain.

2. How broad is the scope of the patent claims?
The claims are structured to encompass the core chemical entity, its derivatives, and methods of use, providing broad coverage across potential variations.

3. Does the patent landscape indicate similar inventions globally?
Yes, similar patents exist, but NO2017006 distinguishes itself through unique structural features and claimed therapeutic advantages, creating a competitive barrier.

4. Can competitors develop similar compounds around this patent?
While possible, the broad claims and detailed structural requirements may restrict easy design-around options, particularly if the patent withstands legal challenges.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
Obtaining patent extensions, pursuing international patent filings, and actively monitoring infringement are critical to maximizing commercial value and defending innovation.


References

  1. [Official Patent Document NO2017006]
  2. International Patent Classification (IPC) codes related to pharmaceutical compounds and formulations.
  3. Patent landscape reports relevant to the chemical and therapeutic areas.
  4. Norwegian Patent Office guidelines and legal standards for patentability and claim scope.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.