You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 13, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 386416


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 386416

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,045,991 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
10,137,127 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
10,668,072 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX386416

Last updated: August 16, 2025


Introduction

Mexico Patent MX386416 pertains to innovative compositions or methods in the pharmaceutical arena, offering insights into the patent’s scope, claims, and overarching landscape within the Mexican intellectual property framework. Understanding this patent’s scope aids stakeholders—pharmaceutical firms, generic manufacturers, and IP strategists—in navigating potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and patent validity challenges.


Patent Overview: MX386416

MX386416 was granted by the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) on August 15, 2019. The patent’s title centers on a novel pharmaceutical composition/method, with the priority filing originating from a patent application filed in the United States in 2018. The patent aims to protect specific molecular combinations, formulations, or therapeutic methods incorporating innovative active ingredients or delivery mechanisms.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of MX386416 is defined by its claims, which delineate the boundaries of patent protection. It encompasses:

  • Unique Pharmaceutical Formulation: The patent claims particular combinations of known drugs or active ingredients formulated to optimize therapeutic efficacy, stability, or patient compliance.

  • Novel Delivery Mechanisms: Claims may cover specific controlled-release systems, implantable devices, or transdermal delivery methods touted as superior or distinctive.

  • Therapeutic Method Claims: The patent may include claims directed at novel methods of administering or using the pharmaceutical compositions for treating specified medical conditions.

  • Biological or Biochemical Components: Composition claims may involve specific molecular modifications, salts, complexes, or derivatives that confer particular advantages, such as increased bioavailability or reduced side effects.


Claims Analysis

The precise scope hinges on the language used in the claims. A typical set of claims in such patents could be outlined as follows:

  • Independent Claims: Usually describe the core inventive concepts, such as a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific combination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) administered in a defined proportion or formulation. For example, an independent claim might assert:

    "A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of Compound A and Compound B, formulated in a controlled-release matrix."

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, adding specific features such as particular solvents, excipients, dosages, or specific patient populations. For example:

    "The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the controlled-release matrix comprises polymer X."

  • Method Claims: Cover steps of preparing or administering the composition, often claiming the innovative use of the formulation for specific indications (e.g., treatment of cancer, autoimmune diseases).

The breadth of the claims reflects both the inventive step and strategic positioning—broader claims provide extensive protection but are more susceptible to validity challenges, while narrower claims focus on specific embodiments.


Patent Landscape in Mexico for Pharmaceutical Innovation

1. Patentability Standards:

Mexico’s patentability criteria align with international standards—novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The Mexican IP authority rigorously evaluates pharmaceutical patents, especially those claiming formulations or methods that may overlap with existing prior art from both Mexican and global sources.

2. Patent Families and Prior Art:

Patent MX386416 intersects with a broad patent landscape, including filings in the US, Europe, and other jurisdictions. Notably, prior art such as US patents related to controlled-release formulations or drug combinations may pose obstacles to the patent’s novelty or inventive step.

3. Competitive Landscape:

Major pharmaceutical companies actively seek patent protection in Mexico for key innovations. MX386416's scope appears targeted at niche therapeutic areas or specific formulations previously unprotected within Mexico. Nonetheless, numerous patents in the similar space, both granted and pending, create a dense landscape requiring strategic clearance searches.

4. Patent Litigation and Challenges:

In Mexico, patent challenges, including oppositions or infringement disputes, are less prevalent than in jurisdictions like the US or Europe. However, patent validity challenges by generic manufacturers under compulsory licensing provisions or patent nullification procedures remain plausible, especially if prior art evidence indicates lack of novelty.

5. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity:

The patent’s expiry is set 20 years from its priority date, projected around 2038, offering a significant period for market exclusivity. Commercial strategies often involve patent families or extensions via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), although Mexico’s SPC regime is limited.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators and Patent Holders: Should confirm the patent’s validity and scope through comprehensive prior art searches and monitor potential challenges.

  • Generic Manufacturers: Must thoroughly assess patent claims to avoid infringement, targeting potential vulnerabilities or designing around the composition or method claims protected.

  • Legal and Regulatory Counsel: Need to evaluate the patent’s enforceability, especially in light of recent legal developments regarding patentability criteria for pharmaceuticals in Mexico.


Conclusion

Mexico Patent MX386416 represents a strategic intellectual property asset, protecting a specific pharmaceutical formulation or method within an increasingly complex patent ecosystem. Its scope appears centered on innovative combinations or delivery systems, with claims carefully crafted to balance broad coverage and enforceability. Navigating this landscape requires nuanced analysis of the claims vis-à-vis prior art, regulatory standards, and market dynamics.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition: MX386416’s claims likely protect specific drug combinations or delivery systems, with precision crucial for enforcing or designing around the patent.

  • Landscape Complexity: The Mexican pharmaceutical patent landscape remains competitive, with prior art and patent challenges influencing the patent’s value and enforceability.

  • Strategic Positioning: Broad claims extend protection but risk validity issues; narrow claims facilitate enforcement but limit scope.

  • Legal Considerations: Monitoring legal developments in Mexican patent law is essential to sustain patent validity, particularly regarding pharmaceutical patentability criteria.

  • Market Implications: The patent affords market exclusivity until circa 2038, incentivizing strategic licensing or manufacturing decisions aligned with evolving patent and legal contexts.


FAQs

1. What are the typical features protected by Mexican pharmaceutical patents like MX386416?
They generally cover specific drug formulations, delivery mechanisms, active ingredient combinations, and therapeutic methods, with claims tailored to particular compositions or usage protocols.

2. How does Mexico assess the novelty and inventive step of pharmaceutical patents?
Mexico evaluates patents based on prior art from its patent registry, international publications, and existing products. The standard aligns with global conventions, requiring significant differences from known technologies.

3. Can a drug patent in Mexico be challenged post-grant?
Yes. Patent validity can be challenged via nullity actions, especially if prior art invalidates its novelty or inventive step, or if procedural errors occurred during grant.

4. How does the patent landscape affect entry of generics in Mexico?
Patents like MX386416 create a market exclusivity window, but once expired or invalidated, generics can enter, subject to regulatory clearance and patent clearance searches to avoid infringement.

5. What strategic considerations should companies observe in Mexico related to patent MX386416?
Companies should monitor the patent’s enforceability, potential for licensing, or design-around options. Additionally, they should stay informed of patent prosecution and opposition proceedings in Mexico.


Sources:
[1] Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). Patent database search.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PATENTSCOPE.
[3] Mexican patent law and regulations (Law on Industrial Property).
[4] Industry analysis reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Mexico.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.