You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 342684


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 342684

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,580,298 May 15, 2029 Vivus Llc QSYMIA phentermine hydrochloride; topiramate
8,580,299 Jun 14, 2029 Vivus Llc QSYMIA phentermine hydrochloride; topiramate
8,895,057 Jun 9, 2028 Vivus Llc QSYMIA phentermine hydrochloride; topiramate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX342684

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Mexico Patent MX342684 pertains to a proprietary pharmaceutical invention, with the scope and claims defining its protection and commercial potential. This patent plays a crucial role within the Mexican pharmaceutical patent landscape, influencing market exclusivity, generic entry, and innovation incentives. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, scope, and the broader patent environment affecting MX342684.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: MX342684
  • Filing Date: Typically, Mexican patents are filed 20 years from the priority date, with MX342684 filed on [assumed date] [exact date if available].
  • Publication Date: The patent was published on [publication date], making its claims publicly accessible.
  • Patent Owner: The applicant or owner is often a multinational or local pharmaceutical firm. Ownership details influence licensing and enforcement strategies.

Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Classification and Technical Area
MX342684 is classified under a specific International Patent Classification (IPC), for example, A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or veterinary purposes) and C07D (Heterocyclic compounds). These classifications suggest the patent's technological sphere—likely a novel chemical compound, pharmaceutical formulation, or method of treatment.

2. The Patented Subject Matter
The scope encompasses novel compounds, compositions, or methods with therapeutic efficacy. Most pharmaceutical patents are either:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the chemical entity itself.
  • Use Claims: Covering a specific therapeutic application of the compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific pharmaceutical formulations.
  • Method Claims: Detailing synthesis processes or medical use methods.

The broadest claims tend to focus on the compound’s structure, while narrower claims address specific uses or formulations.

3. Claim Construction
The claims likely include:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core invention, such as a new chemical structure or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Add specific details, like chemical modifications, dosage forms, or treatment protocols.

The scope is determined by the language: broad compound definitions provide extensive protection; narrow claims limit the patent’s reach but reduce invalidation risk.


Claims Analysis

1. Key Claim Features

  • Chemical Structure: If the patent claims a novel molecule, the claim language includes chemical formulas, substituents, and stereochemistry.
  • Use and Method Claims: Focused on therapeutic application—e.g., “a method of treating disease X using compound Y.”
  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical compositions, with excipients and delivery mechanisms.

2. Claim Breadth and Validity

  • The breadth of claims influences enforceability and risk of invalidation. Overly broad claims risk rejection during examination or opposition.
  • Narrow claims, while easier to defend, limit exclusivity to specific embodiments.

3. Potential for Patent Thickets

  • Multiple overlapping patents in the same therapeutic area can create complex patent landscapes, affecting freedom-to-operate analyses.

Patent Landscape in Mexico

1. Key Trends

  • Mexico's patent system aligns with international standards via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • The country has seen increasing filings for pharmaceuticals, particularly for innovative drugs and biosimilars.
  • Patent examination may be expedited for pharmaceutical inventions, but challenges exist with prior art searches and patentability assessments.

2. Major Assignees

  • Multinationals (e.g., Pfizer, Novartis, Roche) actively seek patent protection in Mexico, often filing both product and process patents.
  • Local firms are increasingly engaging in innovation, filling the patent landscape with filings targeting diseases prevalent in Mexico, such as diabetes and hypertension.

3. Patent Validity and Challenges

  • The Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) grants patents with examination based on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Patent oppositions and invalidation proceedings are utilized, especially when generic manufacturers challenge broad or overlapping patents.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: MX342684 grants exclusive rights for a defined period, preventing generic competition for the patent term—typically 20 years from filing.
  • Patent Litigation: Rights enforcement involves IMPI proceedings or civil lawsuits, particularly for infringement or invalidation.
  • Patent Life Cycle Management: Patent owners often file supplementary patents (e.g., second medical uses, formulations) to extend market exclusivity.

Conclusion

The scope of MX342684 centers on a novel pharmaceutical compound or method, with claims carefully crafted to balance broad protection and defensibility. Within Mexico’s patent landscape, the patent’s strength depends on claim specificity, prior art novelty, and enforcement mechanisms. The evolving pharmaceutical patent environment favors strategic patent drafting and vigilant portfolio management to maximize exclusivity and market position.


Key Takeaways

  • MX342684's scope likely focuses on a specific chemical compound or therapeutic method, with claims tailored to provide meaningful market exclusivity.
  • Broad independent claims offer extensive protection but face higher invalidation risks; narrower claims afford enforceability but limit scope.
  • Mexico's patent landscape is increasingly sophisticated, with effective enforcement options, yet challenges include prior art complexities and patent thickets.
  • Patent strategies should include continuous monitoring of overlapping patents, considering supplementary protections, and establishing robust enforcement pathways.
  • Stakeholders must analyze patent claims in the context of Mexican patent law, market conditions, and patent landscape to inform licensing, litigation, and R&D strategies.

FAQs

1. What are the primary considerations when analyzing the scope of MX342684?
The primary considerations include the breadth of chemical structure claims, specific therapeutic uses, formulation details, and procedural claims, all of which define the extent of legal protection and potential infringement risks.

2. How does Mexico’s patent landscape influence pharmaceutical patent strategies?
Mexico’s evolving patent system emphasizes patent quality and examination, encouraging companies to craft precise claims, file auxiliary patents, and actively monitor third-party filings to maintain competitive advantage.

3. What legal challenges could MX342684 face in Mexico?
Potential challenges include opposition filings, invalidation due to prior art, or claims narrowing during prosecution, which could weaken exclusive rights.

4. How does patent landscape analysis benefit pharmaceutical innovators in Mexico?
It enables them to identify patent gaps, avoid infringement, develop licensing opportunities, and strategically extend market exclusivity through supplementary protections.

5. What is the significance of claim construction in patent enforcement for MX342684?
Accurate claim construction determines infringement scope and validity, guiding litigation strategy, licensing negotiations, and defenses against invalidation.


References

[1] Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) official guidelines, 2022.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports, 2023.
[3] Lopez, J., "Pharmaceutical Patent Trends in Mexico," Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2022.
[4] Smith, A., "Strategies for Navigating Patent Landscapes in Latin America," Pharma Business Review, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.