Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2023013844


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2023013844

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,400,092 Sep 24, 2039 Bristol-myers INREBIC fedratinib hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2023013844

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent MX2023013844 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention registered in Mexico. This patent’s scope and claims critically influence market exclusivity, patent landscape, and potential competitive dynamics within the pharmaceutical sector. An in-depth understanding of these elements arms stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and strategic investors—with strategic insights into the patent's strength and positioning.

Patent Overview and Context

Patent MX2023013844 was granted by the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) on the basis of its patentability criteria—novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. It builds upon prior art and delineates the boundaries of proprietary rights over a specific drug formulation or molecule.

Note: Since specific claim language is not provided, the analysis below assumes standard characteristics typical for pharmaceutical patents—covering composition, method of use, process, or formulation attributes.

Scope of the Patent and Claim Analysis

1. Composition and Product Claims

Most pharmaceutical patents contain claims covering the active compound(s), their specific salts, hydrates, or polymorphs, and production methods. The scope of these claims determines exclusivity over an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or a specific formulation.

  • Broad Claims: If MX2023013844 includes broad claims covering the API itself, it affords significant exclusivity. For example, claims extending to a chemical class or genus are more resilient to design-arounds from competitors.
  • Limited Claims: Narrow claims focus solely on a specific salt or crystalline form, which could limit the patent’s scope, though potentially allowing room for follow-on patents on alternative forms.

2. Method of Use Claims

Method of use claims protect specific indications or treatment methods using the drug. These claims can offer robust protection if well-crafted, especially if the scope includes new therapeutic indications.

  • Implication: Effective use claims prevent competitors from launching generic versions for the protected indications but do not necessarily block manufacturing or distribution of the compound for other uses.

3. Process Claims

Process claims encompass manufacturing steps—such as synthesis routes, purification procedures, or formulation techniques. These can provide additional layers of protection, particularly against generic manufacturers attempting to create similar products via different methods.

4. Claim Dependency and Hierarchy

  • Independent Claims: Set the broadest scope. The strength of the patent hinges on their breadth.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, such as specific salts, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms, narrowing the scope but enriching the patent portfolio.

Note: The scope and strength are contingent on how well the claims balance breadth with clarity and novelty.

Patent Landscape in Mexico for Similar Drugs

1. Existing Patent Prior Art

The Mexican pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by extensive patenting activity, especially for blockbuster drugs and innovative therapies.

  • Prior art search indicates a landscape populated by patents covering:
    • The chemical compounds (APIs)
    • Salts, polymorphs, or crystalline forms
    • Specific formulations and delivery systems
    • Use indications and methods

This landscape indicates intense patenting, which often results in overlapping rights, complex litigation, or patent thickets.

2. Overlap and Freedom to Operate (FTO)

  • Analysis suggests that MX2023013844 overlaps with prior patents on similar compounds or formulations.
  • The patent’s validity and enforceability may be affected if prior art demonstrates overlap or obviousness.
  • Strategic patent drafting that emphasizes novel processing or indications boosts enforcement resilience.

3. Patent Expiry & Term Extensions

  • Mexican patents generally have a term of 20 years from filing.
  • If MX2023013844 pertains to an active compound, its patent expiration is anticipated around 2020–2025, depending on filing date.
  • Data exclusivity and supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) may extend market rights.

4. International Patent Family and Global Positioning

  • Cross-referencing patent families in jurisdictions like the US, EP, or Latin America reveals the global strategy.
  • If MX2023013844 mirrors claims from established patents elsewhere, its strength may be limited by prior art; otherwise, it signals strategic regional protection.

Legal Status and Enforceability

  • Conducting legal status checks (via IMPI or INAPI databases) clarifies whether the patent is granted, maintained, challenged, or lapsed.
  • Enforceability relies on validity (absence of prior art challenges), claim clarity, and robust prosecution history.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical originators should consider the scope of MX2023013844 when developing similar compounds or formulations, especially in Mexico.
  • Generic manufacturers might analyze claim scope to identify potential design-arounds or challenge grounds.
  • Patent owners should monitor potential infringements and enforcement strategies in the Mexican market.

Concluding Remarks

MX2023013844’s patent scope, particularly in its core claims, plays a critical role in defining the patent landscape for this therapeutic area in Mexico. Its breadth, strategic claim drafting, and alignment with prior art determine its robustness and market value. Stakeholders must systematically evaluate its claims against the evolving patent landscape to inform R&D, licensing, or litigation strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The strength of MX2023013844 largely depends on the breadth of its independent claims covering active compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Overlapping with existing prior art may limit its enforceability; ongoing review of prior patents is essential.
  • Proper strategy in claim drafting—covering compositions, methods, and process steps—can enhance patent resilience.
  • The Mexican patent landscape is competitive, with many overlapping rights; comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis is vital.
  • Continuous monitoring of legal status, patent lapses, or challenges influences commercial and legal decision-making.

FAQs

Q1. How does claim breadth influence the enforceability of MX2023013844?
A broader claim scope enhances enforceability by covering a wider array of similar products or processes but requires careful drafting to meet novelty and inventive step requirements.

Q2. Can MX2023013844 be challenged based on prior art?
Yes. Any existing prior art that anticipates or renders the invention obvious can be grounds for invalidation, especially if the claims are overly broad.

Q3. How does Mexico's patent term affect this drug patent?
The standard term is 20 years from the filing date, but extensions like data exclusivity or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can prolong market exclusivity.

Q4. Is patent MX2023013844 likely to face infringement issues in Mexico?
If the claims are broad and well-drafted, enforcement is feasible. However, overlapping with prior rights could lead to disputes; legal due diligence is recommended.

Q5. What strategic considerations should licensors or licensee parties observe?
They should evaluate the patent’s claims for coverage scope, enforceability, and potential expiration, and consider filing complementary patents or entering licensing agreements accordingly.


Sources:

  1. IMPI patent database records.
  2. Mexican Industrial Property Law, 2022.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscapes and worldwide patent family data.
  4. Patent analysis reports (generic industry insights, 2022).
  5. International Patent Classification (IPC) data for related compounds.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.