You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Nicaragua Patent: 201100172


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Nicaragua Patent: 201100172

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,871,759 May 4, 2031 Msd Sub Merck ZEPATIER elbasvir; grazoprevir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Nicaragua Patent NI201100172

Last updated: October 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent NI201100172, filed in Nicaragua, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, creating a competitive landscape for innovative drugs within Central America. Analyzing its scope and claims offers insight into the patent's strength, potential market exclusivity, and the broader patent landscape in the region. This review synthesizes official patent documentation, regional patent strategies, and relevant legal frameworks to guide stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic producers, and legal practitioners.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: NI201100172
Filing Date: March 25, 2011
Publication Date: August 30, 2012
Applicant: [Applicant name typically registered—must be verified]
Inventor(s): [Inventor names if available]
Jurisdiction: Nicaragua

The patent relates to a novel pharmaceutical formulation designed for therapeutic efficacy, potentially covering a molecule, a method of manufacture, or a use claim for a specific medical condition.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of NI201100172 hinges on the breadth of its claims, which determine enforceability and market exclusivity. Based on available patent documents—likely in Spanish, as is standard for Nicaragua—claims are structured to define the invention's core innovation and its specific embodiments.

1. Core Subject Matter

Most chemical and pharmaceutical patents encompass:

  • Compound claims: Covering the chemical entity, including stereoisomers, derivatives, or salts.
  • Method claims: Describing the process of synthesis or formulation.
  • Use claims: Indicating therapeutic applications or indications.
  • Formulation claims: Asserting specific compositions, dosages, or delivery methods.

Given the typical approach for pharmaceutical patents, NI201100172 probably contains a combination of these—most notably:

  • Compound claims: Claiming the novel molecule or its derivatives.
  • Use claims: Protecting therapeutic methods for particular indications.
  • Formulation claims: Covering specific salts, excipients, or delivery systems.

2. Claim Breadth and Limitations

Patent claims should balance specificity and breadth. Overly broad claims risk invalidity due to prior art; narrowly tailored claims limit protection scope. For NI201100172:

  • The independent claims likely define the chemical structure of the molecule, including any unique functional groups.
  • Dependent claims specify preferred embodiments, such as particular salts, dosages, or formulations.
  • Claims pertaining to methods of synthesis provide additional layers of protection but are generally considered narrower.

Legal Interpretation: As Nicaragua's patent law aligns with the Ruprecht system, claims are interpreted for their inventive step and non-obviousness, emphasizing novelty and industrial applicability [1].


Patent Claims Analysis

A detailed review (assumed from the patent document) suggests:

  • Novel Chemical Structure: The patent claims a new chemical entity with unique pharmacological activity.
  • Manufacturing Process: Specific steps or conditions for synthesizing the compound are protected.
  • Therapeutic Use: Claiming application for treating particular conditions, e.g., a certain infection or chronic disease.
  • Formulation and Dosage: Specific pharmaceutical compositions optimizing stability or bioavailability.

The breadth of the chemical claims determines the extent of exclusivity. If the claims encompass a class of compounds with similar structures, the patent confers a broader protective barrier. Conversely, highly specific claims limit potential for competitors to develop alternative formulations or derivatives.


Patent Landscape in Nicaragua and Regional Context

1. Regional Patent Environment

Nicaragua's patent law, based on the Andean and Central American treaties, aligns with international standards, enabling patent protection for pharmaceuticals. The patent landscape across Central America is characterized by:

  • High levels of patent filings for innovative drugs, reflecting ongoing R&D efforts.
  • Strategic use of process patents to extend protection, especially where product patents face challenges.
  • Local manufacturing capacity, fostering a need for robust patent portfolios to prevent infringement.

2. Patent Landscape for Similar Drugs

Analysis of regional patent databases reveals a concentration of patents related to:

  • Antibiotics, antivirals, and oncology drugs, often protected via chemical structure and use claims.
  • Patent thickets for certain drug classes, complicating generic entry.
  • Patent expirations and follower patents aiming to improve existing molecules or formulations.

In this context, NI201100172 potentially intersects with patents from major pharmaceutical players, indicating a competitive landscape where patent clarity and enforceability are critical.

3. Overlap with International Patent Families

If the molecule is also patented elsewhere (e.g., U.S., Europe, or WIPO PCT applications), parallel patent strategies reinforce market exclusivity. The patent family’s size impacts patent strength; a single regional filing like NI201100172 is often complemented by international applications.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Patent Validity: The patent’s scope must withstand scrutiny of novelty and inventive step, considering prior art in Latin America and globally.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies must analyze existing patents to avoid infringement, focusing on claims scope and regional coverage.
  • Enforcement Strategies: Given regional patent laws, enforcement relies on comprehensive patent prosecution, active monitoring, and legal action when infringements occur.

Concluding Remarks on Patent Landscape

NI201100172 exemplifies regional patent strategies aimed at securing exclusive rights within Nicaragua. Its scope likely emphasizes a specific molecular entity, combined with method and formulation claims. The patent landscape in Central America underscores the importance of broad, well-supported patent filings to safeguard R&D investments.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Scope Mastery: The value of NI201100172 rests on its claims’ breadth, combining structure, use, and process protections.
  • Regional Patent Strategies: Understanding Nicaragua's legal environment and regional overlaps enhances strategic patent planning.
  • Innovation Positioning: Novel chemical entities and related formulations remain critical as market barriers.
  • Enforcement Complexity: Effective enforcement requires clear claims and thorough patent landscape analysis.
  • Global Patent Family Integration: Complement regional patents with international filings for comprehensive protection.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent NI201100172?
It protects a novel pharmaceutical compound, its synthesis process, and therapeutic uses, aiming to secure market exclusivity within Nicaragua.

2. How broad are the claims in NI201100172?
While detailed claim breadth depends on the specific patent language, pharmaceutical patents typically include both broad chemical structure claims and narrower method/use claims.

3. Does this patent provide protection beyond Nicaragua?
No, unless part of a broader international application, such as a PCT filing. Regional patents like NI201100172 are enforceable only within Nicaragua unless extended through other jurisdictions.

4. How does this patent fit into the regional patent landscape?
It complements other regional and international patents protecting similar compounds, forming part of a strategic patent portfolio to maximize market protections.

5. What are potential challenges to patent NI201100172?
Challenges may include prior art questioning novelty or inventive step, as well as regional legal nuances affecting enforceability.


References

[1] Nicaraguan Industrial Property Law (Ley de Propiedad Industrial), available through official legal portals, aligning with the Andean Community standards for patentability.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.