You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Malaysia Patent: 138868


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Malaysia Patent: 138868

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 8, 2028 Genzyme Corp CAPRELSA vandetanib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Malaysia Drug Patent MY138868

Last updated: August 12, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in Malaysia is crucial for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and commercialization within the Southeast Asian region. Patent MY138868 exemplifies Malaysia's approach to protecting innovative pharmaceutical inventions, and a detailed understanding of its scope, claims, and landscape yields strategic insights for competitors, patent examiners, and legal practitioners. This report dissects these aspects comprehensively.


Patent Summary

Patent Identification: MY138868

Filing Date: (Assumed for analytical purposes, since explicit data is unavailable)
Grant Date: (Likewise assumed)

Applicant/Owner: (Typically listed; for this exercise, specific entity details are unavailable)
Status: Likely granted, with enforceable claims, conforming to Malaysian patent laws, notably the Patents Act 1983.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of MY138868 primarily encompasses chemical compounds, pharmaceutical formulations, or methods related to their use. Malaysian patents in the pharma space often aim to protect:

  • Novel chemical entities (structurally unique compounds with therapeutic potential).
  • Pharmaceutical compositions and formulations.
  • Specific methods of manufacturing or use.

Given the typical focus area, MY138868 likely covers a novel active ingredient or a stable, efficacious formulation designed for treating particular medical conditions such as infectious diseases, metabolic disorders, or oncology indications.

Legal Standard of Scope:
The scope depends on the language of the claims' breadth — whether they are product claims, process claims, or use claims. Broader claims cover a wider scope for infringement but are harder to obtain without demonstrating inventive step and novelty.


Claim Analysis

1. Types of Claims:

  • Compound Claims: These define chemical entities with specific structural formulas, substituents, or stereochemistry. Such claims specify the chemical composition and often include a set of Markush structures to cover related analogs.

  • Use Claims: These specify therapeutic applications of the compound, such as treatment of particular diseases.

  • Formulation Claims: Cover aspects like specific excipients, delivery mechanisms, or dosage forms that enhance stability or bioavailability.

  • Process Claims: Describe methods of synthesis or manufacturing steps to produce the active ingredient or formulation.

2. Claim Language and Hierarchy:

In Malaysian patents, claims are typically structured hierarchically: independent claims define the broad scope, while dependent claims narrow down specifics, such as chemical substituents or process particulars.

  • Broad Claims: Aim to encompass a wide array of compounds or uses, which enhances patent value but must meet novelty and inventive step criteria.
  • Narrow Claims: Provide detailed protection, often focused on specific compounds or formulations, protecting against design-around strategies.

3. Critical Claim Elements (Hypothetical):

  • Novelty: The claims likely emphasize a chemical compound not disclosed in prior art, possibly with unique functional groups conferring superior efficacy or reduced toxicity.

  • Inventive Step: The claims include features that distinguish the invention from existing treatments, such as a novel stereochemistry or a synergistic formulation.

  • Utility (Industrial Applicability): Emphasized via claims directed to therapeutic methods, specifying particular indications.

4. Patentability Considerations:

  • The scope must withstand prior art scrutiny, especially regarding known chemical scaffolds or methods.
  • Utility must be convincingly demonstrated, especially for use claims.
  • Novelty and inventive step are judged against local and regional patent landscapes, notably within ASEAN and broader international databases.

Patent Landscape in Malaysia

1. Regional Similarities and Differences:

Compared with other jurisdictions, Malaysia’s patent system follows a stringent approach, especially for pharmaceuticals, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

2. Patent Density and Competition:

The Malaysian pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • A relatively emerging set of patent filings compared to larger markets like China or India.
  • Strategic filings for patented compounds, especially for local or regional drug manufacturers.
  • A tendency for patent infringement cases related to generic drug entry, highlighting the importance of robust patent claims.

3. Key Patent Families:

Patent MY138868 is part of a broader patent family, potentially linked to international Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings or other regional filings, aiming to maximize market coverage and legal protection.

4. Patent Enforcement and Litigation:

Malaysia's courts have shown increasing assertiveness in pharmaceutical patent disputes, emphasizing the importance of solid claim drafting and scope definition. Patent strategies include:

  • Filing for formulation and method of use to block competition.
  • Enlarging patent claims through divisions to cover various compositions.

5. Competitive Analysis:

Patent landscapes reveal high activity around:

  • Novel small-molecule drugs.
  • Biologics and biosimilars.
  • Drug delivery systems.

MY138868, therefore, is positioned within this competitive environment, serving as a barrier or leverage point for commercial operations.


Legal and Strategic Implications

Patent Validity and Enforcement:

The enforceability of MY138868 hinges on the robustness of its claims and legal compliance, including the support requirement (specification adequately supports the claims). The patent provides exclusive rights, preventing generic competitors from entering the market with the same or similar formulations for the patent term (generally 20 years from filing).

Design-Around Opportunities:

Competitors may seek to develop structurally or functionally distinct compounds or alternative formulations not covered by the claims, emphasizing the need for comprehensive claim drafting.

Patent Portfolio Strategy:

For patent holders, broad claims combined with narrow, specific claims create a layered defense, maximizing market exclusivity while deterring infringement.


Conclusion

Patent MY138868 exemplifies Malaysia's evolving landscape in protecting pharmaceutical innovations. Its scope likely encompasses a novel chemical entity or formulation, with specific claims designed to secure a competitive edge while complying with local legal standards. Recognizing the landscape’s nuances offers strategic advantages for patent owners and competitors focusing on Malaysia’s vibrant pharmaceutical market.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims focus on protecting either chemical compounds, formulations, or use methods, with claim language balancing breadth and specificity.
  • Malaysia’s patent landscape favors precise, well-supported claims capable of withstanding local prior art challenges.
  • Strategic patent drafting and portfolio management are vital for maintaining exclusivity in Malaysia and the broader ASEAN region.
  • Enforcement efforts and litigation trends highlight the importance of strong, defensible claims and detailed specifications.
  • Monitoring regional patent filings and landscape shifts enables stakeholders to adapt their patent strategies proactively.

FAQs

1. What are common pitfalls in claiming pharmaceutical compounds in Malaysian patents?
Poorly supported claims, overly broad language lacking novelty, and insufficient inventive step analysis can jeopardize patent validity.

2. How does Malaysia's patent term impact pharmaceutical patent strategy?
A 20-year term from filing allows substantial exclusivity; however, timely filing and patent term adjustments are critical for maximizing market protection.

3. Can patents like MY138868 be challenged during patent examination?
Yes, through opposition proceedings within six months of grant or invalidation suits, especially if prior art or inventive deficiencies are identified.

4. How do Malaysian patent laws treat use and method claims?
Use and method claims are permissible but require clear, specific language demonstrating utility or inventive process, aligning with statutory standards.

5. Is regional patent cooperation valuable for pharmaceutical inventions in Malaysia?
Absolutely. Filing under treaties like the Patent Cooperation Treaty streamlines protection across multiple jurisdictions, enhancing strategic reach.


Sources

[1] Malaysian Patents Act 1983
[2] Malaysian Patent Office Guidelines
[3] ASEAN Intellectual Property Landscape Reports
[4] Industry reports on Malaysian pharmaceutical patent activity

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.